How much did THE FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS grant in FY2025?

Human Services$456kHealth$269kEducation$161kYouth Development$97kHousing & Shelter$54kFood & Nutrition$32kCrime & Legal$28kPhilanthropy$27kScience & Tech$13kOther$396k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

treatmentbreast cancerpatientsmembersoperatingprogramadultscomprehensive

2021

orionkennettwomen's healthdentalsuccesstrainingvocational

2022

warehousemom'swomen'spoint

2023

treatmentpatientsmemberslivingblackintegrative therapiesbreast cancer

2024

mahmeeimmigrantsafedignityspiritualsee pagepage part

2025

immigrantmahmeedignitysee pagepage partpart iiiiii statement

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k5 grants · $42k
$10k–50k12 grants · $168k

$13,500

Median grant

States reached

$5.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

MOM'S HOUSE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA$17,925
BRIDGE OF HOPE CHESTER COUNTY$16,925
CRIME VICTIMS' CENTER OF CHESTER CO$13,500
ALIANZAS DE PHOENIXVILLE$13,500
THE CLINIC$13,500
YOUNGMOMS$13,500
4TH TRIMESTER MAHMEE$13,500
PROJECT LIBERTAD$13,500
SAFE HARBOR OF CHESTER COUNTY$13,500
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER OF CHESTER$13,500
LCH HEALTH AND COMMUNITY SERVICES$13,500
THE GARAGE COMMUNITY & YOUTH CENTER$12,000
PREPARED TO THRIVE$8,500
A CHILD'S LIGHT$8,500
NORTH STAR OF CHESTER COUNTY$8,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $414k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6% — the area typically sits at 10%. 4% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.4M · 37 repeat orgs$166k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.4M

$166k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%

+151%

Still filing today

92%

55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

LH
LCH HEALTH AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
7× · 2018–2025 · $87k · revenue +76%
AD
ALIANZAS DE PHOENIXVILLE
6× · 2018–2025 · $74k · revenue +11%
TC
THE CLINIC
6× · 2019–2025 · $74k · revenue +59%

Funded once

CW
COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE PROJECT
one grant, 2022 · $15k
BA
BRIDGE ACADEMY AND COMMUNITY CENTERgraduated
one grant, 2024 · $14k · revenue +98%
DV
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER OF CHESCO
one grant, 2022 · $13k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Family Service of Chester County

Provide individual and family support by removing barriers and providing access to resources.

Human Services

Pittsylvania County Community

To increase awareness about poverty and to promote comprehensive approaches to eliminate conditions that cause poverty and improve the quality of life in communities throughout the service area.

—

Child Guidance Resource Centers

To provide high quality, community-based therapeutic, supportive, and preventive heathcare services for children, adolescents and families with mental health, development disability, and residential needs

Health

Chester County Connect Care

Crisis pregnancy counseling

Human Services

Housing Partnership of Chester County Inc

The Housing Partnership of Chester County (HPCC) assists low-to-moderate income individuals and families in the acquisition and retention of long-term attainable housing in Chester County, helping to create and grow safe, stable…

—

Center for Community Action

The center for community action is the designated lead poverty agency for blair, bedford, fulton, and huntingdon counties in central pennsylvania and exists to provide a broad spectrum of services to the low income residents of these…

Housing & Shelter

Ywca Lancaster

The ywca lancaster is a nonprofit organization with a mission to eliminate racism, empower women and promote peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

—

Philadelphia Children's Alliance

Pca promotes healing and justice for sexually abused children in philadelphia. using a multidisciplinary approach, we collaborate with our partners in child protection, law enforcement, and medical and mental health services to provide…

Crime & Legal

Assisting the Community Together

To provide financial and in-kind support to unemployed and underemployed individuals and families in greater west chester who are facing crisis such as eviction, utility shut off, inability to get to their job, put food on the table,…

Human Services

Women's Center and Shelter

Wc&s exists to end domestic violence and create safe spaces for help, healing, and hope.

Human Services

Chamber of Commerce of Greater West Chester Inc

The organization was formed to provide leadership concerning business issues impacting on the local economy and quality of life.

—

Pennsylvania Family Council

Foster social welfare by educating citizens.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maternal and Child Health Consortium of and the most unlike its peers is West Chester Area Senior Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/50

the rest of the field

13%

1,622/12,914

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

46 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

45/46

Grantees still filing

40/46

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$456,350Other$463,550Health$268,630Education$161,285Youth Development$97,000Housing & Shelter$54,000Food & Nutrition$32,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chester County Community FoundationPA64× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chester County Community Foundation · United Way of Chester County Inc · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Connelly Foundation · Justamere Foundation · The Alliance for Health Equity · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Genuardi Family Foundation · The Dansko Foundation Inc · Chester County Bar Foundation · United Way of Southern Chester

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ALIANZAS DE PHOENIXVILLE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~13 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 474293491 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ALIANZAS DE PHOENIXVILLE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 13 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 11% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Fund for Women and Girls?

Find your warmest path to The Fund for Women and Girls through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

46 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Fund for Women and Girls?

More from the funding graph

THE FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

46 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Fund for Women and Girls?

More from the funding graph