· Community foundation
Park City Community Foundation
We bring together caring donors, expert nonprofits, and community leaders to contribute financial resources and innovative ideas to benefit all the people of park city - now and into the future.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 98 grants below total $5,021,408 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,009,037 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $987,629 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k15 grants · $102k
- $10k–50k57 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k20 grants · $2.0M
- $250k+6 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PC TOTS | $306,310 |
| GREEN MOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL INC | $300,000 |
| PROJECT CURE | $300,000 |
| PEACE HOUSE | $274,533 |
| REALIZE IMPACT | $250,000 |
| NEW YORK UNIVERSITY | $250,000 |
| HOLY CROSS MINISTRIES | $206,080 |
| PEOPLE'S HEALTH CLINIC | $203,190 |
| TELOS CLASSICAL FOUNDATION | $200,040 |
| CARINGBRIDGE | $150,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES | $130,000 |
| WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE | $125,000 |
| LATINO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES | $101,000 |
| CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY | $98,530 |
| RECYCLE UTAH | $93,610 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
100 repeat relationships — 73 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $728k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JFJewish Family Service8× · 2017–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +219% · 35% of their budget
- CCCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY7× · 2017–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +59%
- PCPARK CITY TOTS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +174%
Funded once
MAUI FOOD BANK INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +138%- CCCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INCone grant, 2022 · $100k
- FOFRIENDS OF CEDAR MESAgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +382%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…
Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.
The Utah Sports Commission Foundation is a charitable organization governed by an all-volunteer board of trustees consisting of statewide sports, business, and community leaders, and was created to foster national and international sports…
The utah sports commission is governed by an all-volunteer board of trustees consisting of statewide sports, business, and community leaders, and was created to foster national and international sports competitions to be held in the state…
Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…
Democracy Means Equality, Freedom & Justice: It means having a representative government. UDC is here to transform Utah politics and ensure that every voice counts.
The mission of the Utah Safety Council is to save lives by promoting safety and health through education, services, and products.
Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.
The Utah State Fair Corporation was established to preserve Utah's heritage, meet tomorrow's future today, and showcase agriculture and innovative technology.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Ability Center and the most unlike its peers is Onerefugee. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
148 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 148 of the 178 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Jewish Family Service ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY ↗
- Who funds PARK CITY TOTS INC ↗
- Who funds Holy Cross Ministries of Utah ↗
- Who funds Peace House Inc ↗
- Who funds BootUp PD Inc ↗
- Who funds People's Health Clicnic ↗
- Who funds YOUTH WINTER SPORTS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Park City Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds Summit Land Conservancy ↗
- Who funds Realize Impact ↗
- Who funds BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LATINO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT COUNTY CLUBHOUSE ↗
- Who funds Park City Summit County Arts Council ↗
- Who funds UTAH ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PARK CITY CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GREEN MOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECT SUMMIT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds TELOS CLASSICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Community Wireless of Park City ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAINLANDS COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSOCIAT ↗
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds SOS OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds EATS Park City ↗
- Who funds JOSEPH JAMES MORELLI LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Kimball Art Center ↗
- Who funds UTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Park City Performances ↗
- Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds The Summit County Recovery Foundation ↗
- Who funds PARK CITY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds LIVE LIKE SAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CaringBridge ↗
- Who funds THE HOPE ALLIANCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Ssir Cares Inc · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Sad Foundation Inc · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Promontory Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · Byrne Family Foundation Trust · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Park City Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.