Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sylvan C Coleman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$284k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$521kHuman Services$258kFood & Nutrition$120kCivil Rights$114kArts & Culture$82kInternational$75kEmployment$54kEducation$51kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $225k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Womens Cancer Resource Center$30,000
Middlebury College$25,000
Hartford Hospital Foundation$20,000
George Mark Children's House$20,000
Planned Parenthood$15,000
Connecticut Foodshare$15,000
Commonwealth$15,000
Connecticut Childrens Medical Cente$15,000
Center for Reproductive Rights$10,000
The Town That Cares$10,000
James Beard Foundation$10,000
Gifts of Love$10,000
Hands On Hartford$10,000
Renbrook School$10,000
Charlotte Maxwell Clinic$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $193k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%My New Red Shoes: $3k → 7%Gifts of Love: $10k → 11%ALIVE: $10k → 9%My New Red Shoes: $2k → 7%Alameda Point Collaborative: $9k → 10%Gifts of Love: $10k → 11%ALIVE: $10k → 9%My New Red Shoes: $2k → 7%Alameda Point Collaborative: $9k → 10%Gifts of Love: $5k → 11%ALIVE: $9k → 9%My New Red Shoes: $2k → 7%Alameda Point Collaborative: $8k → 10%Gifts of Love: $5k → 11%ALIVE: $7k → 9%Alameda Point Collaborative: $8k → 10%Gifts of Love: $3k → 11%ALIVE: $6k → 9%Commonwealth: $15k → 8%Commonwealth: $10k → 8%Commonwealth: $10k → 8%Commonwealth: $10k → 8%Commonweal: $5k → 8%Commonwealth: $5k → 8%Hands On Hartford: $10k → 11%Hands On Hartford: $5k → 11%Hands On Hartford: $3k → 11%Hands On Hartford: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WI
NY
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 49 repeat orgs$127k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
8

Total granted

$1.2M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+13%

Still filing today

76%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthInternationalFood & NutritionArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    Womens Cancer Resource Center
    3× · 2019–2024 · $80k · revenue +23%
  • THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue +53%
  • COMMONWEAL
    6× · 2019–2024 · $55k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • CA
    CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +13%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • UN
    UCONN Neag School of Education
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
2
The Conversationalist
—
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Project Open Hand

Project Open Hand's mission is to improve health outcomes and quality of life by providing nutritious meals to the sick and vulnerable, caring for and educating our community.

Food & Nutrition
5
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
6
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
7
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
8
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
9
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
10
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
11
Women in Global Health Inc

Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.

Public Benefit
12
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Fund for Women Inc; the most unlike its peers is The National Museum of Women in the Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/48
Grantees still filing
35/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Planned Parenthood: $115,000 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodWomens Cancer Resource Center: $80,000 · OtherWomens Cancer Resource CenterACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $41,000 · OtherJewish Family and Childrens Service: $40,000 · OtherCharlotte Maxwell Clinic: $39,000 · OtherBREAST CANCER ACTION: $34,000 · OtherHartford Hospital Foundation: $30,000 · OtherREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $28,000 · OtherHOUSE OF RUTH: $33,000 · OtherFORGE CITY WORKS INC: $30,000 · Other+33 more: $337,500 · Other+33 moreCOMMONWEAL: $55,000 · Human ServicesCOMMONWEALALIVE Inc: $42,000 · Human ServicesALIVE IncALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE: $34,000 · Human ServicesALAMEDA POINT C…GIFTS OF LOVE INC: $32,500 · Human ServicesGIFTS OF LOVE I…HANDS ON HARTFORD INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesHANDS ON HARTFO…MBOLDEN CHANGE: $9,000 · Human ServicesPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $40,000 · HealthPLANNED P…CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $35,000 · HealthCONNECTIC…George Mark Childrens Fund: $20,000 · HealthGeorge Ma…National Women's Health Network: $11,000 · HealthNational …Alzheimers Services of the East Bay: $8,000 · HealthAlzheimer…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $34,000 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $10,000 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $9,000 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $6,000 · InternationalTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $60,000 · Civil RightsTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $15,000 · Civil RightsDANCE PLACE: $33,000 · Arts & CultureWADSWORTH ATHENEUM MUSEUM OF ART: $24,000 · Arts & CultureNEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureMEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $37,000 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $4,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$807,500Human Services$192,500Health$114,000International$84,000Civil Rights$75,000Arts & Culture$62,000Food & Nutrition$51,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWomens Cancer Resource Center: $80,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMONWEAL: $55,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetALIVE Inc: $42,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $41,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCharlotte Maxwell Clinic: $39,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $37,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE: $34,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $34,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBREAST CANCER ACTION: $34,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH: $33,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDANCE PLACE: $33,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetGIFTS OF LOVE INC: $32,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetFORGE CITY WORKS INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $28,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $24,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGuttmacher Institute Inc: $24,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWADSWORTH ATHENEUM MUSEUM OF ART: $24,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHANDS ON HARTFORD INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGeorge Mark Childrens Fund: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetA SAFE PLACE: $15,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD RUNNERS: $14,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER COALITION: $11,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetNational Women's Health Network: $11,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRENBROOK SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHRYSALIS CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHALLECK CREEK RANCH: $10,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetThe Cobb School Montessori Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMBOLDEN CHANGE: $9,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAlzheimers Services of the East Bay: $8,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL DANCE EDUCATION ORGANIZATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEAD ROYCE SCHOOL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCity Slicker Farms: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Womens Cancer Resource Center ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMONWEAL ↗
  • Who funds ALIVE Inc ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Charlotte Maxwell Clinic ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAST CANCER ACTION ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH ↗
  • Who funds DANCE PLACE ↗
  • Who funds GIFTS OF LOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds FORGE CITY WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
  • Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Guttmacher Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds WADSWORTH ATHENEUM MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds HANDS ON HARTFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds George Mark Childrens Fund ↗
  • Who funds THE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds A SAFE PLACE ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD RUNNERS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BREAST CANCER COALITION ↗
  • Who funds National Women's Health Network ↗
  • Who funds RENBROOK SCHOOL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Clarence B Coleman and Joan F Coleman Charitable FoundationCA43.3× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Clarence B Coleman and Joan F Coleman Charitable Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · McNabb Foundation · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The California Wellness Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Auerbach Schiro Foundation · The William and Alice Mortensen Foundation · Sbm Charitable Foundation Inc · The William G Irwin Charity Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sylvan C Coleman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sylvan C Coleman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Chrysalis Center Inc: 93% of income from government
  • Hands On Hartford Inc: 20% of income from government
  • New Britain Museum of American Art Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art: 5% of income from government
  • Connecticut Children's Medical Center: 5% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
  • Forge City Works Inc: 1% of income from government
  • National Dance Education Organization: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Sylvan C Coleman Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Sylvan C Coleman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sylvan C Coleman’s filings →

More from the funding graph