Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mary H Cain Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$850k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$4.6MReligion$2.2MEducation$2.1MRecreation & Sports$455kCivil Rights$450kArts & Culture$275kEnvironment$205kPublic Benefit$150kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $94k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.1M
$75,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$87M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL$850,000
TIRR FOUNDATION$850,000
ST MARTIN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$450,000
HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT OF KERSHAW COUNTY$230,000
Individual grant recipient$210,000
AVERY COUNTY SCHOOLS EDUCATION FUND$150,000
SURRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$125,000
TLR FOUNDATION$100,000
AMON CARTER MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART$100,000
SHELDON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$95,000
THE GOODNESS WEB FOUNDATION$75,000
Individual grant recipient$60,000
Individual grant recipient$55,000
NEUHAUS EDUCATION CENTER$50,000
INSTITUTE FOR THE PUBLIC TRUST$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE GOODNESS WEB FOUNDATION: $75k → 8%AMON CARTER MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $100k → 11%SHELDON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $95k → 16%HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT OF KERSHAW COUNTY: $230k → 12%AVERY COUNTY SCHOOLS EDUCATION FUND: $150k → 15%PIEDMONT LAND CONSERVANCY: $55k → 16%SURRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $125k → 17%THE GOODNESS WEB FOUNDATION: $50k → 8%SPLENDORA ISD: $55k → 9%AMON CARTER MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $100k → 11%SHELDON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $55k → 16%THE NATIONAL STEEPLECHASE MUSEUM: $75k → 12%LINVILLE FOUNDATION: $150k → 15%SHELDON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $55k → 16%LINVILLE FOUNDATION: $150k → 15%LINVILLE FOUNDATION: $150k → 15%LINVILLE FOUNDATION: $150k → 15%AVERY COUNTY SCHOOLS EDUCATION FUND: $150k → 15%LINVILLE FOUNDATION: $150k → 15%LINVILLE FOUNDATION: $150k → 15%TIRR FOUNDATION: $850k → 16%TIRR FOUNDATION: $300k → 16%TIRR FOUNDATION: $300k → 16%TIRR FOUNDATION: $250k → 16%TIRR FOUNDATION: $240k → 16%TIRR FOUNDATION: $240k → 16%TIRR FOUNDATION: $200k → 16%TIRR FOUNDATION: $200k → 16%HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL: $850k → 16%TLR FOUNDATION: $100k → 16%HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL: $150k → 16%HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL: $150k → 16%HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL: $75k → 16%HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL: $75k → 16%HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL: $75k → 16%HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL: $60k → 16%ST MARTIN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $450k → 16%ST MARTIN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $300k → 16%ST MARTIN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $300k → 16%ST MARTIN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $250k → 16%ST MARTIN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $250k → 16%ST MARTIN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $245k → 16%ST MARTIN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $245k → 16%ST MARTIN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $200k → 16%TEXAS INNOCENCE NETWORK: $210k → 16%TEXAS INNOCENCE NETWORK: $100k → 16%TEXAS INNOCENCE NETWORK: $100k → 16%HUMBLE ISD ATHLETICS: $60k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 22 repeat orgs$535k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
6

Total granted

$11M
$170k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+590%

Still filing today

41%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $365k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    TIRR Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +63%
  • LF
    LINVILLE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $900k · revenue +57% · 40% of their budget
  • MP
    Memorial Park Conservancy Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $455k · revenue +138%

Funded once

  • NS
    NATIONAL STEEPLECHASE MUSEUM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +590%
  • AR
    APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEATHCARE
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • BR
    BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +113%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Business Hall of Fame Foundation

To recognize the accomplishments and contributions of our outstanding Texas business leaders and to perpetuate and inspire the values of entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity, and community leadership in all generations of Texans.

Community Improvement
2
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
3
Wilson Medical Center Foundation

Assist Wilson Medical Center in its mission of promoting, improving, and restoring health.

Philanthropy
4
Texas Bar Foundation

The Foundation solicits charitable contributions and provides funding to enhance the rule of law and the system of justice in Texas, especially for programs that relate to the administration of justice; ethics in the legal profession;…

Crime & Legal
5
The Northeastern State University Foundation Inc

The NSU Foundation was created exclusively to benefit Northeastern State University for charitable, benevolent, educational, scientific and literary purposes.

Education
6
Texas Neurofibromatosis Foundation

To fund neurofibromatosis research and education and to provide for support groups for those facing the illness.

Health
7
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education
8
Austin Community College Foundation

Making education accessible for students through philanthropic support, aligned with Austin Community College (ACC) strategic priorities.

Education
9
Montgomery County Community Foundation

The mission of the Montgomery County Community Foundation (MCCF) is to provide leadership in Montgomery County by directing sustainable financial resources that strengthen our community and improve the quality of life for current and…

Philanthropy
10
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
11
Nrel Foundation

The NREL Foundation advances an affordable and secure energy future by catalyzing NREL's world-class energy research and innovation capabilities.

Environment
12
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Firefighters Helping Firefighters Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARTINS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $2,240,000 · OtherST MARTINS EPISCOPAL CHURCHHOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL: $1,485,000 · OtherHOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITALTLR FOUNDATION: $450,000 · OtherTLR FOUNDATIONSHELDON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $413,000 · OtherSHELDON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTIndividual grant recipient: $410,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAVERY COUNTY SCHOOLS EDUCATION FUND: $300,000 · OtherHEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT OF KERSHAW COUNTY: $230,000 · Other+12 more: $787,000 · Other+12 moreTIRR Foundation: $2,580,000 · HealthTIRR Foundation+1 more: $50,000 · HealthLINVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $900,000 · EducationLINVILLE F…SURRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · EducationSURRY COMM…+1 more: $10,000 · EducationMemorial Park Conservancy Inc: $455,000 · EnvironmentPIEDMONT LAND CONSERVANCY: $145,000 · Environment+1 more: $20,000 · EnvironmentAMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART: $200,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL STEEPLECHASE MUSEUM INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GOODNESS WEB FOUNDATION: $203,000 · PhilanthropyFIREFIGHTERS HELPING FIREFIGHTERS INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE INSTITUTE FOR THE PUBLIC TRUST: $135,000 · Public Benefit
Other$6,315,000Health$2,630,000Education$1,035,000Environment$620,000Arts & Culture$275,000Philanthropy$228,000Public Benefit$135,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTIRR Foundation: $2,580,000 over 8y, 21% of budgetLINVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $900,000 over 6y, 40% of budgetMemorial Park Conservancy Inc: $455,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetTHE GOODNESS WEB FOUNDATION: $203,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetAMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART: $200,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe W Oscar Neuhaus Memorial Foundation: $190,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetPIEDMONT LAND CONSERVANCY: $145,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR THE PUBLIC TRUST: $135,000 over 5y, 43% of budgetSURRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetFORREST GENERAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetFIREFIGHTERS HELPING FIREFIGHTERS INC: $25,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetBLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMBLE ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIRR Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LINVILLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Memorial Park Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE GOODNESS WEB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART ↗
  • Who funds The W Oscar Neuhaus Memorial Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR THE PUBLIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds SURRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL STEEPLECHASE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds FORREST GENERAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FIREFIGHTERS HELPING FIREFIGHTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMBLE ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX15.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mary H Cain Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mary H Cain Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Mary H Cain Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Mary H Cain Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary H Cain’s filings →

    More from the funding graph