· Public charity
The Thunderbirds
The purpose of THE THUNDERBIRDS shall be to publicize the city of phoenix, arizona, and the phoenix metropolitan area, by sponsoring athletic events and by providing financial assistance to amateur athletes and youth-oriented charities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 57 grants below total $12,551,854 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $12,894,047 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $342,193 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $123k
- $10k–50k30 grants · $591k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $687k
- $250k+4 grants · $11M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THUNDERBIRDS CHARITIES | $10,026,308 |
| THUNDERBIRDS FOUNDATION | $497,000 |
| CHANGE THE COURSE BEF | $323,334 |
| FIRST TEE OF PHOENIX (THE) | $304,500 |
| JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION OF ARIZONA | $207,500 |
| ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $160,000 |
| PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC | $100,000 |
| PHOENIX PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION | $92,394 |
| AMERICAN JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION | $70,000 |
| WASTE NOT AZ | $56,666 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VALLEY | $41,472 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF ARIZONA | $37,030 |
| WEST VALLEY MAVERICKS FOUNDATION | $33,000 |
| USO ARIZONA | $28,500 |
| MVP FOUNDATION THE | $28,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $776k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
67 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $220k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHUNDERBIRDS CHARITIES9× · 2017–2025 · $64M · revenue +52% · 88% of their budget
- TFTHUNDERBIRD FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $3.8M · revenue +66% · 100% of their budget
- AGARIZONA GOLF AND LIFE SKILLS INC DBA FIRST TEE - PHOENIX9× · 2017–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +35% · 34% of their budget
Funded once
- WEWM EMERGENCY EMPLOYEE SUPPORT FUNDone grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue -2%
- NFNABI FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $55k · revenue +31%
- COCITY OF PHOENIXone grant, 2020 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.
Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.
To encourage, assist, promote private philanthropy to increase the awareness, appreciation, effectiveness of private philanthropy by providing information, networking opportunities, technical assistance, related services to private…
Azaap is committed to improving the health of arizona children and supporting the pediatric professionals who care for them.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
Greater phoenix chamber of commerce (the chamber) catalyzes regional prosperity with forward-thinking public policy, intentional economic growth, and diverse, prepared talent.
Science foundation arizona's mission is to diversify arizona's economy by investing in scientific and engineering research linked to industry needs and investing in education to create a work force with 21st centrury skills.
Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…
To assist member firms in achieving higher professional, ethical business and economic standards, enabling member firms to provide quality consulting and engineering services for their clients and the public.
To connect, support and inform efforts to improve the health of individuals and communities in arizona.
To improve the greater phoenix area and the state of arizona by bringing together talent, resources and leadership to create action on priority issues.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is ABILITY360 Inc and the most unlike its peers is Xander Schauffele Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
139 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 139 of the 161 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THUNDERBIRDS CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds THUNDERBIRD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SUN ANGEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA GOLF AND LIFE SKILLS INC DBA FIRST TEE - PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION OF ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds BONNEVILLE ENVIRONMENTAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds American Junior Golf Association Inc ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds Waste Not Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN PHOENIX INC ↗
- Who funds Banner Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds WEST VALLEY MAVERICKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA RECYCLING COALITION DBA CIRCULAR ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds OPERATION SHOWER ↗
- Who funds SOCCER VILLAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Valley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association ↗
- Who funds Human Services Campus Inc ↗
- Who funds RECREATION AND ATHLETICS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX SUNS CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Solid Waste Association of North America ↗
- Who funds PGA TOUR WIVES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS FOUNDATIONINC ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MVP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WM EMERGENCY EMPLOYEE SUPPORT FUND ↗
- Who funds PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FIGHTER COUNTRY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital ↗
- Who funds EXECUTIVE COUNCIL CHARITIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Pga Tour Inc · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · BHHS Legacy Foundation · Fiesta Events Inc · Phoenix Suns Charities Inc · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Arizona Diamondbacks Foundationinc · American Express Foundation · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Thunderbirds funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bonneville Environmental Foundation — 100% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Jackson Health Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.