Skip to content
The United Jewish Fund and Council St Paul Jewish Federation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The United Jewish Fund and Council St Paul Jewish Federation

To unite, sustain, and enhance the st.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$360k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$7.1MPhilanthropy$4.7MReligion$2.9MCivil Rights$1.8MInternational$315kEducation$285kArts & Culture$243kYouth Development$187kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $1,717,299, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,857,998 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $140,699 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $160k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $838k
  • $250k+2 grants · $705k
$45,514
Median grant
2
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$359,548
JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL$345,832
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ST PAUL$204,466
JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA$159,698
TEMPLE OF AARON$153,966
SHOLOM FOUNDATION$136,589
MOUNT ZION TEMPLE$100,456
HILLEL FOUNDATION$83,120
HEILICHER MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH DAY SCHOOL$45,514
BETH JACOB CONGREGATION$30,152
MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION$27,927
SIX POINTS THEATER$19,950
MAAYANOT COMMUNITY MIKVEH OF MINNESOTA$15,000
TALMUD TORAH$11,791
HERZL CAMP FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ST PAUL: $372k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ST PAUL: $348k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ST PAUL: $321k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ST PAUL: $274k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ST PAUL: $204k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION: $16k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ST PAUL: $204k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ST PAUL: $199k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION: $6k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ST PAUL: $196k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ST PAUL: $172k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $584k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $570k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $554k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $479k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $418k → 14%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING: $6k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $7k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $193k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $140k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $137k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $91k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $85k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $55k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $24k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $21k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of The United Jewish Fund and Council St Paul Jewish Federation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The United Jewish Fund and Council St Paul Jewish Federationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 25 repeat orgs$216k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
14

Total granted

$14M
$201k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+0%

Still filing today

84%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureInternationalEducationReligionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA AND THE DAKOTAS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +307%
  • MH
    MINNESOTA HILLEL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $859k · revenue +95%
  • SF
    SHOLOM FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $745k · revenue +204%

Funded once

  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH EL
    one grant, 2020 · $43k
  • BT
    BEND THE ARC JEWISH ACTION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -72%
  • NS
    NEGOTIATION STRATEGIES INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
The Jewish Studio Project

Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.

Religion
3
The Jewish Publication Society

Our mission has always been to enhance jewish literacy through the publication of great books.

—
4
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
5
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
6
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
7
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
8
Hillel Jewish University Center

To enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

—
9
Memorial Foundation for Jewish Culture

Mfjc's purpose is the development of the social capital of the jewish people, its communal, cultural, and professional leadership, and the fostering of jewish connectedness globally, including the propagation of the hebrew language.

Religion
10
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
11
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
12
Jewish Community Relations Council

The jewish community relations council (jcrc) works within the jewish and broader communities in st. louis to enhance cooperation with other religious, racial, ethnic and civic groups; foster a just, democratic and pluralistic society; and…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minneapolis Jewish Federation; the most unlike its peers is Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
27/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $2,607,993 · OtherMINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA AND THE DAKOTAS: $1,709,005 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA …THE TALMUD TORAH OF ST PAUL: $974,003 · OtherTHE TALMUD TORAH OF ST PAULMINNESOTA HILLEL: $859,262 · OtherMINNESOTA HILLELCHABAD ACADEMY INC: $395,406 · OtherMOUNT ZION HEBREW CONGREGATION: $313,362 · Other+16 more: $743,091 · Other+16 moreMINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,605,199 · Human ServicesMINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER FO…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ST PAUL: $2,290,932 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ST PAULSHOLOM FOUNDATION: $745,227 · Human ServicesSHOLOM FOUNDATION+4 more: $43,948 · Human ServicesTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $3,432,165 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS…+3 more: $147,939 · PhilanthropySix Points Theater: $176,200 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA: $13,000 · Arts & CultureOLD GLOBE THEATRE: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHERZL CAMP ASSOCIATION INC: $187,300 · Recreation & SportsFRED WELLS TENNIS AND EDUCATION CENTER INC: $20,800 · Recreation & SportsNEW ISRAEL FUND: $75,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $45,000 · InternationalHIAS INC: $40,500 · InternationalNEGOTIATION STRATEGIES INSTITUTE: $20,000 · InternationalJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $15,000 · InternationalT'RUAH: $10,000 · InternationalHERZL CAMP FOUNDATION: $128,319 · ReligionJEWFOLK MEDIA INC: $17,500 · ReligionMAAYANOT COMMUNITY MIKVEH OF MINNESOTA: $15,000 · Religion
Other$7,602,122Human Services$5,685,306Philanthropy$3,580,104Arts & Culture$209,200Recreation & Sports$208,100International$205,500Religion$160,819

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $3,432,165 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $2,607,993 over 5y, 11% of budgetMINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,605,199 over 5y, 14% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ST PAUL: $2,290,932 over 9y, 14% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA AND THE DAKOTAS: $1,709,005 over 9y, 10% of budgetTHE TALMUD TORAH OF ST PAUL: $974,003 over 9y, 30% of budgetMINNESOTA HILLEL: $859,262 over 9y, 14% of budgetSHOLOM FOUNDATION: $745,227 over 8y, 5.5% of budgetHERZL CAMP ASSOCIATION INC: $187,300 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetSix Points Theater: $176,200 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetHERZL CAMP FOUNDATION: $128,319 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetHAROLD AND MICKEY SMITH JEWISH ACADEMY: $90,514 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $53,797 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $49,142 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHIAS INC: $40,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLAKE SCHOOL: $36,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE UPPER MIDWEST: $34,120 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetBEND THE ARC JEWISH ACTION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $21,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRED WELLS TENNIS AND EDUCATION CENTER INC: $20,800 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNEGOTIATION STRATEGIES INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetJEWFOLK MEDIA INC: $17,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY SOCIETY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetT'RUAH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOLD GLOBE THEATRE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $7,048 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD: $5,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Minneapolis Jewish Fe…The Minneapolis Found…Saint Paul & Minnesot…Mike & Linda Fiterman…Jewish Community Rela…American Endowment Fo…Chubb Charitable Foun…Jewish Communal FundJpmorgan Chase Founda…Vanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…
Minneapolis Jewish FederationMN24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Minneapolis Jewish Federation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Mike & Linda Fiterman Family Foundation · Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas · American Endowment Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The United Jewish Fund and Council St Paul Jewish Federation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The United Jewish Fund and Council St Paul Jewish Federation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on United Jewish Fund and Council St Paul Jewish Federation’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home