· Private foundation
Timothy T Day Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $72k
- $10k–50k29 grants · $557k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.2M
- $250k+9 grants · $3.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE TUN LEGACY FOUNDATION INC | $1,000,000 |
| KINGDOM X | $600,000 |
| ANIMAL GUARDIAN NETWORK | $490,243 |
| HBS ADVANCED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM | $368,000 |
| MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION | $350,000 |
| HEROIC HEARTS PROJECT | $250,000 |
| MAYO CLINIC | $250,000 |
| THE TRINITY CHURCH | $250,000 |
| SEMPER FI FUND | $250,000 |
| MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| DOG IS MY COPILOT | $110,000 |
| MARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| PAWS OF JACKSON HOLE | $100,000 |
| MARINE CORPS ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| FLYING LEATHERNECK HISTORICAL FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $7.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
75 repeat relationships — 58 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $7.0M · revenue +7%
- SFSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND8× · 2017–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +56%
- AGANIMAL GUARDIAN NETWORK INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +98% · 77% of their budget
Funded once
- TCTHUNDERBIRDS CHARITIESone grant, 2020 · $85k · revenue +9%
- SFSEEK FIRST MINISTRYone grant, 2018 · $60k
- SFSEEK FIRST MINISTRY KINGDOM Xone grant, 2019 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rescue, rehabilitation and "re-homing" of unwanted and abandoned dogs.
To rescue and save homeless, unwanted, abandoned, neglected, and abused dogs
Animal rescue
Freedom Brothers Rescue and Recovery is a non-profit, no-kill, volunteer animal rescue and recovery organization serving the Phoenix Arizona area.
To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.
Foothill Dog Rescue is a 100% all volunteer organization dedicated to re-homing dogs from over crowded animal shelters, owner surrenders and underserved communities. We also sponsor vaccine and microchip clinics for our County and have…
Rescue of abused or abandoned animals
Our mission is to save dogs in distressing conditions on both sides of the California/Mexican border. We provide them with essential medical treatment and care to help them regain their health, and ultimately match them with loving homes…
Prevention of animal cruelty and intervention on behalf of animals being abused.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arizona Humane Society and the most unlike its peers is Bad Rap. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 114 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL GUARDIAN NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds THE TUN LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KINGDOM X INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE CORPS ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Animal Adoption Center Inc ↗
- Who funds PAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DOG IS MY COPILOT ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE ARIZONA PET PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds FLYING LEATHERNECK HISTORICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Lost Our Home Pet Foundation ↗
- Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds National Mill Dog Rescue ↗
- Who funds Sky Sanctuary Rescue ↗
- Who funds BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Aska's Animals Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds 2ND CHANCE DOG RESCUE ↗
- Who funds PINTLER PETS ↗
- Who funds PUG RESCUE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PUG NATION RESCUE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds THUNDERBIRDS CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds Luv of dogz fund ↗
- Who funds THE INNER PUP ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911 · American Express Foundation · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Arizona Community Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · Best Friends Animal Society · Petsmart Charities Inc · Greater Good Charities · The Brooks Foundation · Pedigree Foundation · Petco Love · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Timothy T Day Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Southwestern Oklahoma State University Foundation Inc — 6% of income from government
- Wesleyan University — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Timothy T Day Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Timothy T Day Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.