Skip to content

Montana · Nonprofit

CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE

CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE (Montana) receives grants from 78 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,291,555 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($705,651). 55 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 59% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$3.5M
Funders on record
78
Grants received
$2.3M
Net assets
$8.1M
55/78 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 13%
01What it does

What Central Asia Institute does

Mission

To advance education and livelihood skills, especially for girls and women, in the remote and mountainous regions of afghanistan, pakistan and tajikistan.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Cai supports an array of programs focused on increasing access to quality education, and developing livelihood skills, especially for girls and women. During the period ended september 30, 2025, cai's largest programs as measured by expenses included:1) improving the quality of education by funding teacher salaries, training, and professional development.2) supporting women's economic independence and income generation through women's entrepreneurship and livelihoods training and assistance.3) improving access to safe educational environments including renovating school facilities, sanitation and hygiene facilities, and school boundary walls.

    $2,421,852 spentof which $1,985,800 as grants
    90% of program spending
  2. Cai global outreach program:improving access to safe educational environments including renovating school facilities, sanitation and hygiene facilities, and school boundary walls.

    $273,567 spent$4,800 earned by the program
    10% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,695,419.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($5.8M) Expenses 100 ($5.3M) Net assets 100 ($10M)2018 Revenue 49 ($2.9M) Expenses 84 ($4.4M) Net assets 86 ($8.8M)2019 Revenue 37 ($2.2M) Expenses 57 ($3.0M) Net assets 98 ($10M)2020 Revenue 44 ($2.5M) Expenses 61 ($3.2M) Net assets 94 ($9.6M)2021 Revenue 50 ($2.9M) Expenses 51 ($2.7M) Net assets 103 ($11M)2022 Revenue 49 ($2.8M) Expenses 61 ($3.2M) Net assets 81 ($8.3M)2023 Revenue 47 ($2.7M) Expenses 67 ($3.6M) Net assets 80 ($8.2M)2024 Revenue 47 ($2.7M) Expenses 67 ($3.6M) Net assets 82 ($8.3M)2025 Revenue 61 ($3.5M) Expenses 66 ($3.5M) Net assets 80 ($8.1M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (61)Expenses (66)Net assets (80)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $11M to $8.5M (−21%).

$14M
$12M
$11M
$9.8M
$11M
$8.5M
$8.3M
$8.5M
$8.3M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

73% of CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (97% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,679 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$504k
’17
−$1.6M
’18
−$864k
’19
−$683k
’20
$215k
’21
−$408k
’22
−$828k
’23
−$829k
’24
$63k
’25
2.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Alice Thomas

Executive director

Board chair

Javed Khan

Board chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2019 and FY2020 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed14141312121081210
Joined·+4+1+7+2+1+1+4+2
No longer listed·42823304
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 22 funders to 33 funders, grant income rose $117k → $277k.

14 of 78 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 59% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 78 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 31% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

62% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE.

31%
largest funder
46%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 45% · 2018 21% · 2019 31% · 2020 23% · 2021 22% · 2022 27% · 2023 24% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

40% of CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 71% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

59% of CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $945k that is directly attributable, 99% of it comes from funders outside Montana, across 23 states.

NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
WY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
DE
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Montana out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.3M arriving through sponsors registered in 11 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE's revenue fell 39% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin2% · below the median
Months of reserve2.1mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−6% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 718 international nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Montana

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

78% of spending goes to programs.

Program 78%Management 12%Fundraising 10%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

90%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 28 states

NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
KY
WV
VA
MD
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
HI
MS
AL
GA
FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE?
CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE (Montana) receives grants from 78 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,291,555 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($705,651). 55 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 59% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE have?
IRS filings report 78 organizations giving $2,291,555 in grants to CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE, 55 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $705,651 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Montana. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Central Asia Institute →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 78 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing