· Private foundation
The Harold and Kate Reed Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k62 grants · $223k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $249k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| CROS MINISTRIES-CHRISTIANS REACHING OUT TO SOCIETY INC | $20,000 |
| (THE) LORD'S PLACE | $20,000 |
| FEED THE HUNGRY PANTRY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY | $20,000 |
| ADOPT A FAMILY OF THE PALM BEACHES INC | $20,000 |
| COMMONBOND COMMUNITIES | $20,000 |
| WORLD WILDLIFE FUND | $15,000 |
| HOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST | $15,000 |
| PORTER-GAUD FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| FEEDING AMERICA | $11,000 |
| AMERICARES | $10,000 |
| HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL INC | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $10,000 |
| MERCY HOUSING | $10,000 |
| ORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
82 repeat relationships — 65 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HPHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY6× · 2018–2024 · $221k · revenue +81%
- FTFEED THE HUNGRY PANTRY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC6× · 2018–2024 · $120k · revenue ×11
- AOAdopt-A-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc6× · 2018–2024 · $115k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- BTBATH & TENNIS HISTORIC BUILDING PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -2%
- ERE4E RELIEF LLCone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -21%
- TITHE INSTITUTE OF WORLD POLITICSgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +70%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…
Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.
We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…
Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tiger Woods Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is I Stand With My Pack Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 131 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FEED THE HUNGRY PANTRY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Adopt-A-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BENJAMIN PRIVATE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Christians Reaching Out To Society Inc ↗
- Who funds THE LORD'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds PORTER-GAUD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMONBOND COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INC ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE FUTURES INC ↗
- Who funds HOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BATH & TENNIS HISTORIC BUILDING PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE INC ↗
- Who funds LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds Balsam Mountain Trust ↗
- Who funds TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
- Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds THE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Donald Grant & Ann Martin Calder Foundat · St Clair Charitable Trust · Woodward Family Charitable Foundation · The Mary Alice Fortin Foundation · United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · The David and Elizabeth Long Foundation · Legatus Foundation · The Patton Charitable Foundation · Stephanie & Lawrence Flinn Jrcharitable Trust · CMB Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Harold and Kate Reed Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Farm Aid Inc — 100% of income from government
- Delaware Futures Inc — 78% of income from government
- Safespace Inc — 25% of income from government
- Homeless Emergency Project Inc — 15% of income from government
- Adopt-a-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc — 15% of income from government
- The Lord's Place Inc — 12% of income from government
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
- Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
- Family Promise Inc — 2% of income from government
- Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc — 2% of income from government
- Lewis & Clark College — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Martin County — 2% of income from government
- The Banner Lake Club Inc — 1% of income from government
- United Way of Palm Beach County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Fairfield Historical Society Dba Fairfield Museum — 1% of income from government
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Place of Hope Inc — 0% of income from government
- Global Empowerment Mission Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Harold and Kate Reed Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Harold and Kate Reed Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.