How much did THE ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH EQUITY grant in FY2023?

THE ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH EQUITY reported 25 grants totaling $1,216,460 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

Where is THE ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH EQUITY based?

THE ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH EQUITY is based in PA.

THE ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH EQUITY

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

THE ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH EQUITY

To improve the health and well-being of people who live and work in the greater coatesville area by fostering community partnerships, by providing capacity building support and by making grants to promote health equity, healthy youth and a healthy community.

$1.2M

Granted FY2023

Grants

Communities

$710k

Largest

01What you fund

0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.

Health$2.2MHuman Services$494kYouth Development$448kEducation$416kFood & Nutrition$263kHousing & Shelter$132kArts & Culture$103kCommunity Improvement$103kPublic Safety & Disaster$80kOther$650k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

firesafetycrimeproblemssexualsurroundingprevention

2020

reproductivesexualmunopcotheatrespaceeliminationinclusive

2021

equipacademicspiritualeliminationpovertyaddresspositive

2022

fieldscorporationacademiceliminationpovertyaffordablepositive

2023

addictionbringcarelibrarymentoringcreatecultural

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k2 grants · $15k
$10k–50k21 grants · $378k
$50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$250k+1 grant · $710k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$29M

Total assets

Largest grants

CHES PENN HEALTH SERVICES$710,000
TWO FISH AND FIVE LOAVES COMMUNITY CAFE$52,500
CITY OF COATESVILLE$30,000
BRANDYWINE VALLEY ACTIVE AGING$25,000
THE CREATIVE CLUB INC$22,500
CHESTER COUNTY OIC$20,900
CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK$20,000
HOME OF THE SPARROW$20,000
COATESVILLE 2ND CENTURY ALLIANCE$20,000
YOUTH MENTORING PARTNERSHIP$20,000
MINORITY NURSE EDUCATORS OF CHESTER COUNTY$20,000
AIDAN'S HEART FOUNDATION$20,000
COATESVILLE AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY$20,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER CHESTER COUNTY$20,000
VOLUNTEER ENGLISH PROGRAM$20,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $432k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 11%. 2% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.4M · 38 repeat orgs$452k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

38 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2023, 22 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$4.4M

$325k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%

+34%

Still filing today

92%

93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $127k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CH
CHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES
5× · 2018–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +17%
CY
COATESVILLE YOUTH INITIATIVE
4× · 2018–2021 · $285k · revenue +16%
CC
CHESTER COUNTY OIC
4× · 2019–2023 · $266k · revenue +85%

Funded once

MC
MICHAELS COMMUNITY SERVICES CORPORATIONgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $103k · revenue +34%
CA
CHARLES A MELTON ARTS & ED CENTER
one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -23%
YF
YMIC FOUNDATION INCgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue +105%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Child Development and Family Council of

Assist qualifying families in obtaining quality child care in the centre county, pa area.

Human Services

Community Action Commission

Community action commission's mission is to build on the strengths and resources available, provide solutions for complex issues, and empower individuals, families, and communities to move out of poverty.

Human Services

Pennsylvania Family Council

Foster social welfare by educating citizens.

—

Central Pennsylvania Community

Perpetual community fund to aid civic & charitable projects

Philanthropy

Children's Aid Society of Mercer County

Identify and provide services to improve the quality of life for children and families; providing adoption, daycare, and in-home family based mental health services. children's aid society is dedicated to support and strengthen children,…

—

Community Dispute Settlement

The organization provides alternative dispute resolution services through delaware and chester counties. the mission is to empower youth, adults, families, businesses, and communities in discovering their own potential to generate…

—

Center for Community Action

The center for community action is the designated lead poverty agency for blair, bedford, fulton, and huntingdon counties in central pennsylvania and exists to provide a broad spectrum of services to the low income residents of these…

Housing & Shelter

Pittsylvania County Community

To increase awareness about poverty and to promote comprehensive approaches to eliminate conditions that cause poverty and improve the quality of life in communities throughout the service area.

—

Central Pennsylvania Clinic- a Medical

Diagnosis and treatment of, and providing primary and subspecialty care for special children and adults with genetic diseases.

Health

Coshocton County Head Start Inc

Cchs is a comprehensive family and child development program committed to providing quality services that support and nurture the families we serve. our work connects through our community as we prepare our families and children for a…

—

Community Resources of Fayette

To prevent victimization, advocate for, and lessen suffering of victims of crime by providing services in a supportive, inclusive, and safe environment in fayette county.

Health

Making a Change Group

The making a change group is dedicated to empowering youth, strengthening families, and serving as a community connector in chester, pa and its surrounding townships.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maternal and Child Health Consortium of and the most unlike its peers is Immaculata University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/60

the rest of the field

13%

1,622/12,904

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

56 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

56/56

Grantees still filing

41/56

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$2,182,868Other$936,062Human Services$493,600Youth Development$447,825Education$416,200Food & Nutrition$262,871Housing & Shelter$131,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chester County Community FoundationPA61.4× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chester County Community Foundation · United Way of Chester County Inc · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Fund for Women and Girls · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Justamere Foundation · Connelly Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Chester County Food Bank · The Cleveland-Cliffs Foundation · Genuardi Family Foundation · Independence Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH EQUITY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE CREATIVE CLUB INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 874109165 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE CREATIVE CLUB INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 60% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Alliance for Health Equity?

Find your warmest path to The Alliance for Health Equity through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH EQUITY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

56 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Alliance for Health Equity?

More from the funding graph

THE ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH EQUITY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

56 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Alliance for Health Equity?

More from the funding graph