· Private foundation
The Robert and Dawn Zuilhof Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k29 grants · $97k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES | $10,000 |
| AZLE CARING CENTER | $10,000 |
| ZACHARY AND ELIZABETH M FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIME | $7,000 |
| FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF H B | $6,000 |
| BELOVED ASHEVILLE | $6,000 |
| FIRST METHODIST CHURCH OF AZLE | $6,000 |
| AZLE CARING CENTER | $5,000 |
| THE BROOKWOOD COMMUNITY INC | $5,000 |
| BRACKENS KITCHEN INC | $5,000 |
| AZLE CARING CENTER | $5,000 |
| SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY | $5,000 |
| ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES | $5,000 |
| ACTION AGAINST HUNGER USA | $5,000 |
| HIGH DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE HOMELESS | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $212k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OCONE COLLECTIVE6× · 2017–2023 · $340k · revenue +29%
- ACAZLE CARING CENTER8× · 2017–2024 · $112k · revenue +184%
- ACACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES8× · 2017–2024 · $73k · revenue +150%
Funded once
- AALIGHTone grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue +22%
- VFVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -61%
- YOYMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worthone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.
Reducing the barriers and burdens that families in poverty experience by increasing access to essential needs.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…
Provide food at no cost to hungry people in need in avery county, nc and improve their health where possible
Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.
To eliminate hunger in south dakota.
Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa and the most unlike its peers is Streams in the Desert Foundation Inc Dba High Desert Community Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ONE COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds AZLE CARING CENTER ↗
- Who funds ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds The Brookwood Community Inc ↗
- Who funds SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Brackens Kitchen Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD NEWS LIVING AT HOME- BLOCK NURSE PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
- Who funds SAFE HARBOR COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE ZACHARY & ELIZABETH M FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIMER'S RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS ↗
- Who funds MOSES HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ALIGHT ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth ↗
- Who funds Mike Steele Foundation for Communities in Schools ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds SERVOLUTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
- Who funds Kids Alive International Inc ↗
- Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Feed Spokane ↗
- Who funds Streams in the Desert Foundation Inc DBA High Desert Community Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HEALING THE CHILDREN NORTHEAST INC ↗
- Who funds MY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds FORT WORTH HOPE CENTER THE HOPE CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · United Way of Tarrant County · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Robert and Dawn Zuilhof Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Epilepsy Foundation of America — 22% of income from government
- Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Robert and Dawn Zuilhof Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Robert and Dawn Zuilhof Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.