Skip to content
Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation

The Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation is an organization committed to making a positive impact by supporting the well-being of women and teens in under-resourced communities in the u.s.

$13M
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$5.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02Its granteesRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$34MInternational$12MYouth Development$3.9MEducation$1.7MHuman Services$1.6MHousing & Shelter$1.1MCivil Rights$783kEmployment$626kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 27 grants below total $12,551,975, the rows itemized in this filing. The $13,453,975 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $902,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+12 grants · $11M
$200,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC$5,489,127
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF AMERICA$2,512,336
YWCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$551,500
DRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE$500,000
Girls Inc$350,000
COVENANT HOUSE$350,000
The JED Foundation$350,000
ACTIVE MINDS INC$350,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC$250,000
American Red Cross$250,000
COMMERCIAL CLUB FOUNDATION$250,000
THE ADLER PLANETARIUM$250,000
STEP UP WOMEN'S NETWORK$200,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO$200,000
APIA SCHOLARS$100,512
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$57M · 34 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
9

Total granted

$57M
$478k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+13%

Still filing today

97%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCivil RightsInternationalPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $33M · revenue +34%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11M · revenue +14%
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    3× · 2023–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +3% · 41% of their budget

Funded once

  • CN
    Charity Navigator
    one grant, 2024 · $350k · revenue +13%
  • TC
    THE CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +40%
  • START EARLY
    one grant, 2023 · $22k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
2
Out & Equal

To provide leadership and professional development, education and research to create workplaces free from discrimination.

Social Science
3
Child Welfare League of America

Child welfare league of america engages its network of public and private agencies and partners to advance policies, best practices, and collaborative strategies that result in better outcomes for vulnerable children, youth, and families.

Human Services
4
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
5
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
6
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
7
City Year Inc

City year helps students and schools succeed, while preparing the next generation of civically engaged leaders who can work across lines of difference. partnering with teachers, teams of city year americorps members cultivate learning…

Unclassified
8
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
9
Chicago United

To achieve parity in economic opportunity for people of color by advancing multiracial leadership in corporate governance, expanding the talent pipline for executive-level management, and growing minority businesses.

Philanthropy
10
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
11
American Association of University Women Inc

Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.

Education
12
Citizen Schools Inc

In fiscal year 2025, the agency operated an americorps maker fellowship, placing 7 americorps vista members at 6 different education focused organizations in ca, ma, and ny. americorps members worked on capacity building projects to expand…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is After School Matters Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Un Techo Para Mi Pais Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/50
Grantees still filing
26/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $32,899,260 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCSave The Children Federation Inc: $10,908,683 · InternationalSave The Children Federat…DRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE: $1,902,013 · InternationalDRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWI…+2 more: $72,500 · InternationalBIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $3,012,336 · OtherBIG BROTHERS…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO: $641,500 · OtherCOMMUNITIES …THE COMMERCIAL CLUB FOUNDATION: $250,000 · OtherPFLAG: $217,500 · OtherDONORSCHOOSEORG: $390,000 · OtherDONORSCHOOSE…CENTERLINK INC: $250,000 · Other+22 more: $1,529,548 · Other+22 moreYWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $1,151,500 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $950,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $550,000 · Human ServicesCharity Navigator: $350,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $150,000 · Human Services+5 more: $250,000 · Human ServicesTHE JED FOUNDATION: $700,000 · HealthActive Minds Inc: $350,000 · Health+1 more: $25,000 · HealthSTEP UP WOMEN'S NETWORK: $600,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ADLER PLANETARIUM: $250,000 · Arts & CultureGIRLS INC OF CHICAGO: $700,000 · Youth DevelopmentIMENTOR INC: $65,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $7,500 · Youth Development
Public Safety & Disaster$32,899,260International$12,883,196Other$6,290,884Human Services$3,401,500Health$1,075,000Arts & Culture$850,000Youth Development$772,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $32,899,260 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $10,908,683 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $3,012,336 over 3y, 41% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE: $1,902,013 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetYWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $1,151,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $950,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS INC OF CHICAGO: $700,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $700,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO: $641,500 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetSTEP UP WOMEN'S NETWORK: $600,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $550,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $390,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetActive Minds Inc: $350,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCharity Navigator: $350,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetTHE ADLER PLANETARIUM: $250,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE COMMERCIAL CLUB FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCENTERLINK INC: $250,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetPFLAG: $217,500 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC: $200,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPOINT FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIOLA Foundation: $150,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetGlam4Good Foundation: $130,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetGLSEN INC: $125,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services: $101,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $100,512 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTRUE COLORS UNITED INC: $100,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMENTOR INC: $65,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE: $51,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEQUALITY ILLINOIS: $50,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetBLUE STAR FAMILIES INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLEARBROOK: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYouth Guidance: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChinese for Affirmative Action: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSTART EARLY: $21,836 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Conscious Kid: $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetYWCA USA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHISPANIC ALLIANCE FOR CAREER ENHANCEMENT: $11,200 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSKILLS FOR CHICAGO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA WOMAN'S NATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMARTIN LUTHER KING JR CENTER INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Tides FoundationAbbVie FoundationCharities Aid Foundat…The Allstate Foundati…Polk Bros Foundation …Arie and Ida Crown Me…Lloyd a Fry FoundationNorthwestern Universi…The Blackbaud Giving …Pwc Foundation IncArthur J Gallagher Fo…
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY19.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Tides Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Allstate Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Northwestern University · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Pwc Foundation Inc · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Centerlink Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ulta Beauty’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home