· Private foundation
Voigt Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| HENRY'S FORK FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| BONNEVILLE COUNTY FOP 8 | $4,500 |
| IDAHO YOUTH RANCH | $4,000 |
| BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF ADA COUNTY | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| SNAKE RIVER ANIMAL SHELTER | $3,000 |
| IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE | $3,000 |
| MAYO CLINIC | $2,500 |
| TETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST | $2,500 |
| LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| HOSPICE OF EASTERN IDAHO | $2,500 |
| TETON VALLEY HAPI TRAILS HORSE ADOP | $2,500 |
| DOG IS MY COPILOT | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +111% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +146%
- SRSNAKE RIVER ANIMAL SHELTER INC9× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +139%
- TRTETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +233%
Funded once
- CFCEI FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $15k
- EIEAST IDAHO COMMUNITY COMMone grant, 2020 · $5k
- IFIDAHO FALLS-BONNEVILLE COUNTY DARE INCone grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue -68%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Idaho Animal Rescue Network is a 501(c)(3) non-profit based in Idaho that works in Idaho and Eastern Washington to educate, advocate, and network with other rescues and law enforcement in Idaho regarding animal cruelty and neglect. We are…
The mission is to protect and care for homeless animals in the Dillon and Beaverhead county area.
Meridian Canine Rescue's mission is to save animals' lives through storytelling and education. We focus primarily on individual dogs and their unique behaviors as we provide resources to the public, facilitate adoptions, and train…
The mission of the Idaho Humane Society (IHS) is to advocate for the welfare and responsible care of animals, protect them from neglect and cruelty, and promote humane education, awareness and compassion for all living creatures.
Rescue, rehabilitate, and find homes for and/or make every reasonable effort to offer permanent residence to animals in need. We will be a voice of advocacy and education for animal welfare, humane treatment and population control. We will…
Our mission is to help herding dogs who are abandoned, neglected and abused or simply in the wrong home into a loving appropriate home.
The Idaho Wildlife Federation (IWF) promotes the conservation of Idaho's wildlife heritage and legacy of sporting opportunities for the current and future generations.
Foothill Dog Rescue is a 100% all volunteer organization dedicated to re-homing dogs from over crowded animal shelters, owner surrenders and underserved communities. We also sponsor vaccine and microchip clinics for our County and have…
The organization provides animal care, animal shelter and adoption opportunities for thousands of dogs and cats located in the city of twin falls, idaho and in the surrounding in the city of twin falls, idaho and in the surrounding
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Idaho Youth Ranch Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dog Is My Copilot. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SNAKE RIVER ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF EASTERN IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds TETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds TETON RAPTOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds DOG IS MY COPILOT ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOC OF STAR VALLEY ↗
- Who funds Animal Adoption Center Inc ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds The Aska's Animals Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds IDAHO FALLS-BONNEVILLE COUNTY DARE INC ↗
- Who funds Alturas International Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HOLE REGIONAL HORSE RESCUE ↗
- Who funds IDAHO REINING HORSE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERDS INN CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cross Charitable Foundation Attn John R Clark · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Timothy T Day Foundation Inc · Chc Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Voigt Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.