· Private foundation
The Hws Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k15 grants · $495k
- $50k–250k64 grants · $5.8M
- $250k+12 grants · $4.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SALESMANSHIP CLUB OF DALLAS | $620,000 |
| AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS | $465,000 |
| JOURNEY FORWARD MENTORING | $465,000 |
| THE BISHOP ENRIQUE SAN PEDRO OZANAM CENTER INC | $465,000 |
| ELLIPSIS INC | $445,000 |
| MARATHON PUBLIC LIBRARY AND HISTORY MUSEUM | $415,000 |
| CHILDREN & FAMILY URBAN MINISTRIES | $320,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD SOLIDARITY FUND | $315,000 |
| FAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC | $290,000 |
| THE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY | $253,612 |
| UNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $250,000 |
| PALACIOS COMMUNITY HUB | $250,000 |
| PROJECT ARRIBA (ADVANCE RETRAINING AND REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE IN BOR | $200,000 |
| VALLEY INITIATIVE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ADVANCEMENT | $200,000 |
| VICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER | $190,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $13.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
137 repeat relationships — 64 still active in FY2025, 73 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ILIowa Legal Aid4× · 2021–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +5%
- FCFOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS5× · 2020–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +175%
- YAYOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC2× · 2023–2024 · $995k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INCone grant, 2024 · $1.0M · revenue 0%
- GGGATEWAY GLOBAL AMERICAN YOUTH & BUSINESS ALLIANCE INCone grant, 2024 · $460k · revenue 0% · 38% of their budget
- EPEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGERone grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue -20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mica helps families experencing poverty meet their needs, build on their strengths, and achieve their goals.
Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…
Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.
In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.
The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.
Through dynamic partnerships, quality family services, advocacy and education, neicac advances community development and improves social and economic conditions for individuals and families with limited resources.
The mission of cornerhouse is to partner with families, communities, and systems - entrusted with the safety of children, youth and vulnerable adults - to reduce trauma and end abuse.
Upper des moines opportunity, inc. is dedicated to helping build stronger communities by addressing the effects of poverty on individuals and families.upper des moines opportunity, inc. will strengthen communities through: the promotion of…
To provide leadership in our communities to 1) identify our most pressing human care needs, 2) to work together to direct the time, energy and resources towards addressing those needs to improve our quality of life.
To provide advocacy and services for disadvantaged persons and bring about institutional change for the benefit of the people we serve and the community at large. (see schedule o).to achieve this mission, scicap operates programs to…
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waypoint Services and the most unlike its peers is Eat Greater Des Moines. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
187 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 187 of the 196 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Iowa Legal Aid ↗
- Who funds FOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Journey Forward Mentoring ↗
- Who funds ELLIPSIS INC ↗
- Who funds Love Columbia Corp Love Columbia ↗
- Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE BISHOP ENRIQUE SAN PEDRO OZANAM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CASA DE SALUD ↗
- Who funds PALACIOS COMMUNITY HUB ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
- Who funds Salesmanship Club of Dallas ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS ↗
- Who funds Texas Appleseed ↗
- Who funds THE STANTON CHILD RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds STL YOUTH JOBS ↗
- Who funds VICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CAMERON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds The Family Place ↗
- Who funds Provident Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL CONCERN INC CATHOLIC CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds VALLEY INITIATIVE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ADVANCEMENT ↗
- Who funds TANAGER PLACE ↗
- Who funds THE WYMAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST MISSOURI FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds KINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL ↗
- Who funds READY READERS ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank ↗
- Who funds IOWA FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA JOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES INC ↗
- Who funds LOGOS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF BROWNSVILLE DBA COME DREAM COME BUILD ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE ↗
- Who funds THE CONCILIO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Central Iowa · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Delta Dental of Iowa Foundation · Mid-Iowa Health Foundation · Prairie Meadows Race Track and Casino Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · GreenState Credit Union · Telligen Community Initiative · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Greenstate Foundation · Lsb Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hws Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Hws Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Hws Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.