· Community foundation
New Hanover Community Endowment Inc
To improve the health, education, safety, and economic opportunity of every person in our community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $121k
- $50k–250k25 grants · $3.5M
- $250k+33 grants · $57M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Cape Fear Community College Foundation Incorporated | $5,609,774 |
| New Hanover County Schools | $5,434,051 |
| YMCA of Southeastern North Carolina | $5,275,458 |
| Shelter America Group | $4,700,000 |
| Cape Fear Collective | $4,137,000 |
| Cape Fear Habitat for Humanity | $3,500,000 |
| New HOPE CDC | $2,660,000 |
| University of North Carolina at Wilmington - College of Health & Human Serv | $2,525,000 |
| New Hanover County - Administration | $2,039,364 |
| MedNorth Health Center | $2,000,000 |
| Boys & Girls Clubs of Southeastern North Carolina | $1,653,200 |
| WARM NC | $1,600,000 |
| New Hanover County District Attorney's Office | $1,429,472 |
| Communities in Schools of Cape Fear | $1,396,381 |
| A Safe Place | $1,200,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $5.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 5% of New Hanover Community Endowment Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in NC; read by stated purpose it is 95% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCAPE FEAR COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC2× · 2022–2024 · $6.1M · revenue +563% · 37% of their budget
- YMYoung Men's Christian Association of Southeastern North Carolina Inc2× · 2022–2024 · $5.5M · revenue +153% · 26% of their budget
- CICOLLECTIVE IMPACT IN NEW HANOVER COUNTY2× · 2022–2024 · $4.2M · revenue +59%
Funded once
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF RALEIGH INCone grant, 2022 · $531k
- COCITY OF WILMINGTON NCone grant, 2022 · $220k
- BEBEACON EDUCATION INCone grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue -66%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Hope Harbor Home strives to break the cycle of domestic and sexual violence in Brunswick County, North Carolina.
Safe Harbor provides a faith-based community for rebuilding, renewing, and recovery. We work together with volunteers and other nonprofit organizations to provide a wide range of services to those experiencing homelessness, single mothers,…
To promote quality nutrition and reduce food insecurities through financial and educational support in Family childcare homes and Day Care centers, while maintaining Child and Adult Care Food Program integrity.
To promote community based primary health care systems in medically underserved areas.
To operate a private school for pre-kindergarten through grade 12 in Wilmington, NC
To provide low-cost housing for those in need in Brunswick County, North Carolina.
Community Care of the Lower Cape Fear, Inc (CCLCF) serves as a health and social care hub, working in partnership with community organizations to improve health outcomes for Medicare, Medicaid, uninsured and privately insured individuals…
CTS Community Development is a behavioral health provider committed to helping individuals from underserved communities to live safe, productive, and meaningful lives
To promote the self-reliance of women by assessing needs, providing services, and acting as a gateway to community resources; to seek solutions for unmet needs by providing strategic leadership through collaboration and partnerships within…
Operation of a public charter school.
The NCAAN improves the lives of people living with HIV/AIDS and affected communities through outreach and public education, policy advocacy and community-building to increase visibility and mutual support of people living with HIV/AIDS…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cape Fear Group Homes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Masonboroorg. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 120 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CAPE FEAR COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Southeastern North Carolina Inc ↗
- Who funds SHELTER AMERICA GROUP ↗
- Who funds COLLECTIVE IMPACT IN NEW HANOVER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CAPE FEAR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds New Helping Ordinary People Excel Community Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds NEW HANOVER COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Southeastern North Carolina Inc ↗
- Who funds Wilmington Area Rebuilding Ministry Inc ↗
- Who funds Communities in Schools of Cape Fear Inc ↗
- Who funds A Safe Place Inc ↗
- Who funds YWCA of the Lower Cape Fear Inc ↗
- Who funds United Way of the Cape Fear Area Inc ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds GIRLS LEADERSHIP ACADEMY OF WILMINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NourishNC Inc ↗
- Who funds Good Shepherd Ministries of Wilmington Inc ↗
- Who funds ST MARY DENTAL CLINIC CORP ↗
- Who funds Housing Foundation of Southeastern North Carolina ↗
- Who funds Blue Ribbon Commission on the Prevention of Youth Violence ↗
- Who funds Jo Ann Carter Harrelson Center Inc ↗
- Who funds LINC INC ↗
- Who funds Coastal Horizons Center Inc ↗
- Who funds DREAMS OF WILMINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds FEAST DOWN EAST INC ↗
- Who funds CAPE FEAR CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds Domestic Violence Shelter and Services Inc ↗
- Who funds WESLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SMART START OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Eden Village of Wilmington ↗
- Who funds WELCOME HOME ANGEL INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS MAKING IT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Landfall Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Cape Fear Memorial Foundation · United Way of the Cape Fear Area Inc · Corning Incorporated Foundation · The Cynthia & George Mitchell Foundation · The Eshelman Foundation · Novant Health Inc · The Lagomarsino Foundation · The True North Foundation Co Amy Brown North · Dan Cameron Family Foundation Inc · The Myrtle and Rt Sinclair Jr Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New Hanover Community Endowment Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.