Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mitchell J Blutt and Margo Krody Blutt Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$657k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$515k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$3.4MHealth$1.2MArts & Culture$514kRecreation & Sports$39kEnvironment$16kReligion$11kCommunity Improvement$8kFood & Nutrition$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
  • $250k+1 grant · $515k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEIL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE$515,000
TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$120,000
NEW YORK CITY BALLET$20,000
SOUTHAMPTON THEATER INC$2,000
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT: $300 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 11 repeat orgs$232k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
33

Total granted

$2.2M
$230k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+18%

Still filing today

55%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $354k · revenue +21%
  • BC
    BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $55k · revenue +40%
  • BI
    BALLETCOLLECTIVE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • WC
    WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $77k
  • WM
    WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +82%
  • NY
    NEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
3
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
4
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
5
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
8
Balletx

Balletx expands the vocabulary of contemporary ballet for all audiences through innovative performances, world premiere choreography, dance education, and community programs.

Arts & Culture
9
The Diller-Quaile School of Music Inc

For more than a century, diller-quaile has offered an environment where music can flourish in all its aspects, enriching the lives of students of all ages and cultural backgrounds. the belief that music is a fundamental part of human life…

Arts & Culture
10
Municipal Art Society of New York

The municipal art society of new york (mas) lifts up the voices of the people in the debates that shape new york's built environment and leads the way to a more livable city from sidewalk to skyline. mas envisions a future in which all new…

Arts & Culture
11
Move(Nyc) Foundation Inc

Move|nyc| is a civic arts and social justice organization committed to cultivating a more diverse and inclusive society through transforming the field of professional dance. more than an arts organization, move|nyc| is a movement for…

Public Benefit
12
Princeton Ballet Society

Princeton ballet society's mission is to nurture a lifelong love of dance and lift the collective spirit through excellent, relevant, and accessible artistic and educational programs, with a focus on classical ballet.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is School of American Ballet Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Commonwealth Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $3,505,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA+1 more: $55,000 · EducationWEIL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $1,637,275 · OtherWEIL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGEWEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $77,000 · Other+26 more: $211,454 · Other+26 moreNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $353,641 · Arts & CultureWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureBALLETCOLLECTIVE INC: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $17,000 · Arts & CultureGENE SPOTLIGHT INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyThe Scenic Hudson Land Trust Inc: $8,625 · EnvironmentPECONIC LAND TRUST INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentWORLD CONNECT INC: $7,500 · InternationalFOREIGN POLICY ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · InternationalUNITED HOSPITAL FUND OF NEW YORK: $1,500 · HealthANSWER ALS: $1,000 · HealthTHE ASSOCIATION FOR FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION: $500 · Health
Education$3,560,000Other$1,925,729Arts & Culture$435,641Philanthropy$10,250Environment$9,625International$8,500Health$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $3,505,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $353,641 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDJERASSI RESIDENT ARTISTS PROGRAM: $32,263 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetBALLETCOLLECTIVE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC: $13,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGENE SPOTLIGHT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetThe Scenic Hudson Land Trust Inc: $8,625 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL OF AMERICAN BALLET INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CONNECT INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCreative Arts Workshops for Kids Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED HOSPITAL FUND OF NEW YORK: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOREIGN POLICY ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPECONIC LAND TRUST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANSWER ALS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMENTOR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NEW YORK CITY AND WESTCHERSTER COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Partisan Education Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION FOR FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND STREET SETTLEMENT INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Commonwealth Fund: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY16.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mitchell J Blutt and Margo Krody Blutt Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mitchell J Blutt and Margo Krody Blutt Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Berklee College of Music Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mitchell J Blutt and Margo Krody Blutt Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph