Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Maxwellhanrahan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.6M
Granted FY2022
164
Grants FY2022
25
States reached
$697k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Science & Tech$2.1MArts & Culture$2.1MEnvironment$1.6MEducation$1.4MPhilanthropy$320kAnimals$221kHuman Services$45kCommunity Improvement$35kOther$0
02FY2022 · 164 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k48 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k97 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.7M
$10,000
Median grant
25
States reached
$561M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED STATES ARTISTS INC$696,900
RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN$500,000
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY$300,000
SF BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM$250,000
RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN$200,000
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS$200,000
PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST$150,000
PHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION$130,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
SONOMA LAND TRUST$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY - CALIFORNIA CHAPTER$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HAIGHT ASHBURY FOOD PROGRAM: $2k → 10%COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 14%HEART OF THE REDWOODS COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $120 → 18%HEART OF THE REDWOODS COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $120 → 18%SIENA HOUSE MATERNITY HOME OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $360 → 13%SIENA HOUSE MATERNITY HOME OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $200 → 13%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $15k → 10%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NJ
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.9M · 63 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

63 repeat relationships — 63 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 75 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

63
26

Total granted

$4.9M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+68%

Still filing today

98%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN
    2× · 2019–2022 · $750k · revenue +8%
  • NG
    NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $320k · revenue +197%
  • US
    UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $280k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
2
California Institute for Biodiversity

Create and publish educational materials, conduct professional development, promote awareness, and sponsor research on the spectacular biological diversity of the State of CA.

Education
3
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
4
California Wildlife Foundation

The foundation works with diverse groups representing many interests to acquire and restore critical wildlife habitat and protecting species

Animals
5
California Institute of Environmental Studies

The institute is dedicated to scientific research, the results of which are used to promote public awareness and education in the areas of conservation biology and ecology,including the wise use of natural resources.

Animals
6
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
7
California Ocean Science Trust

California ocean science trust (ost) is a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating progress towards a healthy and productive ocean future for california. created by state legislation, ost bridges the gap between cutting-edge…

Environment
8
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
9
San Diego Society of Natural History

Conserving nature through science and discovery.

Arts & Culture
10
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
11
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
12
San Francisco Zoological Society

To connect all people with wildlife, inspire caring for nature, and advance conservation action.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees and the most unlike its peers is Tenderloin Tessie Holiday Dinners. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts CentersCommunity FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Affordable Housing Developm…Ymca Youth DevelopmentYouth Sports ProgramsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Women & Girls Leadership De…Independent K-12 SchoolsImmigrant Worker SupportJewish Community Organizati…Local Food System Organizat…Community Food PantriesPolicy Research and AdvocacyOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Food Banks and PantriesYouth Development CentersVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Animal Rescue and ShelterHealth Access Advocacy and …Public Library OperationsChristian Missionary Organi…Pregnancy Support ServicesLocal History MuseumsEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%1%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr11%26%35–55yr13%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr17%33%20–35yr11%20%35–55yr13%43%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/142
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,836

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

137 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 137 of the 168 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
29
Early backer (in before they grew)
137/137
Grantees still filing
107/137
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SF BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM — $250,000 · OtherSF BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT S…THE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $115,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherThe University of Texas at Austin Jackson School — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — $95,000 · Other+46 more — $422,865 · Other+46 moreUnited States Artists Inc — $1,361,500 · Arts & CultureUnited States Artists IncCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS — $200,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE AR…CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $132,500 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES+30 more — $417,530 · Arts & Culture+30 moreRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN — $750,000 · EducationRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DE…NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY — $320,000 · EducationNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIE…UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $280,000 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIONWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · EducationWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY+21 more — $308,625 · Education+21 morePENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST — $220,000 · EnvironmentPENINSULA OPEN SP…SAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM — $205,000 · EnvironmentSAN FRANCISCO BOT…THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $130,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUB…SONOMA LAND TRUST — $130,000 · EnvironmentSONOMA LAND TRUSTTRUST FOR HIDDEN VILLA — $51,500 · EnvironmentTHE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE — $50,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL GRANTMAKERS ASSOCIATION — $44,000 · Environment+26 more — $380,995 · Environment+26 morePHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION — $285,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $35,000 · PhilanthropyCRAFT EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION — $90,000 · AnimalsPOINT REYES BIRD OBSERVATORY — $90,000 · AnimalsPrimates Peru — $10,000 · Animals+3 more — $780 · AnimalsYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $30,000 · Human ServicesHaight Ashbury Food Program — $1,500 · Human Services+3 more — $1,300 · Human Services
Other$2,282,865Arts & Culture$2,111,530Education$1,758,625Environment$1,211,495Philanthropy$340,000Animals$190,780Human Services$32,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUnited States Artists Inc — $1,361,500 over 2y, 10% of budgetRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN — $750,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY — $320,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION — $285,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $280,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST — $220,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM — $205,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS — $200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $132,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $130,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSONOMA LAND TRUST — $130,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $115,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT REYES BIRD OBSERVATORY — $90,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPOLYNESIAN VOYAGING SOCIETY — $60,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTRUST FOR HIDDEN VILLA — $51,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE — $50,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL GRANTMAKERS ASSOCIATION — $44,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION — $32,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMonterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO SANTA ANA BOTANIC GARDEN — $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPenland School Of Craft — $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST — $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSANTA BARBARA BOTANIC GARDEN — $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPACIFIC HORTICULTURE SOCIETY — $25,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetCLARITY EDUCATIONAL PRODUCTIONS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetAmah Mutsun Land Trust — $20,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPETERS VALLEY SCHOOL OF CRAFT INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNorth Bennet Street School — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ARTS AND CRAFTS — $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetESF COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE OF AMERICAN INDIAN ARTS FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE KRENOV FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetPAI FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMINORITIES IN SHARK SCIENCES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fort Mason CenterGordon E and Betty I …The San Francisco Fou…Marin Community Found…Windgate Charitable F…Humboldt Area Foundat…The Andrew W Mellon F…Resources Legacy FundJewish Community Fede…Silicon Valley Commun…The Nature ConservancyThe William & Flora H…
Fort Mason CenterCA30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fort Mason Center · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Windgate Charitable Foundation Inc · Humboldt Area Foundation · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Resources Legacy Fund · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Nature Conservancy · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Maxwellhanrahan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Marine Biological Laboratory — 20% of income from government
  • The Society of Arts and Crafts — 10% of income from government
  • Archbold Expeditions Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Willamette University — 1% of income from government
  • Native Arts and Cultures Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
40report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 168 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $14M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines