Skip to content

· Private foundation

WP & HB White Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
141
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$4.8MHousing & Shelter$3.5MHuman Services$2.5MHealth$1.9MYouth Development$1.5MReligion$1.0MEmployment$888kCrime & Legal$760kOther$0
02FY2025 · 141 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k126 grants · $3.0M
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.3M
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chicago Childrens Advocacy$140,000
WINGS Program$130,000
CARA Program$125,000
The Chicago Lighthouse$120,000
Franciscan Outreach$115,000
Humble Design$100,000
Cristo Rey$100,000
Christ the King Jesuit High School$80,000
Family Rescue$75,000
Parenting for NonViolence$73,000
South Side Center of Hope$70,000
Leveling the Playing Field Inc$50,000
Catholic Theological Union$50,000
Josephinum Academy$50,000
SparkShop$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $25k → 14%Juvenile Protective Association: $25k → 14%CARE FOR FRIENDS: $24k → 14%Fill a Heart 4 Kids: $35k → 8%FILL A HEART 4 KIDS: $25k → 8%TALLER DE JOSE: $25k → 14%TALLER DE JOSE: $25k → 14%Taller de Jose: $25k → 14%Parenting for NonViolence: $73k → 14%TALLER DE JOSE: $25k → 14%PARENTING FOR NON-VIOLENCE: $30k → 14%PARENTING FOR NON-VIOLENCE: $30k → 14%PARENTING FOR NON-VIOLENCE: $30k → 14%PARENTING FOR NON-VIOLENCE: $30k → 14%PARENTING FOR NON-VIOLENCE: $25k → 14%Family Rescue: $75k → 14%FAMILY RESCUE: $25k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $25k → 14%Cradles to Crayons: $25k → 14%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN: $70k → 14%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN: $30k → 14%Safe Families for Children: $30k → 14%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 14%SISTER HOUSE: $50k → 14%SISTER HOUSE: $25k → 14%Sister House: $25k → 14%SISTER HOUSE: $25k → 14%SISTER HOUSE: $25k → 14%SISTER HOUSE: $25k → 14%Chicago Furniture Bank: $30k → 14%CHICAGO FURNITURE BANK: $30k → 14%CHICAGO FURNITURE BANK: $30k → 14%FACING FORWARD TO END HOMELESSNESS: $25k → 14%Facing Forward to End Homelessness: $25k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $25k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $50k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $30k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $30k → 14%CASA Central: $30k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $30k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $25k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $25k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $25k → 14%The Night Ministry: $25k → 14%CAWC: $30k → 14%CAWC: $30k → 14%ASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO: $24k → 14%The Chicago Lighthouse: $120k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 147 repeat orgs$970k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

147 repeat relationships: 122 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

147
20

Total granted

$17M
$449k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+18%

Still filing today

67%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $521k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationHealthCrime & LegalEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    Big Shoulders Fund
    6× · 2020–2025 · $395k · revenue +67%
  • CHICAGO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $330k · revenue +96%
  • WP
    WINGS PROGRAM INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $285k · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • LP
    LOYOLA PRESS
    one grant, 2024 · $70k · revenue -6%
  • ES
    EXECUTIVE SERVICE CORPS
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
  • CS
    CHICAGO SCHOOL OF PROF PSYCHOLOGY
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
2
Child Link Inc

Child Link provides foster care, family counseling, and therapy services to Chicago area adolescents who are at risk of homelessness. Child Link also refers adolescents to other agencies that are able to provide additional resources and…

Human Services
3
Chicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for

Providing academic support to children experiencing homelessness in Chicago and providing resources and services to families experiencing homelessness in Chicago.

Education
4
Live Free Chicago

Live Free Illinois is a statewide organization partnering with over 120 congregations and directly impacted individuals to build safer more equitable communities across Illinois. Operating at the intersection of criminal justice reform and…

—
5
Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness

Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness (CCH) builds community power and advances racial equity through organizing, advocacy, legal assistance, and education to prevent and end homelessness because housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
6
House of the Good Shepherd

House of Good Shepherd serves with love and compassion women and children affected by domestic violence by offering a safe place with opportunities for emotional, educational and spiritual growth, giving hope and continued support for a…

Human Services
7
Center for Housing and Health

Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
8
Chicago Refugee Coalition

The Chicago Refugee Coalition is a 501c3 non-profit organization dedicated ot the alleviation of human suffering through innovative partnerships, advocacy and community empowerment.

Human Services
9
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
10
Thrive Chicago Nfp

Thrive chicago's mission is to prepare chicago's youth for a vibrant future by aligning efforts and outcomes from cradle to career.

Human Services
11
Lakeside Community Committee

To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.

Human Services
12
You Can Make It

Providing interim housing for men, women and children, social services, homeless services, emergency shelter, and housing in chicago community for the homeless, poor and disadvantaged.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc; the most unlike its peers is Will's Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

126 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 126 of the 186 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
124/126
Grantees still filing
87/126
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC THEOLOGICAL UNION: $370,000 · Other+106 more: $9,422,650 · Other+106 morePARENTING FOR NON VIOLENCE: $218,000 · Human ServicesPARENTING FOR NON …SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $195,000 · Human ServicesSAFE FAMILIES FOR …FAMILY RESCUE INC: $180,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESCUE INCCASA CENTRAL SOCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION: $177,000 · Human ServicesCASA CENTRAL SOCIA…SISTERHOUSE: $175,000 · Human ServicesSISTERHOUSETHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $170,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHICAGO LIGHTH…THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $165,000 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINISTRYFACING FORWARD TO END HOMELESSNESS: $140,000 · Human ServicesTALLER DE JOSE: $130,000 · Human ServicesCONNECTIONS FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN: $130,000 · Human ServicesJUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $129,000 · Human ServicesCHICAGO FURNITURE BANK: $110,000 · Human ServicesNEW MOMS INC: $110,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS INC: $100,000 · Human Services+20 more: $811,000 · Human Services+20 moreWINGS PROGRAM INC: $285,000 · Housing & ShelterWINGS PROGRA…REBUILDING TOGETHER NORTH SUBURBAN CHICAGO: $180,000 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING T…The Resurrection Project: $175,000 · Housing & ShelterThe Resurrec…DEBORAH'S PLACE: $172,500 · Housing & ShelterDEBORAH'S PL…THE BOULEVARD OF CHICAGO INC: $161,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE BOULEVAR…HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN INC: $160,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING OPPO…SARAH'S CIRCLE: $140,000 · Housing & ShelterSARAH'S CIRC…LINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES: $130,000 · Housing & ShelterLINCOLN PARK…VOICE OF THE PEOPLE IN UPTOWN INC: $120,000 · Housing & ShelterVOICE OF THE…LA CASA NORTE: $119,000 · Housing & ShelterLA CASA NORT…MERCY HOUSING LAKEFRONT: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterBICKERDIKE REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $85,000 · Housing & ShelterMATTHEW HOUSE INC: $70,000 · Housing & Shelter+3 more: $133,500 · Housing & Shelter+3 moreBig Shoulders Fund: $395,000 · EducationBig Shoul…Target Hope: $205,000 · EducationTarget Ho…THE CHICAGO DEBATE COMMISSION: $140,000 · EducationTHE CHICA…SAINT XAVIER UNIVERSITY: $135,000 · EducationSAINT XAV…CHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL: $115,000 · EducationCHILD'S V…PARENTEACH INSTITUTE: $110,000 · EducationPARENTEAC…EQUALITY DREAM TEAM: $100,000 · EducationEQUALITY …LESLIE SHANKMAN SCHOOL CORPORATION: $95,000 · EducationLESLIE SH…NEWROOT LEARNING INSTITUTE F/K/A UMOJA STUDENT DEVELOPMENT CORP: $75,000 · EducationMidtown-Metro Achievement Centers: $60,000 · Education+2 more: $35,000 · EducationA SAFE HAVEN FOUNDATION: $210,000 · HealthCommunity Health NFP: $155,000 · HealthChildrens Oncology Services Inc: $125,000 · HealthMOBILE CARE FOUNDATION: $102,000 · HealthOLD IRVING PARK COMMUNITY CLINIC: $90,000 · HealthSOUTHSIDE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $85,000 · HealthOak Park River Forest Infant Welfare S: $75,000 · Health+1 more: $25,000 · HealthCHICAGO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $330,000 · Crime & LegalCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF COOK COUNTY: $160,000 · Crime & LegalInside Out Network Inc: $60,000 · Crime & LegalCHILDRENS LEGAL CENTER: $20,000 · Crime & LegalDomestic Violence Outreach: $20,000 · Crime & LegalThe Cara Program: $235,000 · EmploymentJANE ADDAMS RESOURCE CORPORATION: $195,000 · EmploymentTHE LAMBS FARM INC: $90,000 · EmploymentREVOLUTION WORKSHOP: $25,000 · Employment
Other$9,792,650Human Services$2,940,000Housing & Shelter$2,031,500Education$1,465,000Health$867,000Crime & Legal$590,000Employment$545,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $395,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $330,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetWINGS PROGRAM INC: $285,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetRESTORING THE PATH: $260,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetThe Cara Program: $235,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSt Leonard's Ministries: $220,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetPARENTING FOR NON VIOLENCE: $218,000 over 6y, 33% of budgetA SAFE HAVEN FOUNDATION: $210,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO: $210,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTarget Hope: $205,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetSOUTHSIDE CENTER OF HOPE: $200,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetFRANCISCAN OUTREACH: $200,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $195,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetJANE ADDAMS RESOURCE CORPORATION: $195,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetFAMILY RESCUE INC: $180,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER NORTH SUBURBAN CHICAGO: $180,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetCASA CENTRAL SOCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION: $177,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBy The Hand Club For Kids: $175,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSISTERHOUSE: $175,000 over 6y, 8.7% of budgetThe Resurrection Project: $175,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDEBORAH'S PLACE: $172,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetBUILD INC: $170,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetNEOPOLITAN LIGHTHOUSE: $170,000 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $170,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $165,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHIGHSIGHT: $165,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetTHE BOULEVARD OF CHICAGO INC: $161,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN INC: $160,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCHICAGO YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $160,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF COOK COUNTY: $160,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetCommunity Health NFP: $155,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMARGARETS VILLAGE: $150,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetGREATER WEST TOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT: $140,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetFACING FORWARD TO END HOMELESSNESS: $140,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSARAH'S CIRCLE: $140,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLawrence Hall: $140,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHICAGO DEBATE COMMISSION: $140,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetSAINT XAVIER UNIVERSITY: $135,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES: $130,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTALLER DE JOSE: $130,000 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetCONNECTIONS FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN: $130,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetJUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $129,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetChildrens Oncology Services Inc: $125,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetPROJECT VISION INC: $122,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetYOUTH JOB CENTER INC: $120,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetVOICE OF THE PEOPLE IN UPTOWN INC: $120,000 over 6y, 35% of budgetLA CASA NORTE: $119,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL: $115,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WINGS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds RESTORING THE PATH ↗
  • Who funds The Cara Program ↗
  • Who funds St Leonard's Ministries ↗
  • Who funds PARENTING FOR NON VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds A SAFE HAVEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Target Hope ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE CENTER OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds JANE ADDAMS RESOURCE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER NORTH SUBURBAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds CASA CENTRAL SOCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds By The Hand Club For Kids ↗
  • Who funds SISTERHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds The Resurrection Project ↗
  • Who funds DEBORAH'S PLACE ↗
  • Who funds BUILD INC ↗
  • Who funds NEOPOLITAN LIGHTHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds HIGHSIGHT ↗
  • Who funds THE BOULEVARD OF CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF COOK COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Helen V Brach FoundationIL87.9× affinity42 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Helen V Brach Foundation · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Robert R McCormick Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Dr Scholl Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · The a Montgomery Ward Foundation · The Service Club of Chicago · All Chicago Making Homelessness History

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization WP & HB White Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from WP & HB White Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
48report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to WP & HB White Foundation?

Find your warmest path to WP & HB White Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 186 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on WP & HB White’s filings →

More from the funding graph