Skip to content
The Rauch Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Rauch Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15M
Granted FY2024still arriving
56
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$32MHealth$12MInternational$6.8MFood & Nutrition$5.5MPublic Safety & Disaster$3.6MArts & Culture$2.4MHousing & Shelter$2.2MHuman Services$1.7MOther$0
02FY2024 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $276k
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $2.3M
  • $250k+14 grants · $12M
$80,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$108M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE AMERICAN RED CROSS - INLAND EMPIRE BLOOD CLINIC$2,500,000
WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA$1,500,000
HELEN KELLER THROUGH GIVEWELL- VIT A SUPPLEMENTATION (MADAGASCAR PROJECT)$1,500,000
PROVIDENCE ST MARY MEDICAL CENTER$1,001,055
DIGNITY HEALTH - SBMC$1,000,000
CARTER CENTER - 20222023 TRACHOMA INTERVENTIONS IN SUDAN PROJECT$1,000,000
Individual grant recipient$880,000
GIVEWELL - THE CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE (CHAI)$800,000
Individual grant recipient$500,000
FEEDING AMERICA RIVERSIDE & SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES$500,000
CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & MEDICINE (CUSM)$270,400
ARROWHEAD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$250,000
GLOBALGIVING - 2024 HURRICANE BERYL RELIEF FUND$250,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$250,000
LA PHILHARMONIC ASSOCATION FBO YOLA$200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $5.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILD HELP INC: $25k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DEGIO: $10k → 11%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $1.6M → 14%WARRIORS FOR CHILDREN: $75k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $1.5M → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $850k → 14%WARRIORS FOR CHILDREN: $16k → 14%WARRIORS FOR CHILDREN: $15k → 14%WARRIORS FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 14%WARRIORS FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 14%SAY SAN DIEGO: $10k → 14%HOUSE OF RUTH: $85k → 14%HOUSE OF RUTH: $70k → 14%HOUSE OF RUTH: $30k → 14%HOUSE OF RUTH: $15k → 14%HOUSE OF RUTH: $15k → 14%HOUSE OF RUTH: $10k → 14%PILGRIM PLACE: $250k → 14%HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%PILGRIM PLACE: $25k → 14%HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION: $80k → 14%PILGRIM PLACE: $25k → 14%HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%PILGRIM PLACE: $25k → 14%SERVICE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIFE: $10k → 14%SERVICE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIFE: $10k → 14%SERVICE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIFE: $10k → 14%SERVICE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIFE: $10k → 14%SERVICE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIFE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NC
DC
HI
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$62M · 67 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

67 repeat relationships: 42 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

67
40

Total granted

$62M
$6.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+29%

Still filing today

49%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthInternationalEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2021 · $31M · revenue +51%
  • FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +4%
  • TC
    THE CARTER CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M · revenue +29%
  • GC
    GIVEWELLAKATHE CLEAR FUND- MALARIA CONSORTIUM
    one grant, 2022 · $750k
  • EA
    EVIDENCE ACTION - WATER CHLORINATION (INDIA PROJECT - VIA GIVEWELL)
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
2
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
3
Emanate Health

Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.

Health
4
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
5
Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

Health
6
Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

—
7
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
8
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
9
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
10
Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital

Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.

Health
11
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
12
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evidence Action; the most unlike its peers is Phillips Exeter Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/47
Grantees still filing
41/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUKE UNIVERSITY: $30,743,245 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY+4 more: $579,500 · EducationIndividual grant recipient: $3,700,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHELEN KELLER THROUGH GIVEWELL- VIT A SUPPLEMENTATION (MADAGASCAR PROJECT): $3,000,000 · OtherHELEN KELLER THROUGH GIVEWELL- VIT A SUPPL…THE AMERICAN RED CROSS - INLAND EMPIRE BLOOD CLINIC: $2,500,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN RED CROSS - INLAND EMPIRE BLO…PROVIDENCE ST MARY MEDICAL CENTER: $1,451,055 · OtherDIGNITY HEALTH - SBMC: $1,000,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES OPERA: $950,000 · Other+84 more: $15,309,473 · Other+84 moreFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $3,930,000 · Human ServicesHOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION: $580,000 · Human ServicesPILGRIM PLACE: $325,000 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF RUTH INC: $225,000 · Human Services+5 more: $216,000 · Human ServicesTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $2,785,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $725,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $215,000 · InternationalEVIDENCE ACTION: $215,000 · InternationalHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $200,000 · International+2 more: $25,000 · InternationalChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $1,402,519 · HealthSAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL: $1,000,000 · HealthPomona Valley Hospital Medical Center: $315,000 · HealthLIGHTHOUSE SOCIAL SERVICE CENTERS: $270,000 · HealthSan Antonio Hospital Foundation Inc: $183,500 · Health+2 more: $27,500 · HealthFEEDING AMERICA RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES: $1,453,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $27,500 · Food & NutritionA COMMUNITY OF FRIENDS: $500,000 · Housing & ShelterMERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS: $190,000 · Housing & Shelter
Education$31,322,745Other$27,910,528Human Services$5,276,000International$4,165,000Health$3,198,519Food & Nutrition$1,480,500Housing & Shelter$690,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $30,743,245 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $3,930,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $2,785,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES: $1,453,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $1,402,519 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARROWHEAD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $765,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $725,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION: $580,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetA COMMUNITY OF FRIENDS: $500,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION: $500,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetBRIGHT PROSPECT: $410,000 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetPILGRIM PLACE: $325,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPomona Valley Hospital Medical Center: $315,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE SOCIAL SERVICE CENTERS: $270,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetLMWS INC: $260,000 over 8y, 19% of budgetJAMBOREE HOUSING CORPORATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH INC: $225,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetFOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER INC: $216,000 over 8y, 7.7% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $215,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVIDENCE ACTION: $215,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS: $190,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSan Antonio Hospital Foundation Inc: $183,500 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $176,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTime For Change Foundation: $141,250 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWARRIOR FOR CHILDREN: $121,000 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST HARBOR PUBLIC LIBRARY: $88,500 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetSan Bernardino Symphony Orchestra: $75,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetSAHABA INITIATIVE INC: $65,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetSTREET SYMPHONY PROJECT INC: $60,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $54,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetService Center for Independent Life: $50,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetPROJECT BOON INC: $27,500 over 1y, 27% of budgetCHILDHELP INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Life You Can Save: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBE PERFECT FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC: $16,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFORWARD ADVANTAGE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetEMPOWERING LIVES INTERNATIONAL: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH SAN DIEGO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHope Matters International: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPOMONA VALLEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds ARROWHEAD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds A COMMUNITY OF FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT PROSPECT ↗
  • Who funds PILGRIM PLACE ↗
  • Who funds Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE SOCIAL SERVICE CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds LMWS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inland Empire Communi…Weingart FoundationKaiser Foundation Hos…Mufg Union Bank Found…California Community …Inland Empire United …The Annenberg Foundat…Ontario Community Fou…Union Pacific Foundat…Edwards Lifesciences …Orange County Communi…Price Foundation Inc
Inland Empire Community FoundationCA28.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · California Community Foundation · Inland Empire United Way · The Annenberg Foundation · Ontario Community Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · Price Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rauch Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rauch Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 122 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rauch Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home