Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ressler Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$211k
Granted FY2021
8
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

77% of The Ressler Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Brown University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 20 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year The Ressler Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $211k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

24
’17
12
’18
42
’19
13
’20
7
’21
27
’22
18
’23
20
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$39MHealth$2.5MCrime & Legal$611kHuman Services$557kCivil Rights$528kArts & Culture$497kPhilanthropy$395kInternational$273kOther$0
02FY2021 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIASPORA$150,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$25,000
SOUTHEAST VENTURA COUNTY YMCA$10,000
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MUSEUM MEMORIAL$10,000
JUDGES AND LAWYERS BREAST CANCER ALERT$5,000
LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART$5,000
MINORITY HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION$5,000
THE LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $325k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $45k → 14%SEVENTH GENERATION FUND: $25k → 18%GATEWAY TO CHANGE INC: $250 → 14%INDIASPORA: $150k → 10%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM: $5k → 9%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $20k → 14%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $20k → 14%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES: $20k → 14%JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 17%AL OTRO LADO: $5k → 14%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH: $20k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IN
CT
RI
CA
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14M · 39 repeat orgs$3.1M to everyone else

39 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2021, 36 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
60

Total granted

$14M
$1.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+39%

Still filing today

69%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $124k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHealthCrime & LegalArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +21%
  • PC
    PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $250k · revenue +57%
  • B
    BABY2BABY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $210k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • TM
    THE MELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2020 · $325k
  • MR
    MELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $322k · revenue +33%
  • HB
    HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $251k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
4
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
5
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
6
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
7
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
8
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
9
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
10
Human Rights Watch Inc

Human rights watch ("hrw") defends the rights of people worldwide. we scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. human rights watch is an independent,…

International
11
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
12
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Immigration Law Center and the most unlike its peers is We the Women. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsPregnancy Support ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Community FoundationsFood Banks and PantriesEnvironmental Conservation …Health Access Advocacy and …Jewish Community Organizati…Youth Development ServicesCommunity Arts CentersUnited Way AffiliatesPolicy Research and AdvocacyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%2%<5yr13%6%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr18%30%20–35yr14%25%35–55yr18%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%1%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr18%4%20–35yr14%3%35–55yr18%87%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/107
the rest of the field
10%
646/6,306

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

102 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 102 of the 137 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
100/102
Grantees still filing
72/102
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BROWN UNIVERSITY — $28,058,076 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNIVERSITY+1 more — $30,000 · Community ImprovementUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES FOUNDATION — $4,392,647 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS …COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL — $3,015,020 · OtherCOLUMBIA LAW SCHOOLUCLA — $817,500 · OtherUCLA+85 more — $3,794,044 · Other+85 moreHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL — $2,403,432 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $518,959 · Education+5 more — $48,600 · EducationMELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $674,579 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $261,666 · HealthNORTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC — $66,667 · Health+6 more — $48,227 · HealthPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION — $250,000 · PhilanthropyLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION — $225,000 · PhilanthropySTAND UP TO CANCER — $25,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $20,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $22,500 · PhilanthropyTHE BAIL PROJECT INC — $215,000 · Crime & LegalCasa Cornelia Legal Services — $125,000 · Crime & LegalImmigrant Defenders Law Center — $50,000 · Crime & LegalTHE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION — $30,000 · Crime & LegalLegal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles — $20,000 · Crime & Legal+4 more — $30,000 · Crime & LegalINDIASPORA — $150,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $45,000 · Human ServicesALEXANDRIA HOUSE — $40,000 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES — $20,000 · Human ServicesSAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC — $20,000 · Human Services+7 more — $28,250 · Human Services
Community Improvement$28,088,076Other$12,019,211Education$2,970,991Health$1,051,139Philanthropy$567,500Crime & Legal$470,000Human Services$353,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $28,058,076 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL — $2,403,432 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetMELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $674,579 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $518,959 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $321,724 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $261,666 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION — $225,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC — $215,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetBABY2BABY — $210,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR ART RESEARCH AND ALLIANCES INC — $200,000 over 4y, 77% of budgetINDIASPORA — $150,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCasa Cornelia Legal Services — $125,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetWe the Women — $120,410 over 2y, 41% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $120,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND — $110,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $106,666 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORTH RISES INC — $100,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetDREAMORG — $100,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC — $66,667 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $53,333 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetImmigrant Defenders Law Center — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $45,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAINFOREST FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTAND UP TO CANCER — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe End Fund Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINNOVATIONS FOR POVERTY ACTION A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HEIGHTS YOUTH INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH — $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAYVIEW FUTURES FKA CENTER FOR YOUTH WELLNESS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFeeding America — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundSilicon Valley Commun…Conrad N Hilton Found…The Goldman Sachs Cha…The California Wellne…Jewish Community Foun…Liberty Hill Foundati…Gs Donor Advised Phil…California Community …Weingart FoundationCalifornia Changelawy…The Karsh Family Foun…
Jewish Communal FundNY22.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The California Wellness Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Liberty Hill Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · California Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · California Changelawyers · The Karsh Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ressler Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ressler Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Ressler Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 137 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines