· Public charity
California Fire Foundation
The CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION (cff) is a public benefit charity that provides assistance to victims of fire and conducts public education campaigns about fire safety and the devastating effects of fire.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 88 grants below total $1,492,051 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,588,421 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,096,370 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k77 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k4 grants · $247k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PROJECTCAMP | $75,000 |
| NORTHERN VALLEY CATHOLIC SOCIAL SER | $65,000 |
| HAWAII FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION L | $57,166 |
| THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA | $50,000 |
| OTHERS | $48,124 |
| THE CALIFORNIA LATINO LEGISLATIVE C | $45,000 |
| EL DORADO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| NORTH COAST RESOURCE CONSERVATION & | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NORTH S | $25,000 |
| TRAUMA INTERVENTION PROGRAM FOOTHIL | $23,156 |
| KETTENPOM-ZENIA VOLUNTEERS | $23,000 |
| CALAVERAS CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECT | $22,624 |
| BUILDING RESILIENT COMMUNITIES | $21,000 |
| JACKSON VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DIST | $18,500 |
| RESCUE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT | $17,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $883k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
136 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2024, 92 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $654k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHAWAII FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION LOCAL 1463 INT'L ASSOCOF FIREFGHTR2× · 2023–2024 · $729k · revenue +12% · 31% of their budget
- NCNORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC5× · 2019–2024 · $345k · revenue +49%
- EIEmergencyRV Inc2× · 2021–2022 · $225k · revenue +19% · 49% of their budget
Funded once
- IAINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +45%
- TPTINY PINE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $80k · revenue +102%
- JLJumpstart Labs Inc DBA Jewish JUMPSTART JSLABSone grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue -98%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide volunteer firefighting and other emergency services for the community.
Promote fire safety in Mariposa County through educating home owners about clearing PRC Section 4291 defensible space, coordinating efforts with various agencies to clear PRC Section 4291 defensible space, etc. Obtain/administer/manage…
To provide education, assist emergency services with finding homes and to help mitigate fire hazards around rural neighborhoods.
To provide education, implement and fund projects in accordance with National and California Fire Plans, mobilize citizens and agencies to reduce losses from wildfires, exchange information and foster fire prevention and fire safety within…
To reduce the risk of loss of life and property in the Timberview and adjacent areas through promotion of fire safety, education, prevention and suppression as well as related emergency procedures.
Fire prevention and safety
To provide free, high quality fire and emergency medical response to the people of and visitors to the Cachagua Valley and surrounding areas.
Education of Emergency First Responders.
Fire suppression, rescue and emergency medical first responders in this remote, rural coastal area. sonoma county service area #25.
To lead california communities in wildfire risk reduction and resiliency.
The mission is to bring resources to the coastal hills community to create a healthier and safer forest where all residents flourish.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of the Napa Valley and the most unlike its peers is Tuolumne Fire Safe Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
220 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 220 of the 468 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAWAII FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION LOCAL 1463 INT'L ASSOCOF FIREFGHTR ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NORTH STATE ↗
- Who funds VENTURA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MENDOCINO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds EmergencyRV Inc ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds SAFETY BLITZ FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECTCAMP ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds El Dorado Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC ↗
- Who funds KERN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN VALLEY CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds TINY PINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FIREFIGHTERS BURN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO REGIONAL FIRE & EMERGENCY ↗
- Who funds Building Resilient Communities ↗
- Who funds KERN RIVER CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds John Burton Advocates for Youth ↗
- Who funds TEHAMA CONSERVATION FUND ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE VOLUNTEERS OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA ↗
- Who funds Tenants Together ↗
- Who funds OAKLAND FIRESAFE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Women in California Leadership Inc ↗
- Who funds The Childrens Lifesaving Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Fire Safe Council Inc · United Way of the Wine Country · Latino Community Foundation · Public Health Institute · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · United Way of Northern California · North Valley Community Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Humboldt Area Foundation · Sonoma County Community Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · The PG&E Corporation Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization California Fire Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Center for Independent Documentary Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.