Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Telligen Community Initiative

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$142k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$8.5MHuman Services$2.1MEducation$1.6MCommunity Improvement$1.2MEmployment$962kCrime & Legal$936kHousing & Shelter$588kFood & Nutrition$536kOther$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $539k
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $1.7M
$48,710
Median grant
4
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TELLIGEN COMMUNITY INITIATIVE SYNERGY CENTER$141,873
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DES MOINES - FISCAL AGENT FOR CENTRAL IOWA$100,000
CROSSOVER HEALTH SERVICES$99,997
CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION$99,829
TULSA AREA UNITED WAY$90,000
IMANI'S VILLAGE INC$89,500
PEACEFUL FAMILY OKLAHOMA$75,000
LITTLE HEROES LEAGUE$75,000
OPTIONS FOR YOUTH$75,000
SHAWNEE HEALTH SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$75,000
MERCER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$75,000
PARENT PROMISE$75,000
ONE HOPE UNITED$75,000
COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT - TULSA COUNTY$75,000
KREIDER SERVICES INC$74,614
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE COMMON GOOD: $74k → 14%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $50k → 17%YOUTH AND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 19%BUILDING DIRECTION FOR FAMILIES INC: $50k → 10%ELDERBRIDGE AGENCY ON AGING: $50k → 12%YOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC: $50k → 17%WELLSPRING COMMUNITY: $3k → 3%YOUTH AND FAMILY COUNSELING: $50k → 8%FAMILYCORE: $25k → 14%HEALTH ALLIANCE FOR THE UNINSURED: $50k → 15%CITY CARE: $45k → 16%YOUTH AND FAMILY RESOURCES CENTER INC: $50k → 19%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $29k → 9%FAMILY INC: $75k → 12%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $50k → 12%STATUS CODE 4 INC (SC4I): $10k → 9%FOSTER SOURCE: $25k → 10%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $25k → 10%IOWA CITY HOSPICE: $35k → 15%COLORADO CHILDREN'S IMMUNIZATION COALITION: $49k → 10%YWCA TULSA: $50k → 15%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $45k → 14%YOUTH OUTREACH SERVICES: $20k → 14%LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $50k → 12%RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $50k → 15%LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $50k → 12%RENAISSANCE SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $16k → 14%COMMUNITY SERVICE COUNCIL: $50k → 15%NDOULA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC: $75k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $75k → 14%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $75k → 15%PROJECT IOWA: $50k → 10%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $50k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT OF TULSA COUNTY: $75k → 15%COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT - TULSA COUNTY: $75k → 15%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $50k → 14%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $50k → 15%COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT OF TULSA COUNTY: $25k → 15%OPTIONS FOR YOUTH: $75k → 14%BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $50k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME AND AID: $75k → 14%THRIVING FAMILIES: $75k → 12%IGNITE: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of Telligen Community Initiative’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 25% of the giving stays in IA; read by stated purpose it is 21% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Telligen Community Initiativelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.8% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.3M · 46 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

46 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
237

Total granted

$5.3M
$11M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+15%

Still filing today

83%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SHAWNEE HEALTH SERVICE & DEVEL CORP
    3× · 2023–2025 · $300k · revenue +5%
  • COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT OF TULSA COUNTY INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $175k · revenue +16%
  • The University of Tulsa
    2× · 2023–2024 · $148k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • TC
    TELLIGEN COMMUNITY INITIATIVE SYNERGY
    one grant, 2024 · $133k
  • OS
    OKLAHOMA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $90k
  • TY
    THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER DES MOINES
    one grant, 2020 · $88k · revenue +3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
2
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

3
Community Health Centers of Southeastern Iowa Inc

To provide primary health care to residents of the greater se iowa region, especially those individuals/families with limited resources or with other barriers to health care. see schedule o for additional information.

Health
4
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
5
Infant Welfare Society of Chicago

Infant welfare society of chicago (iws) (d/b/a iws family health) provides quality medical, dental and behavioral health services for the health, physical and mental development of children and their families in the chicagoland community.

6
Community Health Partnership of Illinois

Strive to improve the health and well being of migrant and seasonal farmworkers and other medically vulnerable populations by providing quality accessable, affordable, and culturally responsive health care within the community we serve.

Health
7
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
8
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

9
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
10
Interior Community Health Center

Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.

Health
11
Community Health Center of Central Wyoming Inc

To maintain a high quality patient care delivery system that provides access to comprehensive health care services, regardless of ability to pay. it is the desire of chccw to treat all patients with the dignity and respect they deserve…

Health
12
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health and Medicine Policy Research Group and the most unlike its peers is Colorado Health Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Health Access Advocacy and …Affordable Housing Developm…Community College Foundatio…Community FoundationsSenior Support ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Lgbtq+ Community SupportFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Development ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsPregnancy Support ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportCancer Support ServicesFood Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr16%21%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.4%1/230
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,335

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

224 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 224 of the 314 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
54
Early backer (in before they grew)
221/224
Grantees still filing
145/224
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TELLIGEN COMMUNITY INITIATIVE SYNERGY CENTER — $441,960 · OtherTELLIGEN COMMUNITY INITIATIVE SYNERGY CENTERTELLIGEN COMMUNITY INITIATIVE SYNERGY CENTER (SHARED OFFICE SPACE - HUBBELL — $239,223 · Other+97 more — $6,199,178 · Other+97 moreSHAWNEE HEALTH SERVICE & DEVEL CORP — $300,000 · HealthSHAWNEE HEALTH SERVICE & DEVE…GYEDI PROJECT — $149,562 · HealthCOLORADO HEALTH INSTITUTE — $145,000 · HealthIMANIS VILLAGE INC — $129,500 · HealthIOWA BLACK DOULA COLLECTIVE — $126,400 · HealthVariety Care Inc — $125,000 · HealthHEALTH AND MEDICINE POLICY RESEARCH GROUP — $124,004 · Health+40 more — $2,589,239 · Health+40 moreCOMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT OF TULSA COUNTY INC — $175,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTIO…ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $125,000 · Human ServicesERIE NEIGHBORHO…YOUTH AND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesLABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING — $100,000 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINISTRY — $95,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL — $75,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES — $75,000 · Human ServicesChicago Volunteer Doulas Inc — $75,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesOPTIONS FOR YOUTH — $75,000 · Human ServicesNDoula Community Alliance Incorporated — $75,000 · Human ServicesTHRIVING FAMILIES — $75,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMON GOOD INC — $73,975 · Human Services+15 more — $750,000 · Human Services+15 moreThe University of Tulsa — $147,981 · EducationOklahoma Christian University — $123,775 · EducationCOLORADO COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $75,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 · EducationIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $50,000 · EducationOPPORTUNITIES INC — $50,000 · EducationSISTERS WORKING IT OUT — $50,000 · EducationHUNGER FREE COLORADO — $75,000 · Food & NutritionPathways to a Healthy Stephens County Inc — $50,000 · Food & NutritionBOULDER FOOD RESCUE — $50,000 · Food & NutritionIOWA FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION — $50,000 · Food & NutritionHUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC — $50,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC — $50,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $50,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING ILLINOIS — $50,000 · Food & NutritionLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC — $125,000 · Crime & LegalElyssas Mission NFP — $99,925 · Crime & LegalEXCHANGE CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE OF OKLAHOMA INC — $75,000 · Crime & LegalIowa Legal Aid — $50,000 · Crime & LegalROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER — $50,000 · Crime & LegalPROJECT ANGEL HEART — $110,000 · Community ImprovementHEALTHTEAMWORKS — $75,000 · Community ImprovementCenter for African American Health — $75,000 · Community ImprovementMARIA DROSTE SERVICES OF COLORADO INC — $74,935 · Community ImprovementUNITED WAYS OF IOWA — $50,000 · Community Improvement
Other$6,880,361Health$3,688,705Human Services$1,943,975Education$621,756Food & Nutrition$425,000Crime & Legal$399,925Community Improvement$384,935

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSHAWNEE HEALTH SERVICE & DEVEL CORP — $300,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT OF TULSA COUNTY INC — $175,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe University of Tulsa — $147,981 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO HEALTH INSTITUTE — $145,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetIMANIS VILLAGE INC — $129,500 over 2y, 41% of budgetIOWA BLACK DOULA COLLECTIVE — $126,400 over 2y, 38% of budgetLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC — $125,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $125,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetVariety Care Inc — $125,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUBUQUE — $125,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNEW WORKFORCE DIRECTIONS INC — $125,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetHEALTH AND MEDICINE POLICY RESEARCH GROUP — $124,004 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetOklahoma Christian University — $123,775 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL HEART — $110,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetDENTAL CONNECTIONS INC — $110,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetUNITY HEALTHCARE — $107,898 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES - DENVER CASA — $100,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetARAPAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetYOUTH AND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $100,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetCENTENNIAL MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING — $100,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetMETROPOLITAN TENANTS ORGANIZATION — $100,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetCREOKS MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA DENTAL FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetIowa Primary Care Association Inc — $100,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetOMNI INSTITUTE — $99,987 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetElyssas Mission NFP — $99,925 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INC — $99,829 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCOLORADO PERINATAL CARE QUALITY COLLABORATIVE — $99,568 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN COLORADO AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER — $96,352 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY — $95,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ARCHER GROUP — $93,953 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER DES MOINES — $88,490 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetALLIANCECHICAGO — $80,640 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA COCINA — $75,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetIOWA CAREGIVERS — $75,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES — $75,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHEALTHTEAMWORKS — $75,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetChicago Volunteer Doulas Inc — $75,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCOLORADO COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHUNGER FREE COLORADO — $75,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetVNA Health Care — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVISION TO LEARN — $75,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY INC — $75,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetOPTIONS FOR YOUTH — $75,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetCenter for African American Health — $75,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

The Colorado Health FoundationCO61.5× affinity44 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Colorado Health Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Delta Dental of Iowa Foundation · Mid-Iowa Health Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Hws Charitable Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · Visiting Nurse Association of Chicago (Aka) Vna Foundation · Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Telligen Community Initiative funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 130%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • Hunger Free Oklahoma Inc100% of income from government
  • Southern Plains Tribal Health Board Foundation83% of income from government
  • United Community Action Program Inc62% of income from government
  • Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc37% of income from government
  • Community Health Connection Inc18% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services15% of income from government
  • Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc13% of income from government
  • Variety Care Inc9% of income from government
  • Opportunities Inc8% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma8% of income from government
  • Central Oklahoma American Indian Health Council Inc5% of income from government
  • Good Shepherd Community Clinicinc5% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa5% of income from government
  • Ywca Tulsa Inc3% of income from government
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc1% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Christian University0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
94report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 314 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph