· Private foundation
The William J J Gordon Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k114 grants · $315k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $140k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE CLEAR FUND | $30,000 |
| JACKSON HOLE CHILDRENS MUSEUM | $20,000 |
| HARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION | $15,000 |
| PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION | $12,000 |
| IMMIGRANT LEGAL ADVOCACY PROJECT | $12,000 |
| 13 HANDS EQUINE RESCUE INC | $10,500 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE TEXAS CAPITAL REGION INC | $10,000 |
| TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW | $10,000 |
| A MAINEHEALTH HCSR | $10,000 |
| HARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION | $10,000 |
| MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC | $9,500 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY ALLIANCE OF SOUTHERN MAINE | $8,000 |
| THORNE ECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE | $7,500 |
| OREGON MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY | $7,500 |
| SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC | $6,664 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $175k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
127 repeat relationships — 100 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WSWAYNFLETE SCHOOL5× · 2020–2024 · $55k · revenue +57%
- GSGood Shepherd Food Bank5× · 2020–2024 · $54k · revenue +50%
- JHJackson Hole Childrens Museum Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $48k · revenue +470%
Funded once
- IIIsland Instituteone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -3%
- HCHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $19k · revenue +105%
- PIPEAKS ISLAND TAX ASSISTANCEone grant, 2022 · $12k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.
Maine Farmland Trust protects farmland, supports farmers, and advances the future of farming.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.
The mission of Islesboro Islands Trust is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all residents as to the value of the island's natural ecosystems, and act as an environmental advocate on…
The mission of the mount desert land & garden preserve is to conserve and share the beauty of our historic lands and gardens.
To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.
Secure a sustainable future for fisheries and fishing communities in Eastern Maine and beyond.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.
The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evidence Action and the most unlike its peers is Lucky Pup Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
172 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 172 of the 206 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WAYNFLETE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Good Shepherd Food Bank ↗
- Who funds Jackson Hole Childrens Museum Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CLEAR FUND ↗
- Who funds PREBLE STREET ↗
- Who funds Portland Museum of Art ↗
- Who funds THORNE ECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds OREGON MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY ↗
- Who funds MaineHealth ↗
- Who funds HARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT LEGAL ADVOCACY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE LIVESTOCK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds 13 HANDS EQUINE RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds SAIL MAINE ↗
- Who funds LET GROW INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds EMANCIPET INC ↗
- Who funds NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds IMPACT NW ↗
- Who funds Jewish Community Alliance Southern Maine ↗
- Who funds The Girls Foundation of Tanzania ↗
- Who funds CARITAS OF AUSTIN ↗
- Who funds Maine Public Broadcasting Corporation ↗
- Who funds The Telling Room ↗
- Who funds The Against Malaria Foundation ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MAINE ↗
- Who funds GOULD ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Arundel Conservation Trust ↗
- Who funds Island Institute ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Saco & Biddeford Savings Charitable Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Virginia Hodgkins Somers Foundation Inc · Onion Foundation · Kennebunk Savings Bank Foundation · John T Gorman Foundation · Atlantic Federal Credit Union Foundation · United Way Inc · Simmons Foundation - PerkinsThompson
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The William J J Gordon Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Adelante Mujeres — 31% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- New Avenues for Youth Inc — 20% of income from government
- Impact Nw — 8% of income from government
- Raw Art Works Inc — 7% of income from government
- Oregon Museum of Science and Industry — 4% of income from government
- Discovery Museum Inc — 3% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Red Sox Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc — 1% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Clearwater Marine Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
- Portland Art Museum — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Public Broadcasting — 1% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The William J J Gordon Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The William J J Gordon Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.