Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Jay & Rose Phillips Family Foundation of Colorado

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.5M
Granted FY2020
51
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$727k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of The Jay & Rose Phillips Family Foundation of Colorado’s FY2021 grant dollars went to American Endowment Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year The Jay & Rose Phillips Family Foundation of Colorado named its own grantees at scale: 44 organizations, $4M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

44
’17
51
’18
48
’19
44
’20
5
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2021.

Philanthropy$81MHuman Services$7.0MHealth$1.9MCommunity Improvement$628kEducation$588kCivil Rights$465kHousing & Shelter$273kEmployment$255kYouth Development$240kOther$3.2M
02FY2020 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • $10k–50k33 grants · $850k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
$35,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish Family Service of Colorado$727,359
Craig Hospital Foundation$371,390
Family Resource Center Association Inc$275,000
Jewish Community Center of Denver$194,066
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless$130,000
Colorado Nonprofit Development Center$125,000
JEWISHcolorado$120,000
Catholic Charities of Denver$112,000
Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains$100,000
Latino Community Foundation of Colorado$80,000
The Bell Policy Center$70,000
The Family Learning Center$50,000
Brothers Redevelopment Inc$50,000
National Jewish Health$50,000
Centro Humanitario Para Los Trabajadores$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $7.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Early Childhood Council Leadership Alliance Inc: $50k → 7%Sister Carmen Community Center: $25k → 12%Catholic Charities of Denver: $112k → 12%Early Childhood Council Leadership Alliance Inc: $50k → 7%Catholic Charities of Denver: $112k → 12%Early Childhood Council Leadership Alliance Inc: $50k → 7%Catholic Charities of Denver: $112k → 12%BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $120k → 12%Catholic Charities of Denver: $112k → 12%Emergency Family Assistance Association: $10k → 12%Emergency Family Assistance Association: $10k → 12%Emergency Family Assistance Association: $10k → 12%Attention Inc: $10k → 12%Shalom Cares: $80k → 8%Emergency Family Assistance Association: $10k → 12%Attention Homes: $10k → 12%Boulder Jewish Community Center: $355k → 12%Boulder Jewish Community Center: $325k → 12%Boulder Jewish Community Center: $290k → 12%Jewish Community Center of Denver: $194k → 12%Intercambio De Comunidades: $15k → 12%Intercambio De Comunidades: $15k → 12%Jewish Community Center of Denver: $171k → 12%Intercambio De Comunidades: $15k → 12%Intercambio De Comunidades: $15k → 12%Jewish Community Center of Denver: $106k → 12%Jewish Community Center of Denver: $84k → 12%Jewish Family Service of Colorado: $727k → 12%Jewish Family Service of Colorado: $727k → 12%Jewish Family Service of Colorado: $658k → 12%Jewish Family Service of Colorado: $658k → 12%Early Milestones Colorado: $50k → 12%Early Milestones Colorado: $50k → 12%Early Milestones Colorado: $50k → 12%Early Milestones Colorado: $50k → 12%Warren Village: $20k → 12%Warren Village: $20k → 12%Warren Village: $20k → 12%Warren Village: $20k → 12%Family Resource Center Association Inc: $300k → 12%Family Resource Center Association Inc: $285k → 12%Family Resource Center Association Inc: $285k → 12%Family Resource Center Association Inc: $275k → 12%Mi Casa Resource Center: $90k → 12%Florence Crittenton Services OF COLORADO: $40k → 12%Mi Casa Resource Center: $40k → 12%Mi Casa Resource Center: $40k → 12%Mi Casa Resource Center: $40k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 84% of The Jay & Rose Phillips Family Foundation of Colorado’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Jay & Rose Phillips Family Foundation of Coloradolessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14M · 58 repeat orgs$310k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

58 repeat relationships — 48 still active in FY2020, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

58
8

Total granted

$14M
$285k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
-1%

Still filing today

88%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementReligionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $2.8M · revenue +107%
  • CH
    Craig Hospital Foundation
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1.3M · revenue +111%
  • TB
    THE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    4× · 2017–2021 · $1.1M · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • SP
    SHALOM PARK
    one grant, 2017 · $80k · revenue -16%
  • TS
    THIRD SECTOR CAPITAL PARTNERS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -1%
  • DM
    DENVER METRO CHAMBER LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
2
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
3
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
4
Colorado Fiscal Institute

To provide timely, credible and accessible analyses of fiscal and economic issues facing colorado to inform public policy debates and promote economic prosperity

Community Improvement
5
Colorado Organization for Latina Opportunity and Reproductive Rights

Colorado organization for latina opportunity and reproductive rights (color) is a community-rooted nonprofit organization that works to enable latinx individuals and their families lead safe, healthy, self-determined lives.

Health
6
Colorado Jobs With Justice Inc

Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families

Employment
7
Colorado Chamber of Commerce Fka Co Assn of Commerce & Industry

The colorado chamber of commerce mission is to enhance the business climate of the state of colorado by promoting a positive legislative and regulatory environment and providing programs and services for its members, economic education,…

—
8
Colorado Campaign for Inclusive Excellence

The mission of the center for legal inclusiveness (cli) is to advance diversity in the legal profession by actively educating and supporting private and public sector legal organizations in their individual campaigns to create cultures of…

Civil Rights
9
Colorado Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Advancing the well-being of all coloradans through relationships free from abuse and oppression.

Human Services
10
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
11
Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce

The denver metro chamber of commerce is the architect of tomorrow, igniting change and driving progress to build dynamic economies and communities. we champion innovation, forge powerful partnerships, and relentlessly advocate for our…

—
12
Denver Early Childhood Council

The vision of denver's early childhood council (the "council") is that denver is a community where the diverse needs of all children and their families are supported. the council elevates the early childhood field through innovative and…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Children's Campaign and the most unlike its peers is Mpowered. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr18%30%20–35yr12%43%35–55yr14%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr18%90%20–35yr12%5%35–55yr14%4%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/62
the rest of the field
13%
1,000/7,865

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/62
Grantees still filing
48/62
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $80,417,874 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION+4 more — $892,085 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC — $2,771,519 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ASSOCIATION — $1,145,000 · Human ServicesTHE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $1,090,426 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF DENVER — $555,418 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER — $448,000 · Human Services+11 more — $945,000 · Human ServicesColorado Coalition for the Homeless — $620,000 · OtherFAMILY LEARNING CENTER — $200,000 · OtherCENTRO HUMANITARIO PARA LOS TRABAJADORES — $200,000 · OtherGAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL & TRANSGEND COMMUNITY CENTER OF COLORADO — $180,000 · OtherCOLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGN — $160,000 · OtherADL Mountain States Region — $160,000 · OtherThe Gathering Place — $150,000 · OtherALLIED HOUSING INC — $149,864 · OtherBROTHERS REDEVELOPMENT INC — $200,000 · OtherBAYAUD ENTERPRISES INC — $255,000 · OtherINVEST IN KIDS — $160,000 · OtherCOLORADO CENTER ON LAW AND POLICY — $221,000 · Other+22 more — $1,342,800 · OtherCraig Hospital Foundation — $1,314,170 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $275,000 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $200,000 · HealthCOLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $120,000 · HealthTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $453,000 · Community ImprovementMARIA DROSTE SERVICES OF COLORADO INC — $145,000 · Community ImprovementCOLORADO NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION — $30,000 · Community ImprovementEMILY GRIFFITH FOUNDATION — $160,000 · EducationLARADON FOUNDATION INC — $120,000 · EducationPARENT POSSIBLE — $100,000 · EducationDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $80,000 · EducationSEWALL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $78,000 · EducationFAMILY STAR INC — $40,000 · Education+1 more — $10,000 · EducationTHE BELL POLICY CENTER — $344,675 · Civil RightsADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN — $120,000 · Civil Rights
Philanthropy$81,309,959Human Services$6,955,363Other$3,998,664Health$1,909,170Community Improvement$628,000Education$588,000Civil Rights$464,675

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $80,417,874 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC — $2,771,519 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetCraig Hospital Foundation — $1,314,170 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ASSOCIATION — $1,145,000 over 4y, 24% of budgetTHE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $1,090,426 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF DENVER — $555,418 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetJEWISHColorado — $542,085 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $453,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER — $448,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BELL POLICY CENTER — $344,675 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $275,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBAYAUD ENTERPRISES INC — $255,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetRose Community Foundation — $230,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOLORADO CENTER ON LAW AND POLICY — $221,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetMI CASA RESOURCE CENTER — $210,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetFAMILY LEARNING CENTER — $200,000 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEARLY MILESTONES COLORADO — $200,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetCENTRO HUMANITARIO PARA LOS TRABAJADORES — $200,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetBROTHERS REDEVELOPMENT INC — $200,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetGAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL & TRANSGEND COMMUNITY CENTER OF COLORADO — $180,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetINVEST IN KIDS — $160,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetEMILY GRIFFITH FOUNDATION — $160,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetCOLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGN — $160,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetEARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE INC — $150,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetALLIED HOUSING INC — $149,864 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetMARIA DROSTE SERVICES OF COLORADO INC — $145,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN — $120,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetCOLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $120,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetMETROVOLUNTEERS — $120,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetLARADON FOUNDATION INC — $120,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetTOOLS OF THE MIND — $100,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE ST FRANCIS CENTER — $100,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPARENT POSSIBLE — $100,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetCOLORADO YOUTH FOR A CHANGE — $80,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetLATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC — $80,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSHALOM PARK — $80,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWARREN VILLAGE INC — $80,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetGROWING HOME INC — $80,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSEWALL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $78,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INITIATIVE FOR WOMEN WITH DISABILITIES — $75,000 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetURBAN PEAK DENVER — $72,800 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO — $70,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCOLORADO CROSS DISABILITY COALITION — $70,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY SHARES OF COLORADO INC — $70,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetINTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES — $60,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetWEDONTWASTE INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rose Community Founda…Colorado Gives Founda…The Denver FoundationRose FoundationThe Colorado Health F…Caring for Colorado F…Mile High United Way …Daniels FundTemple Hoyne Buell Fo…Anschutz Family Found…The Anschutz Foundati…Hill Foundation Wells…
Rose Community FoundationCO83.3× affinity41 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Rose Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Daniels Fund · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · Hill Foundation Wells Fargo Bank Na

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Jay & Rose Phillips Family Foundation of Colorado funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Third Sector Capital Partners Inc — 16% of income from government
  • Tools of the Mind — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
33report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Jay & Rose Phillips Family Foundation of Colorado?

Find your warmest path to The Jay & Rose Phillips Family Foundation of Colorado through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines