· Public charity
United Way of the Wine Country
The mission of the UNITED WAY OF THE WINE COUNTRY is to improve financial stability for all families throughout our service area by activating local businesses, inspiring individual investment, advancing community collaboratives, and influencing public policy.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES (NCO) | $50,000 |
| SONOMA COUNTY ACTION NETWORK (CAP) | $29,270 |
| NUESTRA ALLIANZA DE WILLITS | $21,670 |
| RED LATINX THE HUB | $19,036 |
| REDWOOD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY | $18,629 |
| RIVER TO COAST CHILDREN SERVICES | $11,682 |
| LA LUZ CENTER | $9,459 |
| OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE | $9,417 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SONOMA COUNTY7× · 2019–2025 · $812k · revenue +55%
- LSLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA2× · 2020–2021 · $791k · revenue +53%
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA6× · 2017–2022 · $715k · revenue +67%
Funded once
- RNREBUILD NORTH BAY FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue +556%
- ECExtended Child Care Coalition of Sonoma Countyone grant, 2018 · $200k · revenue +2%
- HCHOPE CRISIS RESPONSE NETWORK INC- HCRNgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $175k · revenue +107%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Homes for Sonoma is a nonprofit developer creating quality workforce housing options that support safe and sustainable community, and finds efficient, scalable solutions to address the housing crisis in Sonoma County and throughout…
Address the homeless crisis in California.
The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.
The purpose of North Bay Regional Center (The "Center") is to assist people with developmental disabilities or at risk for developmental disabilities in the North Bay Area to obtain services and support they need to live as other people…
The New California Coalition (NCC) is a forward-thinking organization with a bold mission: to identify and implement solutions that will pave the way for enduring, generational change in Sacramento and across the entire state of California.
Solano Family & Children's Services promotes and advocates for the well-being of children, their families, and child care providers by offering access to a variety of child care resources.
Community Housing Sonoma County creates supportive housing communities for people living with disabling conditions, especially veterans.
Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.
The NCS Vision: To nurture and empower the whole child and family, to enhance our quality of life, and create a more peaceful community.
The Sonoma County Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) Program serves abused and neglected children coming before the Juvenile Court of Protection and Rehabilitation Services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Coast Opportunities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lake County Economic Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SONOMA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA ↗
- Who funds NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds REBUILD NORTH BAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURG ↗
- Who funds Extended Child Care Coalition of Sonoma County ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER CENTER OF SONOMA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HOPE CRISIS RESPONSE NETWORK INC- HCRN ↗
- Who funds Northern California Center For Well-Being ↗
- Who funds North Bay Organizing Project ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds NUESTRA ALIANZA DE WILLITS ↗
- Who funds WEST COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HUMBOLDT COMMUNITY ACCESS AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Community Child Care Council of Sonoma County ↗
- Who funds 2-1-1 Humboldt Information and Resource Center ↗
- Who funds LA LUZ CENTER ↗
- Who funds PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER ↗
- Who funds RIVER TO COAST CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDIAN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds North Bay Jobs With Justice ↗
- Who funds LATINO SERVICE PROVIDERS ↗
- Who funds Sonoma County Grape Growers Foundation ↗
- Who funds Daily Acts Organization ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE BAY AREA ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ROUND VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds Yuba-Sutter-Colusa United Way ↗
- Who funds United Way of Nevada County ↗
- Who funds UPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds TLC Child and Family Services ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Redwood Credit Union Community Fund Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Marin Community Foundation · Peter E Haas Jr Family Fund · The Heck Foundation · California Fire Foundation · Latino Community Foundation · Healthcare Foundation Northern Sonoma County · The San Francisco Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of the Wine Country funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.