· Public charity
Rose Foundation
See Schedule O.The purpose of the Foundation is to enhance the quality of life in the seven-county greater Denver community by identifying and supporting programs in the areas of aging, child and family development, education, health and Jewish life.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 153 grants below total $7,467,789 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $11,243,843 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,776,054 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2017
- Under $10k25 grants · $151k
- $10k–50k89 grants · $1.9M
- $50k–250k32 grants · $3.2M
- $250k+7 grants · $2.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Rose Community Foundation | $420,667 |
| Colorado Center on Law and Policy | $361,360 |
| UpStart | $323,211 |
| Colorado Children's Campaign | $315,200 |
| Colorado Nonprofit Development Center | $296,300 |
| Aurora Public School District | $275,675 |
| Via Mobility Services | $260,000 |
| Teach Plus | $225,000 |
| OneTable | $200,500 |
| Colorado Department of Human Services | $200,000 |
| Volunteers of America Colorado Branch | $166,000 |
| The Colorado Education Initiative | $150,000 |
| Staenberg-Loup Jewish Community Center | $140,036 |
| Jewish Family Service of Colorado | $132,550 |
| The Wexner Foundation | $125,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.
The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…
Services provided in arapahoe county colorado related to early childhood education intervention issues.
Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families
The mission of education commission of the states is to advocate for attaining educational excellence for all and to help state leaders identify, develop and implement public policy for education that addresses current and future needs of…
The mission of the center for legal inclusiveness (cli) is to advance diversity in the legal profession by actively educating and supporting private and public sector legal organizations in their individual campaigns to create cultures of…
Our mission is to empower colorado students to achieve a lifetime of economic understanding and financial freedom. how will we achieve this mission? by providing economic and personal financial education to students through training…
Empower colorado education leaders through advocacy, professional learning and networking to deliver on the promise of public education
Prime health advances health justice, equity, access quality and cost through innovation, collaboration, and community building.
Colorado Thrives exists to support Coloradans to achieve economic mobility through access to good jobs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthy Child Care Colorado and the most unlike its peers is Wexner Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
139 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 139 of the 149 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Rose Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds COLORADO CENTER ON LAW AND POLICY ↗
- Who funds UPSTART BAY AREA ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds COLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGN ↗
- Who funds Via Mobility Services ↗
- Who funds TEACH PLUS INC ↗
- Who funds ONETABLE INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO EDUCATION INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds WEXNER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENVER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRESS ↗
- Who funds DENTAL AID ↗
- Who funds COLORADO COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds Center for African American Health ↗
- Who funds GEORGE W CLAYTON TRUST ↗
- Who funds ALLIED HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds THE BELL POLICY CENTER ↗
- Who funds RISE COLORADO ↗
- Who funds PARENT POSSIBLE ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS COLORADO ↗
- Who funds EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds EKAR ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds CIVIC NEWS COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Youth Medical and Nursing ↗
- Who funds BROTHERS REDEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds INVEST IN KIDS ↗
- Who funds NOURISH COLORADO ↗
- Who funds COLORADO ORGANIZATION FOR LATINA OPPORTUNITY AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds COLORADO GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Daniels Fund · Mile High United Way Inc · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · Hill Foundation Wells Fargo Bank Na · Delta Dental Plan of Colorado Foundation Inc · The Anschutz Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rose Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.