Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Alliance for Health Equity

The primary mission is to improve the health and well-being of people who live and work in the greater coatesville area by fostering community partnerships, by providing capacity building support and by making grants to promote health equity, healthy youth and community.

$879k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$3.9MEducation$757kYouth Development$750kHuman Services$737kHousing & Shelter$331kFood & Nutrition$306kCommunity Improvement$203kArts & Culture$203kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 21 grants below total $823,867 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $878,750 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $54,883 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $281k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $180k
  • $250k+1 grant · $350k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES$350,000
COATESVILLE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH$71,039
COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE$54,941
COATSVILLE HEALTH DEVELOPMENT CORP$54,000
COATESVILLE YOUTH INITIATIVE$32,615
MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CONSORTIUM$27,500
CHESTER COUNTY OIC$25,000
COATESVILLE AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY$25,000
THE CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL$24,838
EDUCATIONAL EQUITY ALLIANCE$20,000
MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION$20,000
BRANDYWINE VALLEY ACTIVE AGING$20,000
OPEN HEARTH INC$15,000
FRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR CARE & PROTECTION$15,000
HOME OF THE SPARROW$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $680k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $20k → 7%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE: $25k → 11%YMIC FOUNDATION INC: $40k → 6%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $20k → 7%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE: $10k → 11%PUBLIC CITIZENS FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH: $5k → 22%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $15k → 7%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE: $8k → 11%THE LINCOLN CENTER FOR FAMILY AND YOUTH: $10k → 7%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE: $5k → 11%PUBLIC CITIZENS FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH: $5k → 22%FRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR CARE & PROTECTION: $20k → 6%FAMILY SERVICE OF CHESTER COUNTY: $19k → 6%FRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR CARE & PROTECTION: $15k → 6%FRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR CARE & PROTECTION: $15k → 6%FAMILY SERVICE OF CHESTER COUNTY: $15k → 6%FAMILY SERVICE OF CHESTER COUNTY: $15k → 6%YMCA OF GREATER BRANDYWINE: $10k → 6%FAMILY SERVICE OF CHESTER COUNTY: $6k → 6%BELIEVE & ACHIEVE FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%BELIEVE AND ACHIEVE FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%BRIAN'S HOUSE: $8k → 6%HUMAN SERVICES INC: $40k → 6%HUMAN SERVICES INC: $25k → 6%HUMAN SERVICES INC: $20k → 6%HUMAN SERVICES INC: $14k → 6%MAX'S KICK FOR KIDS: $10k → 6%BRIDGE ACADEMY AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 6%MAX'S KICKS FOR KIDS: $7k → 6%CHARLES A MELTON ARTS & ED CENTER: $50k → 6%FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHERN CHESTER COUNTY: $8k → 6%OPEN HEARTH INC: $15k → 6%OPEN HEARTH INC: $15k → 6%COMMUNITY YOUTH AND WOMEN'S ALLIANCE: $53k → 6%COMMUNITY YOUTH AND WOMEN'S ALLIANCE: $30k → 6%BRANDYWINE YMCA: $15k → 6%CYWA: $15k → 6%BRANDYWINE YMCA: $10k → 6%THISTLE HILLS INC: $10k → 6%THE BRIDGE ACADEMY AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 6%COMMUNITY YOUTH AND WOMEN'S ALLIANCE: $10k → 6%THE BRIDGE ACADEMY AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.1M · 48 repeat orgs$439k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

48 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
16

Total granted

$7.1M
$360k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+6%

Still filing today

92%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +27%
  • CY
    COATESVILLE YOUTH INITIATIVE
    7× · 2017–2025 · $484k · revenue +16%
  • CC
    CHESTER COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTERS INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $366k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • MC
    MICHAELS COMMUNITY SERVICES CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $103k · revenue -7%
  • CA
    CHARLES A MELTON ARTS & EDUCATION CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +102%
  • PN
    PHILANTHROPY NETWORK GREATER PHILADELPHIA
    one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue -81%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Community Resources Inc

To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…

Health
2
Community Action Commission

Commmunity action commission's mission is to build on the strengths and resources available, provide solutions, for complex issues, and empower individuals, families, and communities to move out of poverty.

Human Services
3
Chartiers Center

Chartiers believes each individual, regardless of economic status, has a right to achieve his/her highest potential and become a self-sufficient and full participating member of the community.

Human Services
4
Berks Counseling Center Inc

Berks counseling center (bcc) is a recovery oriented certified community behavioral health center (ccbhc) with an integrated behavioral and physical health model of service delivery. the center provides a holistic approach to a culturally…

Health
5
Coshocton County Head Start Inc

Cchs is a comprehensive family and child development program committed to providing quality services that support and nurture the families we serve. our work connects through our community as we prepare our families and children for a…

6
Community Human Services Corporation

Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.

Human Services
7
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
8
Center for Community Action

The center for community action is the designated lead poverty agency for blair, bedford, fulton, and huntingdon counties in central pennsylvania and exists to provide a broad spectrum of services to the low income residents of the…

Housing & Shelter
9
Children's Aid Society of Mercer County

To provide information, counseling, and such services as may be appropriate to families or others in raising and nuturing children.

10
Public Health Management Corporation

Public health management corporation (phmc) is a nonprofit public health institute that creates and sustains healthier communities. phmc uses best practices to improve community health through direct service, partnership, innovation,…

Health
11
Children's Advocacy Centers of Pennsylvania

To promote and support the development, growth and continuation of the multidisciplinary approach and children's advocacy centers for the protection of pennsylvania's children.

Youth Development
12
Pittsylvania County Community Action Inc

To increase awareness about poverty and to promote comprehensive approaches to eliminate conditions that cause poverty and improve the quality of life in communities throughout the service area.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maternal and Child Health Consortium of Chester County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Scott Field Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and WelfareCommunity Mental Health Ser…Democracy & Social Justice …Crisis Support & Victim Ser…Neighborhood Economic Devel…Chester County Community Or…Charter SchoolsAcademic Medical Center Ser…Cancer Research and Treatme…Trade Union Benefit FundsAffordable Housing for Vuln…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr15%14%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr18%20%20–35yr11%25%35–55yr15%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr15%5%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr18%14%20–35yr11%52%35–55yr15%15%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/66
the rest of the field
15%
1,873/12,898

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/62
Grantees still filing
39/62
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES INC — $2,765,000 · HealthCHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES INCMATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CONSORTIUM OF CHESTER COUNTY INC — $327,678 · HealthMATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CONSORTIUM OF CHESTER COUNTY IN…CHILD GUIDANCE RESOURCE CENTERS — $238,213 · HealthCHILD GUIDANCE RESOURCE CENTERSPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA — $162,600 · HealthCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE — $133,791 · Health+5 more — $224,282 · Health+5 moreCOMMUNITY YOUTH & WOMEN'S ALLIANCE — $107,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY Y…Domestic Violence Center of Chester County — $102,100 · Human ServicesDomestic Vi…Human Services Inc — $99,200 · Human ServicesHuman Servi…FAMILY SERVICE OF CHESTER COUNTY — $55,400 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERV…MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION — $55,000 · Human ServicesMITZVAH CIR…FRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR THE CARE AND PRO — $50,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS ASS…CHARLES A MELTON ARTS & EDUCATION CENTER — $50,000 · Human ServicesCHARLES A M…VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC — $47,700 · Human ServicesVALLEY YOUT…YMIC FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF GREATER BRANDYWINE — $35,260 · Human ServicesOPEN HEARTH INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGE ACADEMY AND COMMUNITY CENTER — $27,500 · Human Services+7 more — $82,359 · Human Services+7 moreBRANDYWINE VALLEY ACTIVE AGING — $193,400 · OtherBRANDYWINE VALLEY …COATESVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION — $129,450 · OtherCOATESVILLE PUBLIC…Individual grant recipient — $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…CITY OF COATESVILLE — $67,675 · OtherCITY OF COATESVILL…VOLUNTEER ENGLISH PROGRAM IN CHESTER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA — $51,000 · OtherW C Atkinson Memorial Community Service Center — $43,087 · OtherMICHAELS COMMUNITY SERVICES CORPORATION — $102,500 · OtherMICHAELS COMMUNITY…MUNICIPAL OPERA COMPANY OF ALLENTOWN INC — $130,300 · OtherMUNICIPAL OPERA CO…THORNDALE VOLUNTEER FIRE CO INC — $100,300 · OtherTHORNDALE VOLUNTEE…EDUCATIONAL EQUITY ALLIANCE — $53,575 · Other+14 more — $290,000 · Other+14 moreCOATESVILLE YOUTH INITIATIVE — $483,740 · Youth DevelopmentCOATESVIL…THE PARKESBURG POINT — $140,200 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PARKE…YOUTH MENTORING PARTNERSHIP — $25,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentCHESTER COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTERS INC — $365,500 · EducationCHESTER COUNTY FUTURES INC — $72,500 · EducationBRIDGES ACADEMY INC — $70,500 · Education+1 more — $14,350 · EducationTWO FISH AND FIVE LOAVES COMMUNITY CAFE INC — $173,771 · Food & NutritionCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK — $132,100 · Food & NutritionPENNSYLVANIA HOME OF THE SPARROW — $68,000 · Food & NutritionCOATESVILLE 2ND CENTURY ALLIANCE — $95,000 · Community ImprovementCHESTER COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC — $32,150 · Community ImprovementMOVEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $26,000 · Community Improvement
Health$3,851,564Human Services$782,019Other$1,251,287Youth Development$656,440Education$522,850Food & Nutrition$373,871Community Improvement$153,150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES INC — $2,765,000 over 7y, 7.8% of budgetCOATESVILLE YOUTH INITIATIVE — $483,740 over 7y, 21% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTERS INC — $365,500 over 6y, 13% of budgetMATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CONSORTIUM OF CHESTER COUNTY INC — $327,678 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetCHILD GUIDANCE RESOURCE CENTERS — $238,213 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBRANDYWINE VALLEY ACTIVE AGING — $193,400 over 6y, 11% of budgetTWO FISH AND FIVE LOAVES COMMUNITY CAFE INC — $173,771 over 2y, 57% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA — $162,600 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PARKESBURG POINT — $140,200 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE — $133,791 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK — $132,100 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCOATESVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION — $129,450 over 6y, 11% of budgetCOMMUNITY YOUTH & WOMEN'S ALLIANCE — $107,500 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetCOATESVILLE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH — $102,944 over 3y, 12% of budgetMICHAELS COMMUNITY SERVICES CORPORATION — $102,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetDomestic Violence Center of Chester County — $102,100 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetTHORNDALE VOLUNTEER FIRE CO INC — $100,300 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetHuman Services Inc — $99,200 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCOATESVILLE 2ND CENTURY ALLIANCE — $95,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY FUTURES INC — $72,500 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetBRIDGES ACADEMY INC — $70,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA HOME OF THE SPARROW — $68,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF CHESTER COUNTY — $55,400 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetMITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION — $55,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEDUCATIONAL EQUITY ALLIANCE — $53,575 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetVOLUNTEER ENGLISH PROGRAM IN CHESTER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA — $51,000 over 5y, 9.1% of budgetFRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR THE CARE AND PRO — $50,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCHARLES A MELTON ARTS & EDUCATION CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC — $47,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetW C Atkinson Memorial Community Service Center — $43,087 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetPHILANTHROPY NETWORK GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $40,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetYMIC FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetYMCA OF GREATER BRANDYWINE — $35,260 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC — $32,150 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetOPEN HEARTH INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOATESVILLE AREA PARTNERS FOR PROGRESS — $30,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetGOOD WORKS INC — $29,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBRIDGE ACADEMY AND COMMUNITY CENTER — $27,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCRIME VICTIMS' CENTER OF CHESTER COUNTY — $27,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetChester County Community Foundation — $26,772 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOVEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $26,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetYOUTH MENTORING PARTNERSHIP — $25,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL — $24,838 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CREATIVE CLUB INC — $22,500 over 1y, 60% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA HEALTH ACCESS NETWORK — $22,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAidans Heart Foundation — $20,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetBELIEVE & ACHIEVE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetNORTH STAR OF CHESTER COUNTY — $20,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chester County Community FoundationPA65.9× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chester County Community Foundation · United Way of Chester County Inc · The Philadelphia Foundation · Stewart Huston Charitable Trust · Justamere Foundation · The Gordon Charter Foundation · The Fund for Women and Girls · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Chester County Food Bank · Genuardi Family Foundation · Connelly Foundation · The Cleveland-Cliffs Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Alliance for Health Equity funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph