Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Christopher Reeve Foundation

The christopher and dana reeve foundation is dedicated to curing spinal cord injury by advancing innovative research and improving quality of life for individuals and families impacted by paralysis.

$4.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
145
Grants FY2025still arriving
43
States reached
$186k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$13MEducation$9.3MRecreation & Sports$8.7MHuman Services$3.0MEmployment$1.3MScience & Tech$875kArts & Culture$860kEnvironment$392kOther$0
02FY2025 · 145 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 145 grants below total $3,860,691 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,187,651 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $326,960 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k125 grants · $2.9M
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $945k
$24,800
Median grant
43
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PSYCHOGENICS INC$185,950
ADAPTIVE FITNESS LEGION$100,000
UPSTATE-CAROLINA ADAPTIVE GOLF$100,000
CUTTING FENCES FOUNDATION$98,826
NEUROWORX-DR DALE B HULL FOUNDATION FOR NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION INC$87,250
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$67,500
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$55,000
SCIBOSTON$50,000
ATLANTIS COMMUNITY INCADAPT (CIL)$50,000
ACCESS TO INDEPENDENCE INC (CIL)$50,000
SHAKE-A-LEG MIAMI INC$50,000
RAMP - REGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT (CIL)$50,000
PUSHING FORWARD$40,000
RANCHO RESEARCH INSTITUTE (RANCHO LOS AMIGOS NATIONAL REHABILITATION CENTER$40,000
YUCCA VALLEY MATERIAL LAB INC$40,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CUTTING FENCES FOUNDATION: $99k → 9%TRANSITIONAL PATHS TO INDEPENDENT LIVING (TRPIL): $40k → 12%DISABILITY OPTIONS NETWORK: $25k → 13%THE JERRY AND PAULA BAKER FOUNDATION TUOLUMNE TRAILS: $39k → 14%ANGEL CITY SPORTS: $25k → 14%NEW BEGINNINGS COMMUNITY CENTER: $30k → 7%CUTTING FENCES FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%TRANSITIONAL PATHS TO INDEPENDENT LIVING (TRPIL): $25k → 12%WESTCHESTER INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER (CIL): $25k → 9%ADAPT ABILITY INC: $25k → 20%SILICON VALLEY INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER (CIL): $40k → 8%MISSION TO ASSIST AND PROVIDE FOR SENIORS (MAPS CHARITIES): $25k → 14%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%COMMUNITIES ACTIVELY LIVING INDEPENDENT & FREE (CALIF): $40k → 14%COMMUNITIES ACTIVELY LIVING INDEPENDENT & FREE (CALIF) (CIL): $40k → 14%COMMUNITIES ACTIVELY LIVING INDEPENDENT & FREE (CALIF) (CIL): $40k → 14%NEURO FITNESS FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%GRACE RIDES INC: $25k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25k → 14%BLOC LIFE INC: $25k → 8%ACCESS II INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER (CIL): $25k → 15%ON MY OWN INC: $50k → 18%ACCESS TO INDEPENDENCE INC (CIL): $50k → 10%HORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES DBA TECHACCESS OF RI: $75k → 14%ROADS TO INDEPENDENCE: $50k → 9%CENTER FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $40k → 12%SERVICES FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $50k → 17%JOYCE L SOBEL FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER (AKA SAN JUAN ISLAND FAMILY RESOURCE: $40k → 10%KESSLER FOUNDATION: $28k → 4%HANDI-WHEELS TRANSPORTATION: $30k → 12%FREE- FOUNDATION FOR REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT & ENDOWMENT: $40k → 8%LOUISIANA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY ACCESS NETWORK (LATAN): $100k → 19%INDEPENDENCE PLACE (CIL): $50k → 15%SCIBOSTON: $50k → 8%UPSTATE-CAROLINA ADAPTIVE GOLF: $100k → 10%DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC (CIL): $30k → 9%INDEPENDENCEFIRST (CIL): $40k → 17%CENTER FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES (CIL): $40k → 12%SERVICES FOR INDEPEDENT LIVING: $29k → 17%RYAN HOUSE: $30k → 11%ART SPARKS TEXAS: $75k → 10%DISABILITYSA: $30k → 16%INDEPENDENCE FIRST (CIL): $40k → 17%PATSY REEVE FOUNDATION: $40k → 11%NEW HORIZONS INC: $30k → 11%MOUNTING HORIZONS INC: $50k → 16%ATLANTIS COMMUNITY INCADAPT (CIL): $50k → 12%ABILITY360 (CIL): $40k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$20M · 189 repeat orgs$18M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

189 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2025, 133 since wound down; 89 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

189
709

Total granted

$20M
$16M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+18%

Still filing today

87%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Louisville Research Foundation
    6× · 2017–2022 · $6.8M · revenue +61%
  • UO
    University of Miami
    9× · 2017–2025 · $412k · revenue +96%
  • TJ
    THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $359k · revenue +164%

Funded once

  • LW
    LIFE WATERSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +58% · 62% of their budget
  • MU
    Marquette University
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +24%
  • PI
    PEOPLE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Accessible Alpine Adventure Tours
Health
2
Alliance of Disability Advocates

To serve all north carolinians with significant disabilities by ensuring they can live independently in a barrier-free community of their choice through consumer-controlled, self-directed services.

Religion
3
National Ability Center

The national ability center (the center) empowers individuals with disabilities by building self-esteem, confidence and lifetime skills through sport, recreation and educational programs.

Recreation & Sports
4
Summit Adaptive Sports Inc

The organization's goal is to foster a healthy lifestyle through outdoor sports for individuals with disabilities in a fun, accessible, and inclusive environment.

Human Services
5
Via Rehabilitation Services Inc

Our mission is to empower people with disabilities and their families to grow, develop, and thrive by providing essential skill-building, therapeutic, and recreational programs.

Health
6
Center for Disabilities

Independent living service to disabled clients including information and referral, advocacy, peer counseling, il skills training, housing, employment, ramp installation, emergency rent, utilities and food.

Human Services
7
Cerebral Palsy Inc

Celebrating all abilities and unlocking potential.

Health
8
Accessible Resources for Independence Inc

The mission is to maximize the independence of people with disabilities so they enjoy self-directed, productive lives.

Human Services
9
Dakotabilities Inc

Together, we create a warm and welcoming community enriching the lives of those we support.

Human Services
10
Center for Independence Inc

The Center for Independence promotes community solutions and empowers individuals with disabilities to live independently.

Human Services
11
Colorado Springs Independence Center

We work with people with disabilities, their families and the community to create independence so that all may thrive.

Human Services
12
Aspire Inc

We empower adults with disabilities to lead fulfilling lives. We are committed to creating a community where all people are valued and accepted.

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is ABILITY360 Inc and the most unlike its peers is Madison Art Gallery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports ProgramsDevelopmental Disabilities …Environmental Conservation …Equine Therapy ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …Cancer Support ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportCommunity Arts CentersSenior Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterDance Arts OrganizationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyChristian Youth CampsLgbtq+ Community SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Local Food System Organizat…Christian Missionary Organi…Domestic Violence ServicesYmca Youth DevelopmentIndependent K-12 SchoolsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Development CentersYouth Mentoring ProgramsJewish Community Organizati…Community FoundationsImmigrant Worker SupportLocal History MuseumsPublic Library OperationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community College Foundatio…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%6%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%39%35–55yr16%16%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%9/989
the rest of the field
13%
240,387/1,818,576

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

810 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 810 of the 989 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

35
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
213
Early backer (in before they grew)
790/810
Grantees still filing
560/810
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Louisville Research Foundation — $6,814,213 · EducationUniversity of Louisville Research Foundatio…University of Miami — $411,986 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $358,846 · Education+16 more — $1,316,883 · Education+16 moreMETHODIST HOSPITAL — $642,078 · OtherMETHODIST HOSPITALREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE — $637,500 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFO…PSYCHOGENICS INC — $468,500 · OtherPSYCHOGENICS INCUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $400,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTON — $246,134 · Other+71 more — $4,829,548 · Other+71 moreHENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE — $286,987 · HealthHENRY M JACKSO…NATIONAL REHABILITATION HOSPITAL — $124,999 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $119,025 · HealthALS UNITED GREATER CHICAGO — $112,560 · HealthTHE DR DALE B HULL FOUNDATION FOR NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION INC — $112,250 · Health+40 more — $2,286,869 · Health+40 moreCUTTING FENCES FOUNDATION — $123,826 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITIES ACTIVELY LIVING INDEPENDENT & FREE — $120,000 · Human ServicesUPSTATE CAROLINA ADAPTIVE GOLF — $112,000 · Human ServicesINDEPENDENCE FIRST INC — $104,999 · Human ServicesLOUISIANA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY ACCESS NETWORK — $100,000 · Human Services+39 more — $2,000,654 · Human Services+39 moreADAPTIVE FITNESS LEGION — $121,750 · Recreation & SportsInclusion Matters by Shanes Inspiration — $100,000 · Recreation & SportsADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM OF OHIO — $100,000 · Recreation & SportsCatalyst Sports Inc — $65,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP TWIN LAKES INC — $63,950 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES ADAPTIVE RECREATION CENTER — $50,000 · Recreation & SportsBRIDGE II SPORTS INC — $49,999 · Recreation & SportsCalifornia Aquatic Therapy & Wellness Center Inc — $49,999 · Recreation & SportsPALMS TO PINES PARASPORTS — $49,999 · Recreation & SportsTRAIL ACCESS PROJECT — $45,072 · Recreation & SportsThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $300,000 · Science & TechUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc — $75,000 · Science & TechABLE SOUTH CAROLINA INC — $90,000 · PhilanthropyIllinois Assistive Technology Program — $74,935 · PhilanthropySabrina Cohen Foundation Inc — $41,000 · PhilanthropyIM ABLE FOUNDATION — $40,000 · Philanthropy
Education$8,901,928Other$7,223,760Health$3,042,690Human Services$2,561,479Recreation & Sports$695,769Science & Tech$375,000Philanthropy$245,935

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Louisville Research Foundation — $6,814,213 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $411,986 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $358,846 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $300,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE — $286,987 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL REHABILITATION HOSPITAL — $124,999 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetADAPTIVE FITNESS LEGION — $121,750 over 2y, 65% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $121,441 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES ACTIVELY LIVING INDEPENDENT & FREE — $120,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $119,025 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALS UNITED GREATER CHICAGO — $112,560 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetTHE DR DALE B HULL FOUNDATION FOR NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION INC — $112,250 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetUPSTATE CAROLINA ADAPTIVE GOLF — $112,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $110,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $105,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINDEPENDENCE FIRST INC — $104,999 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE WATERS — $100,000 over 1y, 62% of budgetMarquette University — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM OF OHIO — $100,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetLOUISIANA ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY ACCESS NETWORK — $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCraig Hospital Foundation — $99,999 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $99,961 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $99,891 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC — $99,711 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA INSTITUTE ON AGING INC — $97,585 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $97,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDisability Action Center NW Inc — $94,458 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATIONIOWA CHAPTER — $92,308 over 1y, 10% of budgetABLE SOUTH CAROLINA INC — $90,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetRancho Research Institute — $88,742 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSpecial Kids-Special Families Inc — $85,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetThe Whole Person Inc — $80,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES — $80,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetALS UNITED MID-ATLANTIC — $79,877 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSERVICES FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING — $78,524 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING — $75,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetHORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY RESOURCE CENTERS OF HAWAII — $75,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetNorth Dakota Assistive — $75,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetFLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR ASSISTIVE SERVICES & TECHNOLOGY INC — $75,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT INC — $74,989 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBay Area Outreach and Recreation Program — $73,880 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetRESOURCE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCasa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare — $67,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Move UnitedAmyotrophic Lateral S…Rei Cooperative Actio…The Hanger Charitable…Dralla Foundation IncDisabled American Vet…Oliver-Hoffmann Found…Kessler Foundation IncInnovating Worthy Pro…Disabled Veterans Nat…The Doug Flutie Jr Fo…Special People in Need
Move UnitedMD111.9× affinity66 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Move United · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assn · Rei Cooperative Action Fund · The Hanger Charitable Foundation · Dralla Foundation Inc · Disabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust · Oliver-Hoffmann Foundation · Kessler Foundation Inc · Innovating Worthy Projects Foundation · Disabled Veterans National Foundation · The Doug Flutie Jr Foundation for Autism Inc · Special People in Need

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Christopher Reeve Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 44%
  • Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine — 100% of income from government
  • Community Vision Inc — 92% of income from government
  • Triangle Inc — 90% of income from government
  • South Florida Institute On Aging Inc — 69% of income from government
  • Center for Medicare Advocacy Inc — 63% of income from government
  • Kessler Foundation Inc — 54% of income from government
  • Abilitree — 44% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Bay Area Center for Independent Living Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Cheshire Home Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Gaylord Hospital Inc — 6% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • New Horizons Inc — 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
45report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
6rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 989 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines