· Public charity
All Chicago Making Homelessness History
ALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY leads chicago's collaborative effort to ensure that everyone has a place to call home.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 51 grants below total $16,367,804 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $44,116,635 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $27,748,831 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k4 grants · $121k
- $50k–250k26 grants · $3.8M
- $250k+21 grants · $12M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES | $1,793,777 |
| RENAISSANCE SOCIAL SERVICES | $1,071,083 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA ILLINOIS | $955,650 |
| A SAFE HAVEN FOUNDATION | $753,126 |
| FIRST CHURCH OF THE TRUE BELIEVERS IN CHRIST | $731,260 |
| SARAH'S CIRCLE | $694,153 |
| FACING FORWARD TO END HOMELESSNESS | $649,750 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO | $647,792 |
| FRESH PATH INC | $603,666 |
| THE BOULEVARD OF CHICAGO INC | $561,361 |
| FEATHERFIST | $558,596 |
| WINGS PROGRAM INC | $485,348 |
| WHOLISTIC ALLIANCE | $411,080 |
| FRANCISCAN OUTREACH | $410,803 |
| INNER VOICE INC | $374,300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $18.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.
77 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MFMetropolitan Family Services3× · 2022–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +51%
- ASA SAFE HAVEN FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $3.4M · revenue +53%
- CCCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago7× · 2018–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +9%
Funded once
- IAILLINOIS ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AUDITORS AND FINANCE OFFICERSone grant, 2020 · $238k
- HOHEART OF ILLINOIS UNITED WAY INCone grant, 2020 · $226k · revenue -16%
- DPDUPAGE PADS INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $217k · revenue +66%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness (CCH) builds community power and advances racial equity through organizing, advocacy, legal assistance, and education to prevent and end homelessness because housing is a human right.
To disrupt cycles of poverty with dignified transitional housing that hoslistically connects young men to opportunities that create and sustain personal, professional and relational growth.
To provide residential and rehabilitation services to clients with mental illnesses
Child Link provides foster care, family counseling, and therapy services to Chicago area adolescents who are at risk of homelessness. Child Link also refers adolescents to other agencies that are able to provide additional resources and…
To reduce inter-generational poverty by promoting strategies that encourage racial and economic diversity in the housing market, primarily in the chicago area and nationally as well.
Providing interim housing for men, women and children, social services, homeless services, emergency shelter, and housing in chicago community for the homeless, poor and disadvantaged.
Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.
House of Good Shepherd serves with love and compassion women and children affected by domestic violence by offering a safe place with opportunities for emotional, educational and spiritual growth, giving hope and continued support for a…
Serving recently arrived migrants and asylum seekers in the Chicagoland area and is committed to upholding the dignity and human rights of immigrants.
Shelter's mission is to end the cycle of child abuse by providing a comprehensive network of support to children, their families, and our community to create safe, health, and nurturing homes.
Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…
We empower participants living with mental illness through individualized housing, employment, and clinical services so they can achieve their goals and live as independently as possible.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc and the most unlike its peers is Chicago Street Medicine. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
126 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 126 of the 142 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Metropolitan Family Services ↗
- Who funds A SAFE HAVEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago ↗
- Who funds Renaissance Social Services Inc ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOULEVARD OF CHICAGO INC ↗
- Who funds FEATHERFIST ↗
- Who funds TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES FOR STRONGER COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds SARAH'S CIRCLE ↗
- Who funds FACING FORWARD TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
- Who funds Center for Housing and Health ↗
- Who funds WINGS PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds LA CASA NORTE ↗
- Who funds DEBORAH'S PLACE II ↗
- Who funds The Inner Voice Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITY PARENTING & COUNSELING INC ↗
- Who funds FRANCISCAN OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds SCALELIT FKA CHICAGO CITYWIDE LITERACY COALITION ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND ALLIANCE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Legal Council for Health Justice ↗
- Who funds Fresh Path Inc ↗
- Who funds Of Color Inc ↗
- Who funds Christian Community Health Center ↗
- Who funds APNA GHAR INC ↗
- Who funds SPANISH COALITION FOR HOUSING ↗
- Who funds PRIMO CENTER FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Cornerstone Community Outreach ↗
- Who funds PUERTO RICAN CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds Wholistic Alliance ↗
- Who funds PHALANX FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds IGNITE ↗
- Who funds CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds Emmaus Ministries ↗
- Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Cuore e Mani Foundation · Blowitz-Ridgeway Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · The Chicago Community Trust · Greater Chicago Food Depository · The Pierce Family Charitable Foundation · Visiting Nurse Association of Chicago (Aka) Vna Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization All Chicago Making Homelessness History funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.