How much did Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation grant in FY2025?

Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation reported 27 grants totaling $13,453,975 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation based?

Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation is based in IL.

Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation

The Foundation is an organization committed to making a positive impact by supporting the well-being of women and teens in under-resourced communities in the U.S.

$13M

Granted FY2025

Grants

—

Communities

$5.5M

Largest

01What you fund

0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$33MInternational$13MHuman Services$3.4MHealth$1.1MArts & Culture$850kYouth Development$773kEducation$731kCivil Rights$580kPhilanthropy$330kOther$4.7M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

—

2022

glam goodchinesecreate

2023

earlylgbtq youthyoungsucceedfreesafepersonal

2024

lgbtq youthyounggirlssafepersonalfreeunsafe because

2025

afutpmpimpoverishedgirlsyoungveterancovenantadvocacy

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k2 grants · $16k
$10k–50k3 grants · $75k
$50k–250k10 grants · $1.0M
$250k+12 grants · $11M

$200,000

Median grant

—

States reached

$3.0M

Total assets

Largest grants

THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC$5,489,127
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF AMERICA$2,512,336
YWCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$551,500
DRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE$500,000
ACTIVE MINDS INC$350,000
Girls Inc$350,000
COVENANT HOUSE$350,000
The JED Foundation$350,000
COMMERCIAL CLUB FOUNDATION$250,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC$250,000
American Red Cross$250,000
THE ADLER PLANETARIUM$250,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO$200,000
STEP UP WOMEN'S NETWORK$200,000
APIA SCHOLARS$100,512

02Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$57M · 34 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

34 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$57M

$478k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%

+72%

Still filing today

97%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationCivil RightsInternationalPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
6× · 2020–2025 · $33M · revenue +49%
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC
6× · 2020–2025 · $11M · revenue +21%
BB
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF AMERICA
3× · 2023–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +9%

Funded once

M
Mindsgraduated
one grant, 2024 · $350k · revenue +72%
TC
THE CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +353%
START EARLYgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $22k · revenue +141%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Global Fund for Children

To advance the rights and opportunities of children and youth worldwide.

Arts & Culture

American Jewish World Service Inc

We work to realize human rights and end poverty in africa, asia, latin america and the caribbean.

International

National Council of Jewish Women

Inspired by jewish values, the national council of jewish women is a grassroots organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children, and families, and by safeguarding…

Community Improvement

Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education

Youthbuild Usa Inc

To create a world where all young people are seen for their potentialwith love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild…

Employment

Girls for Gender Equity Inc

Works intergenerationally, through a black feminist lens, to achieve gender and racial justice.

Crime & Legal

Abilities Network Inc

To cultivate inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.

Health

Out & Equal

Social Science

The Common Application Inc

The common application promotes access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process.

Education

International Aids Vaccine

Translate scientific discoveries into affordable, globally accessible public health solutions

International

Options for All Inc

To create and support opportunities for individuals with idd in making choices to live, work, and love lifein their community with dignity and respect

Employment

American Gas Association

American gas association (the association) is an advocate for natural gas utility companies and their customers. the association helps natural gas utilities achieve operational excellence in the safe, reliable and efficient delivery of…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dress for Success Worldwide and the most unlike its peers is Start Early. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/51

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,514

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

50 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

50/50

Grantees still filing

40/50

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Public Safety & Disaster$32,899,260International$12,883,196Other$6,290,884Human Services$3,401,500Health$1,075,000Arts & Culture$850,000Youth Development$772,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY22.2× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Tides Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · AbbVie Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Allstate Foundation · Pwc Foundation Inc · The Coca-Cola Foundation Inc · Polk Bros Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Girls Inc.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~6 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.1× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 814491475 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Girls Inc, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 15% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

50 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation?

More from the funding graph

Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

50 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation?

More from the funding graph