Skip to content
Voigt Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Voigt Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$127kEnvironment$69kEducation$57kYouth Development$53kHealth$39kHousing & Shelter$30kHuman Services$25kRecreation & Sports$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HENRY'S FORK FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BONNEVILLE COUNTY FOP 8$4,500
IDAHO YOUTH RANCH$4,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF ADA COUNTY$4,000
SNAKE RIVER ANIMAL SHELTER$3,000
IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
TETON VALLEY HAPI TRAILS HORSE ADOP$2,500
MAYO CLINIC$2,500
TETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST$2,500
LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY$2,500
HOSPICE OF EASTERN IDAHO$2,500
DOG IS MY COPILOT$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $4k → 11%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $3k → 11%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $3k → 11%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $3k → 11%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $3k → 11%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$452k · 27 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +111% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
11

Total granted

$452k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+111%
+30%

Still filing today

41%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthEnvironmentPublic BenefitEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +157%
  • SR
    SNAKE RIVER ANIMAL SHELTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +139%
  • TR
    TETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +300%

Funded once

  • CF
    CEI FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • EI
    EAST IDAHO COMMUNITY COMM
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • IF
    IDAHO FALLS-BONNEVILLE COUNTY DARE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue -68%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho Animal Rescue Network

Idaho Animal Rescue Network is a 501(c)(3) non-profit based in Idaho that works in Idaho and Eastern Washington to educate, advocate, and network with other rescues and law enforcement in Idaho regarding animal cruelty and neglect. We are…

Animals
2
Beaverhead Animal Shelter

The mission is to protect and care for homeless animals in the Dillon and Beaverhead county area.

Animals
3
The Animal Retreat Inc formerly Meridian Canine Rescue Inc

Meridian Canine Rescue's mission is to save animals' lives through storytelling and education. We focus primarily on individual dogs and their unique behaviors as we provide resources to the public, facilitate adoptions, and train…

Animals
4
Idaho Humane Society Inc

The mission of the Idaho Humane Society (IHS) is to advocate for the welfare and responsible care of animals, protect them from neglect and cruelty, and promote humane education, awareness and compassion for all living creatures.

Animals
5
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
6
Platte Ranch Forever Home Sanctuary
Animals
7
Heart of Idaho Animal Sanctuary Np Inc

Rescue, rehabilitate, and find homes for and/or make every reasonable effort to offer permanent residence to animals in need. We will be a voice of advocacy and education for animal welfare, humane treatment and population control. We will…

Animals
8
Wolfe Ranch Rescue
Animals
9
Herding Dog Rescue of Central Oregon

Our mission is to help herding dogs who are abandoned, neglected and abused or simply in the wrong home into a loving appropriate home.

Animals
10
Idaho Wildlife Federation

The Idaho Wildlife Federation (IWF) promotes the conservation of Idaho's wildlife heritage and legacy of sporting opportunities for the current and future generations.

Animals
11
Foothill Dog Rescue of the Sierras

Foothill Dog Rescue is a 100% all volunteer organization dedicated to re-homing dogs from over crowded animal shelters, owner surrenders and underserved communities. We also sponsor vaccine and microchip clinics for our County and have…

Animals
12
People for Pets Magic Valley Humane Society

The organization provides animal care, animal shelter and adoption opportunities for thousands of dogs and cats located in the city of twin falls, idaho and in the surrounding in the city of twin falls, idaho and in the surrounding

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Idaho Youth Ranch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dog Is My Copilot. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC: $46,500 · OtherHENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF ADA COUNTY: $32,500 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF ADA COUNTYTHE HAVEN SHELTER: $30,000 · OtherTHE HAVEN SHELTERIndividual grant recipient: $28,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTETON VALLEY HAPI TRAILS HORSE ADOP: $22,000 · OtherTETON VALLEY HAPI TRAILS HORSE ADOPIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherTETON RAPTOR CENTER: $16,000 · OtherCEI FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherMAYO CLINIC: $14,500 · OtherTHE EXCHANGE CLUB OF IDAHO FALLS: $13,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $13,000 · Other+16 more: $59,500 · Other+16 moreSNAKE RIVER ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $30,800 · AnimalsSNAKE RIVER ANIMA…DOG IS MY COPILOT: $10,000 · AnimalsDOG IS MY COPILOTANIMAL HUMANE ASSOC OF STAR VALLEY: $9,500 · AnimalsANIMAL HUMANE ASS…Animal Adoption Center Inc: $9,000 · AnimalsAnimal Adoption C…GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE OF THE ROCKIES: $8,500 · AnimalsGOLDEN RETRIEVER …The Aska's Animals Foundation Inc: $6,000 · AnimalsThe Aska's Animal…+2 more: $5,000 · Animals+2 moreHOSPICE OF EASTERN IDAHO INC: $22,500 · HealthSHEPHERDS INN CORPORATION: $2,000 · HealthLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $21,000 · EducationAlturas International Academy Inc: $3,000 · EducationTETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC: $22,500 · EnvironmentIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $16,500 · Human ServicesIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $3,000 · Food & NutritionCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · Public Benefit
Other$354,000Animals$78,800Health$24,500Education$24,000Environment$22,500Human Services$16,500Food & Nutrition$3,000Public Benefit$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC: $46,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSNAKE RIVER ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $30,800 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetTETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC: $22,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHOSPICE OF EASTERN IDAHO INC: $22,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $16,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTETON RAPTOR CENTER: $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDOG IS MY COPILOT: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL HUMANE ASSOC OF STAR VALLEY: $9,500 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetAnimal Adoption Center Inc: $9,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE OF THE ROCKIES: $8,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetThe Aska's Animals Foundation Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetIDAHO FALLS-BONNEVILLE COUNTY DARE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetAlturas International Academy Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSON HOLE REGIONAL HORSE RESCUE: $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSHEPHERDS INN CORPORATION: $2,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUN VALLEY CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SNAKE RIVER ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF EASTERN IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds TETON RAPTOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DOG IS MY COPILOT ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOC OF STAR VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Animal Adoption Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds The Aska's Animals Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO FALLS-BONNEVILLE COUNTY DARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Alturas International Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON HOLE REGIONAL HORSE RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO REINING HORSE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERDS INN CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cross Charitable Foun…Community Foundation …Timothy T Day Foundat…Chc FoundationIdaho Community Found…First Interstate Banc…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Network for GoodMorgan Stanley Global…Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…
Cross Charitable Foundation Attn John R ClarkMT19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cross Charitable Foundation Attn John R Clark · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Timothy T Day Foundation Inc · Chc Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Voigt Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Voigt Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Voigt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home