· Public charity
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee
Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 55 grants below total $78,401,768 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $153,881,010 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $75,479,242 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $1k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $92k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $858k
- $250k+40 grants · $77M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED STATES OLYMPIC & PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION | $14,610,718 |
| UNITED STATES SKI ASSOCIATION | $8,444,358 |
| USA TRACK & FIELD INC | $5,286,050 |
| USA SWIMMING INC | $5,019,258 |
| USA GYMNASTICS | $3,408,370 |
| USA CYCLING INC | $2,715,214 |
| US SPEEDSKATING | $2,199,120 |
| USA VOLLEYBALL | $2,049,397 |
| USA BOBSLEDSKELETON INC | $2,012,202 |
| UNITED STATES ROWING ASSOCIATION | $1,950,175 |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WRESTLING ASSOCIATION | $1,907,886 |
| USA WATER POLO INC | $1,707,500 |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION LTD | $1,624,000 |
| USA HOCKEY INC | $1,606,000 |
| USA DIVING INC | $1,497,116 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
72 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- USUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION7× · 2018–2024 · $89M · revenue +78% · 34% of their budget
- USUnited States Ski Association8× · 2017–2024 · $55M · revenue +58%
- UGUSA Gymnastics8× · 2017–2024 · $20M · revenue +60%
Funded once
- TATHE ATHLETE ASSISTANCE FUND INCone grant, 2018 · $1.3M · revenue -99% · 93% of their budget
- USUnited States Olympic and Paralympic Museumone grant, 2023 · $924k · revenue -12%
- STSWIM TRIALS LLCone grant, 2021 · $290k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.
Preserve the integrity of competition, inspire true sport, protect the rights of u.s. athletes
United states aquatic sports, inc is the national federation for all united states olympic aquatic sports. this includes usa swimming, usa diving, us artistic swimming, usa water polo, and us masters swi
USA Ultimate serves as the governing body for the sport of Ultimate in the US, making it responsible for enhancing and promoting the sport through character, community, and competition.
United states skiing foundation is engaged in not-for-profit membership, competition, training, development, and educational activities related to amateur skiers and snowboarders who are, or aspire to become, members of the u.s. ski and…
To promote amateur national and international athletic competition, to educate the public of the benefits of practical shooting, to train range officers, to set forth rules and regulations for the conduct of practical shooting, to assist…
The organization develops, promotes, and administers the game of soccer among players, men and women, within the u.s. the association fosters national and international amateur competition and develops amateur athletes for national and…
Athletic team sporting events
To deliver programs and services that support all our members, foster a community of skilled and knowledgeable pilots, and promote and protect the freedom to fly.
To offer amateur sports programs through a volunteer base for all people to have the physical mental and moral development of amateur athletes and to promote good sportsmanship and good citizenship.
World lacrosse is the international olympic committee recognized international federation for the sport of lacrosse. as such, it governs the sport globally working with 90+ member national governing bodies and four (4) currently recognized…
Provide a world-class athletics and academic experience for student-athletes that fosters lifelong well-being.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Us Speedskating and the most unlike its peers is Climbing for Change Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds United States Ski Association ↗
- Who funds USA Gymnastics ↗
- Who funds USA CYCLING INC ↗
- Who funds USA BOBSLEDSKELETON INC ↗
- Who funds US SPEEDSKATING ↗
- Who funds USA VOLLEYBALL ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WRESTLING ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES ROWING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds USA Shooting Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES CENTER FOR SAFESPORT ↗
- Who funds USA HOCKEY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION LTD ↗
- Who funds USA WATER POLO INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FIGURE SKATING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES LUGE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES CURLING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds USA Basketball ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES SAILING ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds USA Track & Field Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES BIATHLON ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds USA DIVING INC ↗
- Who funds United States Fencing Association ↗
- Who funds USA Swimming Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF THE US ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FIELD HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds United States Judo Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES SOCCER FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds USA Climbing ↗
- Who funds Partnership for Clean Competition ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES ASSOCIATION OF BLIND ATHLETES INC ↗
- Who funds USA WEIGHTLIFTING INC ↗
- Who funds USA SOFTBALL INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WHEELCHAIR BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Womens Sports Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · North Carolina Sports Legacy Foundation Fka Promote the Youth Foundation · Colorado Springs Sports Corporation · The Collinson Family Foundation · Share Winter Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Christopher Reeve Foundation · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · California Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Usa Water Ski & Wake Sports Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.