· Public charity
The United Jewish Fund and Council St Paul Jewish Federation
To unite, sustain, and enhance the st.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of THE UNITED JEWISH FUND AND COUNCIL ST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 17 grants below total $1,717,299 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,857,998 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $140,699 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $160k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $838k
- $250k+2 grants · $705k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER | $359,548 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL | $345,832 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ST PAUL | $204,466 |
| JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA | $159,698 |
| TEMPLE OF AARON | $153,966 |
| SHOLOM FOUNDATION | $136,589 |
| MOUNT ZION TEMPLE | $100,456 |
| HILLEL FOUNDATION | $83,120 |
| HEILICHER MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH DAY SCHOOL | $45,514 |
| BETH JACOB CONGREGATION | $30,152 |
| MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION | $27,927 |
| SIX POINTS THEATER | $19,950 |
| MAAYANOT COMMUNITY MIKVEH OF MINNESOTA | $15,000 |
| TALMUD TORAH | $11,791 |
| HERZL CAMP FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 16% of The United Jewish Fund and Council St Paul Jewish Federation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JCJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA AND THE DAKOTAS9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +307%
- MHMINNESOTA HILLEL9× · 2017–2025 · $859k · revenue +95%
- SFSHOLOM FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2025 · $745k · revenue +86%
Funded once
- TBTEMPLE BETH ELone grant, 2020 · $43k
- BTBEND THE ARC JEWISH ACTION INCone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -72%
- NSNEGOTIATION STRATEGIES INSTITUTEone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.
Our mission has always been to enhance jewish literacy through the publication of great books.
Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…
The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…
The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…
To enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.
To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…
To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.
Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…
As the central community relations agency of the organized jewish community in our nation's capital, the jcrc of greater washington endeavors to foster a society based on freedom, justice and democratic pluralism for it is such a society…
To conduct educational activities and to provide scholarly perspectives on foreign and domestic policies that impact the jewish community in the united states and the broader american public.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minneapolis Jewish Federation and the most unlike its peers is Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ST PAUL ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA AND THE DAKOTAS ↗
- Who funds THE TALMUD TORAH OF ST PAUL ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA HILLEL ↗
- Who funds SHOLOM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HERZL CAMP ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Six Points Theater ↗
- Who funds HERZL CAMP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAROLD AND MICKEY SMITH JEWISH ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
- Who funds MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds HIAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE BLAKE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE UPPER MIDWEST ↗
- Who funds BEND THE ARC JEWISH ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds FRED WELLS TENNIS AND EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEGOTIATION STRATEGIES INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds JEWFOLK MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds MAAYANOT COMMUNITY MIKVEH OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE ↗
- Who funds OLD GLOBE THEATRE ↗
- Who funds T'RUAH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Minneapolis Jewish Federation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Mike & Linda Fiterman Family Foundation · Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas · American Endowment Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The United Jewish Fund and Council St Paul Jewish Federation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.