Skip to content

Arizona · Nonprofit

AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD

AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD (Arizona) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,992,281 to it, the largest being THE SATTERBERG FOUNDATION INC ($942,500). 17 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$2.3M
Funders on record
25
Grants received
$3.0M
Net assets
$822k
17/25 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 22%
01What it does

What Az Impact for Good does

Mission

Az Impact for Good unites the nonprofit and philanthropic sectors to transform arizona through educaiton, advocacy, and innovation.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. In 2024, the organization served its more than 1000 nonprofit and grantmaking members with educational programs, networking, and critical resources. Arizona gives day raised more than 5.3 million for more than 1,000 participating nonprofits. More than 600 nonprofit and grantmaking professionals attended our statewide annual conference. We continue to advocate for nonprofit and grantmaking organizations by sharing information andfollowing key legislative and federal issues.

    $355,835 earned by the program
  2. Total program expenses per audited financial statements

    $1,608,361 spent
    100% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,608,361.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.0M) Expenses 100 ($1.0M) Net assets -67 ($-31190)2018 Revenue 107 ($1.1M) Expenses 100 ($1.0M) Net assets 100 ($47k)2019 Revenue 126 ($1.3M) Expenses 113 ($1.2M) Net assets 394 ($184k)2020 Revenue 247 ($2.6M) Expenses 163 ($1.7M) Net assets 2270 ($1.1M)2021 Revenue 173 ($1.8M) Expenses 155 ($1.6M) Net assets 2672 ($1.3M)2022 Revenue 236 ($2.5M) Expenses 209 ($2.2M) Net assets 3269 ($1.5M)2023 Revenue 161 ($1.7M) Expenses 229 ($2.4M) Net assets 1753 ($821k)2024 Revenue 220 ($2.3M) Expenses 220 ($2.3M) Net assets 1755 ($822k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (220)Expenses (220)Net assets (1755)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $531k to $1.6M (+208%).

$235k
$382k
$531k
$1.6M
$1.7M
$2.4M
$1.6M
$1.3M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 23% · 2018 28% · 2019 31% · 2020 56% · 2021 37% · 2022 40% · 2023 26% · 2024 61%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

82% of AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (61% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,434 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$353
’17
$78k
’18
$138k
’19
$878k
’20
$188k
’21
$280k
’22
−$710k
’23
$1k
’24
4.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Kristen Wilson

CEO

Board chair

Jeri Royce

Board chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2021 and FY2022 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1313151718242018
Joined·+5+4+4+3+8+1+0
No longer listed·5222252
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 12 funders, grant income rose $167k → $289k.

3 of 25 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 23% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $818k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Arizona Grantmakers Forum). These are real filings, and they are not money AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD raised.

From the IRS filings of AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 31% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

58% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD.

31%
largest funder
66%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 78% · 2018 92% · 2019 75% · 2020 61% · 2021 31% · 2022 66% · 2023 32% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

46% of AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 68% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

55% of AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD's grant income comes from Arizona funders.

WA
MA
OH
DE
AZ
NC
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Arizona out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $698k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD has grown faster than half of the 4,203 community improvement nonprofits its size.

Operating margin0% · below the median
Months of reserve4.3mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)12% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,203 community improvement nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Arizona

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

70% of spending goes to programs.

Program 70%Management 19%Fundraising 12%

Governance

17
board members
106%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

92%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

AZ

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD?
AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD (Arizona) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,992,281 to it, the largest being THE SATTERBERG FOUNDATION INC ($942,500). 17 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD have?
IRS filings report 25 organizations giving $2,992,281 in grants to AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD, 17 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD?
THE SATTERBERG FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $942,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Arizona. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Az Impact for Good →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 25 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing