Skip to content
The William G Irwin Charity Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The William G Irwin Charity Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$11M
Granted FY2024still arriving
117
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$8.3MHealth$8.1MFood & Nutrition$7.6MHuman Services$7.3MHousing & Shelter$3.5MArts & Culture$2.1MYouth Development$1.9MReligion$1.8MOther$0
02FY2024 · 117 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $668k
  • $50k–250k86 grants · $8.2M
  • $250k+7 grants · $2.0M
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$115M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUMEN CHRISTI ACADEMIES OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIO$400,000
CHILDREN'S DAY SCHOOL$300,000
ST MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$275,000
SAN FRANCISCO UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL$250,000
SAN FRANCISCO UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL$250,000
DYNAMIC COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS$250,000
THE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT$250,000
VITALANT FOUNDATION$200,000
SUN STREET CENTERS$200,000
RITTER CENTER$200,000
CHILD START INCORPORATED$200,000
A BETTER WAY INC$200,000
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION$200,000
NATIVE AMERICAN HEALTH CENTER INC$200,000
COMMUNITY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP DBA HOMERISE$200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $5.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $200k → 10%CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $20k → 11%SUN STREET CENTERS: $200k → 12%LIFE STEPS FOUNDATION INC: $96k → 14%CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $10k → 15%PARTNERS AND ADVOCATES FOR REMARKABLE CHILDREN AND ADULTS: $30k → 7%LIVING ROOM CENTER INC: $150k → 9%COLLABRIA CARE: $75k → 9%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $150k → 10%YOLO CRISIS NURSERY INC: $150k → 16%INADVANCE: $150k → 10%PRADER-WILLI HOMES OF CALIFORNIA: $100k → 8%PEDIATRIC DENTAL INITIATIVE OF THE NORTH COAST INC: $40k → 10%HOMELESS CHILDRENS NETWORK: $19k → 10%MOUNT ST JOSEPH - ST ELIZABETH (EPIPHANY CENTER): $250k → 10%MOUNT ST JOSEPH-ST ELIZABETH: $225k → 10%REACH FOR HOME: $150k → 9%ALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE: $200k → 10%INSTITUTE ON AGING: $100k → 10%MY NEW RED SHOES: $50k → 7%BECOMING INDEPENDENT: $150k → 9%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $100k → 9%FORGET ME NOT CHILDRENS SERVICES: $44k → 9%ELDER CARE ALLIANCE: $50k → 10%KUALOA-HEEIA ECUMENICAL YOUTH PROJECT: $100k → 9%ABUNDANT GRACE COASTSIDE WORKER INC: $23k → 7%NORTH BAY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $50k → 8%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $150k → 10%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $113k → 9%SOCIETY OF STVINCENT DE PAUL OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $41k → 10%HEBREW HOME FOR AGED DISABLED: $224k → 10%VIVALON: $250k → 8%A BETTER WAY INC: $200k → 10%BERKELEY FOOD AND HOUSING PROJECT: $150k → 10%MERCY RETIREMENT AND CARE CENTER: $350k → 10%SUPPORT LIFE FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $100k → 10%CURRY SENIOR CENTER: $100k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 10%POMEROY RECREATION AND REHABILITATION CENTER: $75k → 10%DRY DOCK CORPORATION: $30k → 10%FAMILY CONNECTIONS CENTERS: $50k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $190k → 10%CITY HOPE SAN FRANCISCO: $100k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $48k → 10%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $100k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO SAFEHOUSE: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The William G Irwin Charity Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 81%.

The William G Irwin Charity Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 35 repeat orgs$30M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 68 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
197

Total granted

$17M
$22M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+15%

Still filing today

83%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +10%
  • ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +39%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • HH
    HANA HEALTH
    one grant, 2023 · $600k · revenue -12%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +24%
  • OL
    OAKLAND LITERACY COALITION
    one grant, 2021 · $350k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
3
The Health Trust

The mission is to build health equity in silicon valley.

Health
4
Serra Residential Center Inc

To provide dignity, respect and choice for persons with developmental disabilities

—
5
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
6
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
7
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
8
Mission Hospice & Home Care Inc

Delivering compassionate support and exceptional care in the home for individuals and communities, guiding them with choice and dignity to navigate significant care decisions.

Human Services
9
Community Housing Sonoma County

Community Housing Sonoma County creates supportive housing communities for people living with disabling conditions, especially veterans.

Housing & Shelter
10
Housing Choices Coalition for Persons With Developmental Disabilities Inc

To enhance the lives of people with developmental and other disabilities by creating quality, affordable housing options.

Housing & Shelter
11
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
12
Santa Cruz Community Health Centers

Our mission is to improve the health of our patients and the community and advocate the feminist goals of social, political, & economic equality.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Compass Family Services; the most unlike its peers is Lunalilo Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

238 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 238 of the 300 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
237/238
Grantees still filing
158/238
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ANTHONY FOUNDATION: $1,310,000 · OtherST ANTHONY FOUNDATIONSTANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $1,250,000 · OtherSTANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINESAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $1,100,000 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $1,060,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION: $880,000 · OtherTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $800,000 · Other+90 more: $14,817,157 · Other+90 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $500,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARIT…Mount St Joseph-St Elizabeth: $474,700 · Human ServicesMount St Joseph…COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $350,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE …MERCY RETIREMENT AND CARE CENTER: $350,000 · Human ServicesMERCY RETIREMEN…Vivalon: $250,000 · Human ServicesTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $250,000 · Human ServicesHEBREW HOME FOR AGED DISABLED: $223,865 · Human ServicesWHITE PONY EXPRESS: $212,583 · Human ServicesA BETTER WAY INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesBAY AREA RESCUE MISSION: $200,000 · Human ServicesRITTER CENTER: $200,000 · Human ServicesSUN STREET CENTERS: $200,000 · Human ServicesALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE: $200,000 · Human Services+20 more: $2,386,301 · Human Services+20 moreST MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $475,000 · HealthST MARY'S M…CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $350,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA …MERCY FOUNDATION: $300,000 · HealthMERCY FOUND…WOODLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION DBA WOODLAND HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $262,288 · HealthWOODLAND ME…Kapi'olani Health Foundation: $250,000 · HealthKapi'olani …Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California: $250,000 · HealthOrder of Ma…PACIFIC VISION FOUNDATION: $241,714 · HealthPACIFIC VIS…SAINT FRANCIS FOUNDATION: $200,000 · HealthVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE - SAN FRANCISCO: $200,000 · HealthAGEWELL PACE: $187,805 · Health+16 more: $1,811,644 · Health+16 moreSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $1,000,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HAR…FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $1,000,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK …HAWAII FOODBANK INC: $680,000 · Food & NutritionHAWAII FOO…MAUI FOOD BANK INC: $400,000 · Food & NutritionMAUI FOOD …THE FOOD BASKET INC: $385,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FOOD B…+6 more: $551,991 · Food & Nutrition+6 moreSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA: $525,000 · EducationSAINT MAR…SAN FRANCISCO UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $500,000 · EducationSAN FRANC…THE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $250,000 · EducationTHE COLLE…CRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL: $219,376 · EducationCRISTO RE…CALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF MECHANICAL ARTS: $200,000 · EducationCALIFORNI…CHILD START INC: $200,000 · EducationCHILD STA…University of San Francisco: $200,000 · EducationUniversit…DUNN SCHOOL: $200,000 · EducationDUNN SCHO…UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $200,000 · EducationUNIVERSIT…GATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $187,707 · EducationHIDDEN GENIUS PROJECT: $125,000 · Education+8 more: $775,000 · Education+8 moreSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $605,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $380,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $380,000 · Arts & CultureCURIODYSSEY: $300,000 · Arts & CultureYERBA BUENA CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $100,000 · Arts & CultureMAUI ACADEMY OF PERFORMING ARTS: $100,000 · Arts & CultureCultura y Arte Nativa De Las Americas: $100,000 · Arts & CultureCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $75,000 · Arts & CultureBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $500,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE ZONES: $221,635 · Youth DevelopmentDemeo Teen Club Inc: $207,985 · Youth DevelopmentSALESIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $120,000 · Youth DevelopmentLOTUS BLOOM: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH SPEAKS INC: $100,000 · Youth Development
Other$21,217,157Human Services$5,997,449Health$4,528,451Food & Nutrition$4,016,991Education$3,582,083Arts & Culture$2,040,000Youth Development$1,399,620

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $1,100,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $1,060,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $1,000,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $1,000,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $800,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $680,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $605,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHANA HEALTH: $600,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA: $525,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $500,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $500,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $500,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetST MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $475,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetMount St Joseph-St Elizabeth: $474,700 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $400,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetHomeward Bound of Marin: $400,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE REDWOODS A COMMUNITY OF SENIORS: $400,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE FOOD BASKET INC: $385,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $380,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $380,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $350,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $350,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMERCY RETIREMENT AND CARE CENTER: $350,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $350,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCURIODYSSEY: $300,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S DAY SCHOOL INC: $300,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMERCY FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetALOHA UNITED WAY INC: $275,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetWOODLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION DBA WOODLAND HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $262,288 over 1y, 19% of budgetVivalon: $250,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetKATHERINE DELMAR BURKE SCHOOL: $250,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $250,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetKapi'olani Health Foundation: $250,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetOrder of Malta Clinic of Northern California: $250,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $250,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetDYNAMIC COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS: $250,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSWORDS TO PLOWSHARES VETERANS RIGHTS ORGANIZATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPACIFIC VISION FOUNDATION: $241,714 over 1y, 16% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $234,586 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWomens Recovery ServicesA Unique Place: $226,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetCONSERVATION CORPS NORTH BAY INC: $225,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHEBREW HOME FOR AGED DISABLED: $223,865 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ZONES: $221,635 over 1y, 24% of budgetCRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL: $219,376 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWHITE PONY EXPRESS: $212,583 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetDemeo Teen Club Inc: $207,985 over 1y, 17% of budgetYOUTH EMPLOYMENT PARTNERSHIP INC: $200,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF MECHANICAL ARTS: $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bothin FoundationMcNabb FoundationThe San Francisco Fou…Marin Community Found…Kaiser Foundation Hos…East Bay Community Fo…Sutter Bay HospitalsSonoma County Communi…The Joseph and Vera L…Jewish Community Fede…Tipping Point Communi…Heffernan Group Found…
Bothin FoundationCA118.5× affinity61 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bothin Foundation · McNabb Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · East Bay Community Foundation · Sutter Bay Hospitals · Sonoma County Community Foundation · The Joseph and Vera Long Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Tipping Point Community · Heffernan Group Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The William G Irwin Charity Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The William G Irwin Charity Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    88report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 300 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William G Irwin Charity’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home