· Private foundation
Vera and Joseph Dresner Foundation Dba Dresner Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of VERA AND JOSEPH DRESNER FOUNDATION DBA DRESNER FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k25 grants · $97k
- $10k–50k28 grants · $594k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.2M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | $400,000 |
| FORGOTTEN HARVEST | $262,500 |
| OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIV FOU | $250,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE | $125,000 |
| THE BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL | $125,000 |
| FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH | $125,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER | $125,000 |
| MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM | $110,000 |
| RACQUET UP DETROIT | $100,000 |
| MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY | $100,000 |
| MACOMB COUNTY ROTATING EMERG SHELT | $65,000 |
| ACCOUNTING AID SOCIETY | $59,317 |
| THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCET DEPAUL | $50,000 |
| DETROIT FOOD AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
92 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2024, 45 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $707k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DEDETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION4× · 2020–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +23%
FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +2%- TETHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN4× · 2020–2023 · $785k · revenue +7%
Funded once
DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $307k · revenue +32%- TCTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $250k
- NSNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ORGANIZATIONone grant, 2021 · $195k · revenue -28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.
The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…
Gdahc mission: together with our partners, we empower and improve the health and economic vitality of individuals, organizations and communities by catalyzing the power of collaboration. gdahc vision: healthy people. healthy community.…
The chamber is the voice for business and works to power the economy for southeast michigan through public policy, advocacy and leading regional economic development and talent initiatives.
Creating healthy communities - together
Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.
The detroit creativity project ("dcp") seeks to empower and inspire detroit's young people through improvisation, an art form that helps people build confidence and develop a creative and collaborative approach to their lives.
For all state residents, diverse civic stakeholders and philanthropy, the center for michigan (the center) and its nonprofit newsrooms - bridge michigan and bridgedetroit - make michigan better through high-quality, nonpartisan journalism…
We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bloomfield Hills Schools Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
124 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 124 of the 194 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds DETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN ↗
- Who funds THE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds DETROIT POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds RACQUET UP DETROIT ↗
- Who funds VISION TO LEARN ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds VISTA MARIA ↗
- Who funds 826 MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD GATHERERS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Dte Energy Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · The Kresge Foundation · United Jewish Foundation · Comerica Charitable Foundation · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · The Barton Malow Foundation · The Carls Foundation · Children's Hospital of Michigan Foundation · The Skillman Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Vera and Joseph Dresner Foundation Dba Dresner Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Vera and Joseph Dresner Foundation Dba Dresner Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Vera and Joseph Dresner Foundation Dba Dresner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.