Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Klion Springwater Coven Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$88k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$210kArts & Culture$134kHealth$85kReligion$82kCivil Rights$64kHuman Services$56kCrime & Legal$38kCommunity Improvement$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $49k
$1,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HORIZONS ALBUQUERQUE$15,000
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM$14,000
PHILANTHROPY KIDS$10,000
PROGRESS TEXAS INSTITUTE$10,000
J THE JEWISH NEWS$8,000
FOREST FORWARD$5,000
SOUTHWEST CREATIONS COLLABORATIVE$3,000
BOSQUE SCHOOL$3,000
WESST$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICE$2,000
HILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH$1,500
KALA ART INSTITUTE$1,500
THE GRIEF CENTER$1,000
HEADLANDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $1k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRAN: $250 → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRAN: $250 → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $150 → 10%THE FAMILY PLACE: $1k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $1k → 14%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICE: $8k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICE: $7k → 10%WESST: $3k → 14%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICE: $7k → 10%WESST: $3k → 14%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICE: $7k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICE: $7k → 10%WESST: $3k → 14%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICE: $4k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICE: $4k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICE: $3k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICE: $2k → 10%WESST: $2k → 14%WESST: $1k → 14%WESST: $1k → 14%WESST: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MN
IL
NY
MA
SD
CA
CO
KY
NM
DC
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of The Klion Springwater Coven Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Klion Springwater Coven Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.7% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$685k · 61 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

61 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 46 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
54

Total granted

$685k
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+8%

Still filing today

48%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalHealthCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    Episcopal Community Services
    9× · 2017–2025 · $49k · revenue +48%
  • BS
    Bosque School
    7× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +19%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $30k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • BT
    BOOKER T WASHINGTON HS PERFOMING AR
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • TJ
    TEXAS JUSTICE EDUCATION PROGRAM
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • From The Heart Productionsgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +86%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

7
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
8
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
9
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
10
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Food Banks and PantriesLocal History MuseumsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Arts CentersAnimal Rescue and ShelterJewish Community Organizati…Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%29%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/67
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,498

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 126 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/65
Grantees still filing
45/65
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM — $74,505 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH SHALOMHORIZONS ALBUQUERQUE — $67,500 · OtherHORIZONS ALBUQUERQUEJ THE JEWISH NEWS — $36,400 · OtherJ THE JEWISH NEWSNY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL LUNG FAILU — $25,000 · OtherHORIZONS OF NEW MEXICO — $20,000 · OtherBOSQUE SCHOOLHORIZONS ALBUQUERQUE — $19,500 · OtherACLU — $17,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST CREATIONS COLLABORATIVE — $18,500 · Other+78 more — $211,200 · Other+78 moreBosque School — $40,500 · EducationBosque Scho…PHILANTHROPY KIDS — $10,000 · EducationPHILANTHROP…MANZANO DAY SCHOOL — $7,000 · EducationMANZANO DAY…TEXAS TRIBUNE INC — $6,000 · EducationTEXAS TRIBU…Pitzer College — $5,000 · EducationPitzer Coll…MACALESTER COLLEGE — $4,000 · Education+9 more — $8,700 · Education+9 moreEpiscopal Community Services — $48,625 · Human ServicesEpiscopal C…THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $13,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCEN…WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP — $12,500 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S ECO…+3 more — $4,650 · Human Services+3 moreHEADLANDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $20,950 · Arts & CultureKala Art Institute — $13,350 · Arts & CultureFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC — $7,100 · Arts & CultureFrom The Heart Productions — $5,000 · Arts & CultureFund for Sustainable Tomorrows — $2,000 · Arts & Culture+7 more — $4,850 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $21,500 · Crime & LegalEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $18,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more — $1,000 · Crime & LegalPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC — $30,000 · Health+2 more — $1,000 · HealthProgress Texas Institute — $20,000 · Civil Rights
Other$489,605Education$81,200Human Services$78,775Arts & Culture$53,250Crime & Legal$40,500Health$31,000Civil Rights$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEpiscopal Community Services — $48,625 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBosque School — $40,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $21,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHEADLANDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $20,950 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetProgress Texas Institute — $20,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetSOUTHWEST CREATIONS COLLABORATIVE — $18,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $18,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $14,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKala Art Institute — $13,350 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP — $12,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC — $7,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHEADING HOME INC — $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMANZANO DAY SCHOOL — $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TRIBUNE INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPitzer College — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFrom The Heart Productions — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLESLEY UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMACALESTER COLLEGE — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDREAMSPRING — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANN MARTIN CENTER — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $2,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Family Place — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFund for Sustainable Tomorrows — $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $1,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO — $1,650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Museum of Art — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD RUNNERS — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBE THE SOLUTION INC % GERALDINE PHIPPS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetT'RUAH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAFRICARE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Craft and Design — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA of Texas — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORKERS DEFENSE PROJECT — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEST INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Village Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGRABHORN INSTITUTE — $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Episcopal Community Services
  • Who funds Bosque School
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds HEADLANDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS
  • Who funds Progress Texas Institute
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST CREATIONS COLLABORATIVE
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Kala Art Institute
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC
  • Who funds WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP
  • Who funds PHILANTHROPY KIDS
  • Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC
  • Who funds HEADING HOME INC
  • Who funds MANZANO DAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds TEXAS TRIBUNE INC
  • Who funds Pitzer College
  • Who funds FOREST FORWARD
  • Who funds From The Heart Productions
  • Who funds LESLEY UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MACALESTER COLLEGE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA21.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Swig Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Marin Community Foundation · The Lef Foundation · Lisa & Douglas Goldman Fund · 10129 Foundation · Robert and Dana Emery Family Foundation Rockefeller Trust Company · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Phyllis C Wattis Foundation · Fleishhacker Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Klion Springwater Coven Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Heading Home Inc17% of income from government
  • Lesley University1% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Klion Springwater Coven Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Klion Springwater Coven Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 126 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph