· Public charity
World Childhood Foundation Inc
The mission of the foundation is to inspire, promote, and develop solutions to end the sexual abuse and exploitation of children.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 20 grants below total $902,133 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $932,133 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $30,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k11 grants · $272k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $630k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $150,000 |
| THE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH | $100,000 |
| STOP IT NOW | $77,540 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION | $52,103 |
| PREVENT CHILD ABUSE VERMONT | $50,000 |
| GIRLS FOR GENDER EQUITY | $50,000 |
| SAFEBAE | $50,000 |
| NEST FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING | $50,000 |
| NEW ENGLAND ADOLESCENT MASOC | $45,210 |
| SAFE HORIZON | $32,500 |
| CACTX | $30,000 |
| ALASKA CHILDREN'S TRUST | $30,000 |
| COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE HOME EDUCATION | $30,000 |
| HOLLY'S HOUSE INC | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 12% of World Childhood Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 24% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 21% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $233k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TBTHE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH6× · 2019–2024 · $575k · revenue +31%
- SHSAFE HORIZON INC7× · 2018–2024 · $451k · revenue +28%
- NYNEW YORK FOUNDLING6× · 2018–2024 · $215k · revenue +81%
Funded once
- DTDARKNESS TO LIGHT INCone grant, 2022 · $77k · revenue -57%
- UOUniversity of Minnesotaone grant, 2023 · $75k
- UOUniverity of Minnesotaone grant, 2022 · $75k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.
Pca promotes healing and justice for sexually abused children in philadelphia. using a multidisciplinary approach, we collaborate with our partners in child protection, law enforcement, and medical and mental health services to provide…
In Tulsa County there are several agencies that address prevention and treatment of child abuse, but the Child Advocacy Network (CAN) is the ONLY nonprofit that provides intervention services for children and their nonoffending…
Advocacy for abused children
The mission of Childs Place is to listen to children in a safe developmentally sensitive and legally sound manner; to unite professionals in a coordinated response to child abuse; to guide children and families toward healing through…
To deliver excellence in child abuse response, offer a path toward healing, and educate the community. our cac serves children in 14 counties and is the only non-profit organization coordinating the efforts of a multidisciplinary team…
Dcac works to improve the lives of children traumatized by sexual abuse, neglect and violence-as well as those who are at high-risk with prevention, education, and direct services. our mission is to prevent abuse strengthen families…
Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.
The chicago children's advocacy center unites public, private, and community partners to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of abused children.
The child advocacy center of greater rochester delivers excellence in child abuse response, healing and prevention through collaborative service, awareness, education and leadership.
To protect and uphold the rights of children when wrongs have been committed against them, to help abused or neglected children have safe permanent homes where they can thrive, to act as a powerful voice in these children's best interests…
To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe & Sound and the most unlike its peers is National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds SAFE HORIZON INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTHLINK ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDLING ↗
- Who funds SafeBae Org Inc ↗
- Who funds STOP IT NOW INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS FOR GENDER EQUITY INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC ↗
- Who funds ENOUGH ABUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE & SOUND ↗
- Who funds BronxCare Health Systems ↗
- Who funds NEST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PREVENT CHILD ABUSE VERMONT ↗
- Who funds DARKNESS TO LIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds PEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS DISTRICT IX CHAPTER 2 ↗
- Who funds NOMI NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND ADOLESCENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL SOCIETY ON THE ABUSE OF CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE HOME EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds Holly's House Inc ↗
- Who funds ALASKA CHILDREN'S TRUST ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds MASOC INC ↗
- Who funds PREVENT CHILD ABUSE AMERICA ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds HIDDEN WATER INC ↗
- Who funds Rape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) ↗
- Who funds LANTUUN DOHIO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization World Childhood Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Prevent Child Abuse Vermont — 58% of income from government
- Masoc Inc — 46% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to World Childhood Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to World Childhood Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.