Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Robert and Dawn Zuilhof Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$117k
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$401kHuman Services$187kFood & Nutrition$150kHealth$97kReligion$94kEducation$57kHousing & Shelter$24kPhilanthropy$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k29 grants · $97k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$4,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AZLE CARING CENTER$10,000
ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES$10,000
ZACHARY AND ELIZABETH M FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIME$7,000
BELOVED ASHEVILLE$6,000
FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF H B$6,000
FIRST METHODIST CHURCH OF AZLE$6,000
THE BROOKWOOD COMMUNITY INC$5,000
BRACKENS KITCHEN INC$5,000
HIGH DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
ACTION AGAINST HUNGER USA$5,000
SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY$5,000
AZLE CARING CENTER$5,000
ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES$5,000
AZLE CARING CENTER$5,000
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $212k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WELL IN THE DESERT: $2k → 11%SAFE HARBOR COUNSELING CENTER: $3k → 8%FEED SPOKANE: $3k → 12%SAFE HARBOR COUNSELING CENTER: $3k → 8%FEED SPOKANE: $2k → 12%SAFE HARBOR COUNSELING CENTER: $3k → 8%SAFE HARBOR COUNSELING CENTER: $3k → 8%SAFE HARBOR COUNSELING CENTER: $3k → 8%SAFE HARBOR COUNSELING CENTER: $3k → 8%AZLE CARING CENTER: $25k → 8%AZLE CARING CENTER: $10k → 8%GOOD N E W S LIVING AT HOME-BLOCK NURSE PROGRAM: $8k → 8%FORT WORTH HOPE CENTER: $2k → 11%FORT WORTH HOPE CENTER: $1k → 11%AZLE CARING CENTER: $5k → 8%AZLE CARING CENTER: $5k → 8%AZLE CARING CENTER: $5k → 8%AZLE CARING CENTER: $5k → 8%AZLE CARING CENTER: $5k → 8%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN FORT WORTH: $10k → 11%AZLE CARING CENTER: $5k → 8%AZLE CARING CENTER: $5k → 8%AZLE CARING CENTER: $5k → 8%AZLE CARING CENTER: $5k → 8%AZLE CARING CENTER: $5k → 8%AZLE CARING CENTER: $5k → 8%AZLE CARING CENTER: $5k → 8%AZLE CARING CENTER: $5k → 8%AZLE CARING CENTER: $5k → 8%AZLE CARING CENTER: $5k → 8%GOOD N E W S LIVING AT HOME-BLOCK NURSE PROGRAM: $3k → 8%GOOD N E W S LIVING AT HOME-BLOCK NURSE PROGRAM: $3k → 8%GOOD N E W S LIVING AT HOME-BLOCK NURSE PROGRAM: $3k → 8%GOOD N E W S LIVING AT HOME-BLOCK NURSE PROGRAM: $3k → 8%GOOD N E W S LIVING AT HOME-BLOCK NURSE PROGRAM: $3k → 8%GOOD N E W S LIVING AT HOME-BLOCK NURSE PROGRAM: $3k → 8%AZLE CARING CENTER: $2k → 8%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $8k → 11%SAFE HARBOR COUNSELING CENTER: $3k → 8%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $5k → 11%SAFE HARBOR COUNSELING CENTER: $3k → 8%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $5k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $5k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $5k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $5k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $3k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
IN
CT
CA
MD
AR
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$924k · 29 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
17

Total granted

$924k
$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+13%

Still filing today

79%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationInternationalHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    ONE COLLECTIVE
    6× · 2017–2023 · $340k · revenue +29%
  • AC
    AZLE CARING CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $112k · revenue +184%
  • AC
    ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $73k · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • A
    ALIGHT
    one grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue +22%
  • MS
    Mike Steele Foundation for Communities in Schoolsgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +43%
  • YO
    YMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
3
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
4
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
5
Impact Community Action Partnership Inc

Reducing the barriers and burdens that families in poverty experience by increasing access to essential needs.

—
6
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
7
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
8
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
9
Feeding Avery Families Inc

Provide food at no cost to hungry people in need in avery county, nc and improve their health where possible

Food & Nutrition
10
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
11
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
12
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa; the most unlike its peers is Streams in the Desert Foundation Inc Dba High Desert Community Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
28/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ONE COLLECTIVE: $340,000 · InternationalONE COLLECTIVEINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS: $13,500 · International+5 more: $32,500 · International+5 moreACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $72,500 · OtherACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVIC…HIGH DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherHIGH DESERT COMMUNITY FOUND…Brackens Kitchen Inc: $25,000 · OtherBrackens Kitchen IncBEAUTIFUL FEET CHURCH S B C INC: $21,000 · OtherBEAUTIFUL FEET CHURCH S B C…FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF H B: $18,000 · OtherFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF H…FIRST METHODIST CHURCH OF AZLE: $12,000 · OtherMOSES HOUSE MINISTRIES: $13,000 · Other+13 more: $52,100 · Other+13 moreAZLE CARING CENTER: $111,880 · Human ServicesAZLE CARING CENTERSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $37,500 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT CO…GOOD NEWS LIVING AT HOME- BLOCK NURSE PROGRAM: $22,500 · Human ServicesGOOD NEWS LIVING AT HOM…SAFE HARBOR COUNSELING CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HARBOR COUNSELING …YMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth: $10,000 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE HOMELESS: $8,000 · Human Services+3 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesThe Brookwood Community Inc: $50,000 · EducationThe Brookwo…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC: $25,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES…Mike Steele Foundation for Communities in Schools: $10,000 · EducationMike Steele…UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …MY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Education+2 more: $3,000 · EducationAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $20,500 · HealthTHE ZACHARY & ELIZABETH M FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIMER'S RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $18,000 · HealthTexas Health Resources Foundation: $2,500 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyStreams in the Desert Foundation Inc DBA High Desert Community Foundation Inc: $5,000 · PhilanthropySERVOLUTION NETWORK INC: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $6,000 · Housing & Shelter
International$386,000Other$248,600Human Services$219,880Education$101,500Health$41,500Philanthropy$30,000Housing & Shelter$13,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetONE COLLECTIVE: $340,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetAZLE CARING CENTER: $111,880 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $72,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Brookwood Community Inc: $50,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $37,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBrackens Kitchen Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD NEWS LIVING AT HOME- BLOCK NURSE PROGRAM: $22,500 over 7y, 6.7% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $20,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE HARBOR COUNSELING CENTER INC: $20,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetTHE ZACHARY & ELIZABETH M FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIMER'S RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS: $13,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOSES HOUSE MINISTRIES: $13,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetALIGHT: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMike Steele Foundation for Communities in Schools: $10,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE HOMELESS: $8,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSERVOLUTION NETWORK INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetKids Alive International Inc: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFeed Spokane: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetStreams in the Desert Foundation Inc DBA High Desert Community Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHEALING THE CHILDREN NORTHEAST INC: $3,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WORTH HOPE CENTER THE HOPE CENTER: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCDOWELL LFAC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WELL IN THE DESERT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetROCKETSHIP EDUCATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL STAR EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North Texas (TaxTX20.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · United Way of Tarrant County · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robert and Dawn Zuilhof Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robert and Dawn Zuilhof Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America: 22% of income from government
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Robert and Dawn Zuilhof Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Robert and Dawn Zuilhof Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert and Dawn Zuilhof Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph