Skip to content

Colorado · Private foundation

The Whitcomb Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$390k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
8
Grants FY2025
2
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$15,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$300,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 22
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
6
Total assets, FY2025
$4.4M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations The Whitcomb Charitable Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving8$390k38%
FY20242$496k0%
FY202311$235k9%
FY202211$165k9%
FY202115$200k13%
FY202018$224k11%
FY201917$220k24%
FY201822$197k14%
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$801kHealth$503kReligion$495kFood & Nutrition$131kYouth Development$80kPhilanthropy$80kRecreation & Sports$60kHuman Services$55kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MI
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
TN
DC
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 18 grantees
All grantees of The Whitcomb Charitable Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Winchester Thurston School$720,74892%
PKD Foundation$150,00070%
Coalition for Christian Outreach$135,00070%
Forest Highlands Foundation$80,0006n/a
Cancer League of Colorado Inc$80,00091%
The Fathers Friends$60,000718%
Hole in the Wall Gang Fund Inc$60,00060%
Breakthrough T1d$52,88750%
Paint for a Cure$30,00025%
The Scripps Research Institute$30,00030%
Amilia's Light Inc$30,000381%
Phoenix Symphony Association$26,99540%
Global Links$20,00020%
Matthew 25 Ministries Inc$20,00020%
St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc$20,00020%
Tidelines Institute$20,00021%
Teen Challenge of Arizona Inc$10,0002n/a
Boys & Girls Club of Greater Scottsdale Inc$10,00010%

Plus 18 recipients with no EIN on record ($754k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Whitcomb Charitable Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 16 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWinchester Thurston School: $720,748 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetPKD Foundation: $150,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCoalition for Christian Outreach: $135,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCancer League of Colorado Inc: $80,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetThe Fathers Friends: $60,000 over 7y, 18% of budgetHole in the Wall Gang Fund Inc: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBreakthrough T1d: $52,887 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPaint for a Cure: $30,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetThe Scripps Research Institute: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmilia's Light Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 81% of budgetPhoenix Symphony Association: $26,995 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGlobal Links: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTidelines Institute: $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Greater Scottsdale Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pamela Whitcomb Larsen FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pamela Whitcomb Larsen Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Whitcomb Charitable Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Whitcomb Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Whitcomb Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Whitcomb Charitable Foundation

How much does The Whitcomb Charitable Foundation give?
The Whitcomb Charitable Foundation reported 8 grants totaling $390,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 22 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does The Whitcomb Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (34%), Health (22%), Religion (21%).
Who are The Whitcomb Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Winchester Thurston School ($721k), PKD Foundation ($150k), Coalition for Christian Outreach ($135k).
Does The Whitcomb Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Whitcomb Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Whitcomb Charitable Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Pamela Whitcomb Larsen Foundation, Jpmorgan Chase Foundation, American Endowment Foundation.
Where is The Whitcomb Charitable Foundation based?
The Whitcomb Charitable Foundation is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Whitcomb’s filings →

More from the funding graph