Loading…
Loading…
Colorado · Nonprofit
ASPEN HOPE CENTER (Colorado) is funded by 69 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $6,139,229 in grants to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($1,200,200). 43 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
ASPEN HOPE CENTER has grown faster than three-quarters of the 6,792 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,792 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
39% of ASPEN HOPE CENTER’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (52% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$58k from 5 funders in 2025, up from $257k and 15 in 2017.
16 of 69 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 49% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of ASPEN HOPE CENTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 69 funders by total. Association, not causation.
ASPEN HOPE CENTER has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 20% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 34% · 2018 26% · 2019 22% · 2020 23% · 2021 39% · 2022 34% · 2023 31% · 2024 29% · 2025 66% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
43% of ASPEN HOPE CENTER's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 62% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
ASPEN HOPE CENTER draws 60% of its grant income from funders outside Colorado — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 21 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 69 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
69% of spending goes to programs.
88%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 69funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing