Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Wildflower Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
62
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$680k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$9.6MEnvironment$5.8MFood & Nutrition$5.1MArts & Culture$4.2MHousing & Shelter$2.0MEducation$1.9MAnimals$1.7MPhilanthropy$1.2MOther$0
02FY2025 · 62 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k35 grants · $929k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $1.8M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.7M
$40,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$65M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSIC WILL$680,194
MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND$389,856
HOPEWELL FUND$300,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$280,000
HOSPEACE HOUSE INC$221,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$180,000
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE$120,000
EARTHJUSTICE$120,000
FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA$110,000
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTIST$110,000
BOSTON UNIVERSITY$100,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$92,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA$85,000
CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL$80,000
NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$80,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $20k → 10%HOSPEACE HOUSE INC: $300k → 10%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $9k → 6%LEARNING ALLY: $20k → 11%CHRYSALIS SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC: $5k → 11%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $15k → 10%HOSPEACE HOUSE INC: $221k → 10%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $7k → 6%LEARNING ALLY: $20k → 11%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $10k → 10%HOSPEACE HOUSE INC: $110k → 10%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $5k → 6%LEARNING ALLY: $20k → 11%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $10k → 10%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $5k → 6%LEARNING ALLY: $15k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $50k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $45k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $45k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $45k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $45k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $40k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $30k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $30k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $27k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $25k → 15%MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND & VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $400k → 15%MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $390k → 15%MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND & VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $350k → 15%MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND & VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $261k → 15%MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND & VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $250k → 15%MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $146k → 15%MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $104k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
SC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$29M · 69 repeat orgs$3.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

69 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

69
10

Total granted

$29M
$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+8%

Still filing today

74%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $349k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MW
    MUSIC WILL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +4% · 25% of their budget
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +79%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • TM
    THE MUSHROOM FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $3.0M
  • LH
    LOTUS HOUSE SHELTER THE SUNDARI
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
3
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
4
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
5
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
6
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
7
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
8
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
9
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
10
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
11
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
12
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Hospeace House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Environmental Conservation …Health Access Advocacy and …Dance Arts OrganizationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Policy Research and AdvocacyYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterLgbtq+ Community SupportFood Banks and PantriesPregnancy Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%34%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/62
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,503

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/62
Grantees still filing
47/62
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE MUSHROOM FUND — $3,000,000 · OtherTHE MUSHROOM FUNDTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,920,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYBOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AMYLOIDOSIS TREATMENT & RESEARCH PROG — $900,000 · OtherBOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AMYLOIDOSIS TREA…BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF — $750,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $750,000 · OtherMIAMI CANCER INSTITUTE — $740,000 · OtherLOTUS HOUSE SHELTER THE SUNDARI FOUNDATION — $620,000 · OtherTeach for America Inc — $640,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $750,000 · OtherLOTUS ENDOWMENT FUND INC — $1,000,000 · OtherLOTUS ENDOWMENT FUND INCHOPEWELL FUND — $800,000 · Other+37 more — $4,636,000 · Other+37 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC — $2,175,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTH…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $1,605,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTH…CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $960,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH…+2 more — $70,000 · HealthMUSIC WILL INC — $3,438,836 · Arts & CultureMUSIC WILL I…ALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC — $214,000 · Arts & CultureALVIN AILEY …+3 more — $201,000 · Arts & CultureEARTHJUSTICE — $880,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTI…NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $801,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL P…CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $340,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATI…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $328,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILD…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $290,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RE…CERES INC — $115,000 · Environment+8 more — $598,000 · Environment+8 moreMIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC — $1,900,603 · Human ServicesMIAMI LIG…Hospeace House Inc — $631,035 · Human ServicesHospeace …CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC — $332,000 · Human ServicesCHAPMAN P…+6 more — $226,000 · Human Services+6 moreFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $1,390,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America — $496,000 · Food & NutritionZOO MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $401,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC — $332,000 · AnimalsPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC — $312,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP — $185,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC — $142,000 · AnimalsAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC — $98,000 · AnimalsDANNY & RONS RESCUE — $90,000 · Animals
Other$16,506,000Health$4,810,000Arts & Culture$3,853,836Environment$3,352,000Human Services$3,089,638Food & Nutrition$1,886,000Animals$1,560,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMUSIC WILL INC — $3,438,836 over 9y, 25% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC — $2,175,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,920,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC — $1,900,603 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $1,605,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $1,390,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetLOTUS ENDOWMENT FUND INC — $1,000,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $960,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $880,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $801,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND — $800,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $750,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $640,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHospeace House Inc — $631,035 over 3y, 61% of budgetFeeding America — $496,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $422,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetZOO MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $401,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetPATIENT ADVOCATE FOUNDATION — $400,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION — $389,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetOUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL — $387,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS — $350,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $340,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC — $332,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC — $332,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $328,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC — $312,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $290,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN — $235,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC — $214,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $210,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP — $185,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC — $142,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCHRYSALIS FOUNDATION — $119,000 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetCERES INC — $115,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $110,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA WILDFLOWER FOUNDATION INC — $101,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION — $100,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC — $98,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRARE — $97,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $92,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANNY & RONS RESCUE — $90,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budget350ORG — $81,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC — $79,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLearning Ally Inc — $75,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES — $68,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC — $67,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSIC WILL INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds LOTUS ENDOWMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds Hospeace House Inc ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ZOO MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PATIENT ADVOCATE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION ↗
  • Who funds OUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds ALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Wildflower Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Star of the Sea Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of South Florida and the Treasure Coast Inc — 6% of income from government
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Learning Ally Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Miami Lighthouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Ceres Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Chapman Partnership Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Florida Wildflower Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Zoo Miami Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Wildflower Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Wildflower Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines