· Private foundation
The Weil Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k43 grants · $86k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $199k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEW HANORVER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC | $20,888 |
| NUTRITION FACTS | $20,203 |
| AUDUBON SOCIETY OF NORTH CAROLINA | $15,488 |
| THE MARITIME AQUARIUM AT NORWALK INC | $15,000 |
| CONVOY OF HOPE | $15,000 |
| BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL AND EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA | $11,250 |
| HANGTIME BRIDGEPORT CAREER RESOURCES | $10,462 |
| SERIOUS FUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK | $10,395 |
| PAYPAL GIVING FUND | $10,051 |
| UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER | $10,000 |
| DUKE UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| EQUAL JUSTICED INITIATIVE | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
120 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2025, 73 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
DUKE UNIVERSITY7× · 2017–2025 · $420k · revenue +51%- TMTHE MARITIME AQUARIUM AT NORWALK INC5× · 2017–2025 · $158k · revenue +65%
- NINutritionfactsorg Inc8× · 2017–2025 · $82k · revenue +88%
Funded once
- NHNOVANT HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $25k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $10k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA - CHAPEL HILLone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.
Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.
Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Fighting Chance Ranch & Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
144 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 144 of the 245 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE MARITIME AQUARIUM AT NORWALK INC ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds Nutritionfactsorg Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW HANOVER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds GREENS LEDGE LIGHT PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CLASSROOM CENTRAL INC ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds NORWALKSTAMFORD GRASSROOTS TENNIS & EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC ↗
- Who funds The Carousel Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds DARIEN EMS POST 53 INC ↗
- Who funds NourishNC Inc ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FUND OF DARIEN ↗
- Who funds PRESENT AGE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds FLYING HORSE FARMS ↗
- Who funds CAPE FEAR COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE HALO TRUST (USA) INC ↗
- Who funds American Brain Tumor Association ↗
- Who funds HOUSING WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ASHER HOUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Landfall Foundation Inc · The Cynthia & George Mitchell Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Corning Incorporated Foundation · New Hanover Community Endowment Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Winston-Salem Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · 522 Foundation Inc · Dan Cameron Family Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Eshelman Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Weil Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- The Open Door Shelter Inc — 14% of income from government
- The Community Fund of Darien — 9% of income from government
- The Maritime Aquarium at Norwalk Inc — 5% of income from government
- Person to Person Inc — 5% of income from government
- Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
- Bikes Not Bombs Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.