Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Colorado · Nonprofit

Partnership for Clean Competition

Partnership for Clean Competition (Colorado) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,705,000 to it, the largest being UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE ($3,750,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$1.8M
Revenue FY2025
4
Funders on record
$6.7M
Grants received
$3.4M
Net assets
3/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 49%

Against its field

Partnership for Clean Competition runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 165 science & tech nonprofits its size.

Operating margin63% · top quartile
Months of reserve63.6mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−4% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 165 science & tech nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.5M) Expenses 100 ($2.4M) Net assets 100 ($7.4M)2018 Revenue 118 ($3.0M) Expenses 118 ($2.8M) Net assets 102 ($7.6M)2019 Revenue 102 ($2.6M) Expenses 159 ($3.8M) Net assets 87 ($6.4M)2020 Revenue 70 ($1.8M) Expenses 200 ($4.7M) Net assets 46 ($3.4M)2021 Revenue 59 ($1.5M) Expenses 115 ($2.7M) Net assets 28 ($2.1M)2022 Revenue 78 ($2.0M) Expenses 101 ($2.4M) Net assets 23 ($1.7M)2023 Revenue 74 ($1.9M) Expenses 79 ($1.9M) Net assets 23 ($1.7M)2024 Revenue 64 ($1.6M) Expenses 44 ($1.0M) Net assets 31 ($2.3M)2025 Revenue 70 ($1.8M) Expenses 28 ($663k) Net assets 46 ($3.4M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (70)Expenses (28)Net assets (46)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

93% of Partnership for Clean Competition’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (68% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 500 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$159k
17
$187k
18
$1.2M
19
$3.0M
20
$1.2M
21
$415k
22
$8k
23
$575k
24
$1.1M
25
64
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 3 funders, grant income fell $1.1M → $650k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
Pga Tour Incunclassified
$950k
funders
3
3
4
3
2
3
3
3

From the IRS filings of Partnership for Clean Competition’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Partnership for Clean Competition leans on a few funders — its largest provides 56% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Partnership for Clean Competition.

56%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 67% · 2018 67% · 2019 66% · 2020 57% · 2021 50% · 2022 38% · 2023 38%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

86% of Partnership for Clean Competition's grant income comes from Colorado funders.

PA
CO
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Colorado out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like Partnership for Clean Competition

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Colorado

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

80% of spending goes to programs.

Program 80%Management 19%Fundraising 2%

Governance

6
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

41%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 51 states

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Partnership for Clean Competition: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Partnership for Clean Competition?
Partnership for Clean Competition (Colorado) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,705,000 to it, the largest being UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE ($3,750,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Partnership for Clean Competition have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $6,705,000 in grants to Partnership for Clean Competition, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Partnership for Clean Competition?
UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE is the largest funder on record, with $3,750,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Partnership for Clean Competition find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing