Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hickey Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$491k
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$793kEducation$719kHuman Services$400kEnvironment$276kArts & Culture$205kHealth$166kHousing & Shelter$105kYouth Development$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $119k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $167k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $205k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION$100,000
GIVE DIRECTLY$55,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
GLOBAL GIVING$35,000
FLORIDA AMERICAN LEGION-JOHN G DORAN MEMORIAL POST 158$25,000
COOL EARTH$20,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO$15,000
HOPE SERVICES HAWAII$12,000
DIRECT RELIEF$10,000
MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION$10,000
HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL$10,000
HOLUALOA FOUNDATION OF ARTS AND CULTURE$10,000
THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA$10,000
THE NIGHT MINISTRY$10,000
TAHIRIH JUSTICE CCENTER$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $2k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $2k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $2k → 13%JOURNEYCARE: $5k → 14%MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $10k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $10k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $10k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $7k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $6k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 50 repeat orgs$287k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against -15% for those funded once.

50 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
20

Total granted

$2.7M
$238k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-15%

Still filing today

78%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    The Against Malaria Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $509k · revenue +29%
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    5× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +20%
  • CE
    COOL EARTH ACTION USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $87k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOLARAID CHARITY
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • BH
    BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE OF ILLINOIS SCHOLARS
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • PH
    PROJECT HAWAII INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc

For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…

International
4
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
5
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
6
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
7
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
8
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
9
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
10
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
11
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
12
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Defense; the most unlike its peers is Cool Earth Action Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/57
Grantees still filing
33/57
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOLARAID CHARITY: $100,000 · OtherSOLARAID CHARITYOTHER CHARITABLE INSTITUTIONS (EACH LESS THAN 2000): $80,000 · OtherOTHER CHARITABLE INSTITUTIONS (EACH LESS…HOPE SERVICES HAWAII INC: $57,000 · OtherST ELIZABETH CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago: $45,000 · OtherPRATHAM USA: $37,000 · OtherTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $48,000 · Other+40 more: $508,005 · Other+40 moreThe Against Malaria Foundation: $509,000 · HealthThe Against Malaria Fo…AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $50,000 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SC…MALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC: $22,000 · Health+3 more: $17,000 · HealthTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $505,000 · EducationTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSI…THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $49,500 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF …+2 more: $12,000 · EducationGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $214,000 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTL…THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $49,000 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT M…MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human ServicesMISERICORDI…+2 more: $11,000 · Human ServicesDIRECT RELIEF: $90,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 · InternationalHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $35,000 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $12,000 · InternationalNEW INCENTIVES: $10,000 · International+3 more: $10,000 · InternationalChicago Architecture Foundation: $55,000 · Arts & CultureHOLUALOA FOUNDATION FOR ARTS & CULTURE: $43,000 · Arts & CultureChicago Symphony Orchestra: $31,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FLORIDA ORCHESTRA: $6,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $6,000 · Arts & CultureCOOL EARTH ACTION USA INC: $87,000 · EnvironmentCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $8,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $6,000 · Environment+2 more: $4,500 · Environment
Other$1,075,005Health$598,000Education$566,500Human Services$304,000International$227,000Arts & Culture$141,000Environment$105,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Against Malaria Foundation: $509,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $505,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $214,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $90,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOOL EARTH ACTION USA INC: $87,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE SERVICES HAWAII INC: $57,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Architecture Foundation: $55,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $49,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $49,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $48,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOLUALOA FOUNDATION FOR ARTS & CULTURE: $43,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $37,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROGRAMS HAWAII: $33,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREADING POWER INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetPROJECT HAWAII INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC: $22,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE IGNITES CHICAGO: $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $15,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $15,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW INCENTIVES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Stage Company Inc: $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $6,005 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FLORIDA ORCHESTRA: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHildegard House Incorporated: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Seafarers Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetElea Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEckerd College: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Against Malaria Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds COOL EARTH ACTION USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE SERVICES HAWAII INC ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Architecture Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds HOLUALOA FOUNDATION FOR ARTS & CULTURE ↗
  • Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
  • Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROGRAMS HAWAII ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds READING POWER INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HAWAII INC ↗
  • Who funds MALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IGNITES CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA11.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hickey Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hickey Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Eckerd College: 0% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hickey Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph