· Private foundation
The a Montgomery Ward Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $81k
- $10k–50k41 grants · $540k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ASSOCIATED COLLEGES OF ILLINOIS | $62,500 |
| MUSEUM OF SCIENCE & INDUSTRY | $40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $35,899 |
| WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS | $25,000 |
| THE FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY | $25,000 |
| WINGS PROGRAM INC | $24,460 |
| HELPING HAND CENTER | $23,500 |
| AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE | $19,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| KAA - KIDS ABOVE ALL ILLINOIS | $12,000 |
| THE HARBOUR INC | $10,000 |
| CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC | $10,000 |
| FRANCISCAN OUTREACH | $10,000 |
| MERCY HOMES FOR BOYS AND GIRLS | $10,000 |
| BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE OF ILLINOIS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $928k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
91 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2025, 52 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $199k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WPWINGS PROGRAM INC5× · 2020–2025 · $158k · revenue +122%
- HHHELPING HAND CENTER4× · 2020–2025 · $141k · revenue +55%
- FMFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY3× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +112%
Funded once
- MHMERCY HOUSING LAKEFRONTone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -25%
- CFCHICAGO FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INCone grant, 2021 · $26k · revenue +1%
- WTWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMM INCone grant, 2024 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Child Link provides foster care, family counseling, and therapy services to Chicago area adolescents who are at risk of homelessness. Child Link also refers adolescents to other agencies that are able to provide additional resources and…
Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.
A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.
Providing academic support to children experiencing homelessness in Chicago and providing resources and services to families experiencing homelessness in Chicago.
To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.
Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…
To provide residential and rehabilitation services to clients with mental illnesses
Provide community-based residential housing to adults with autism and/or severe developmental disabilities. also provide developmental training and other supports to this same population.
Infant welfare society of chicago (iws) (d/b/a iws family health) provides quality medical, dental and behavioral health services for the health, physical and mental development of children and their families in the chicagoland community.
To help people with developmental disabilities meet life's challenges and reach their highest potential.
The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.
The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Home & Aid Society of Ill and the most unlike its peers is The Adler Planetarium. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
123 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 123 of the 173 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Associated Colleges of Illinois Inc ↗
- Who funds WINGS PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING HAND CENTER ↗
- Who funds Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry ↗
- Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
- Who funds AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOUSING LAKEFRONT ↗
- Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds ORCHARD VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds Howard Area Community Center ↗
- Who funds HOUSING FORWARD ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds DEBORAH'S PLACE ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER OF CONCERN ↗
- Who funds DANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds CASA CENTRAL SOCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE ADLER PLANETARIUM ↗
- Who funds HAVE DREAMS ↗
- Who funds COMMON PANTRY ↗
- Who funds TUTORING CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds FAMILY RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds SNOW CITY ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARGARETS VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds THE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds Chicago Zoological Society ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL ↗
- Who funds DONKA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds HEPHZIBAH CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Helen V Brach Foundation · Andrew and Alice Fischer Charitable Trust · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · WP & HB White Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · The Service Club of Chicago · Dr Scholl Foundation · Blowitz-Ridgeway Foundation · All Chicago Making Homelessness History
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The a Montgomery Ward Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.