Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Fritz and Mary Lee Duda Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$477k
Granted FY2024still arriving
62
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$16MEducation$4.5MHealth$882kReligion$323kHuman Services$209kPhilanthropy$205kInternational$177kArts & Culture$144kOther$0
02FY2024 · 62 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k43 grants · $93k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $224k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $160k
$3,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC$60,000
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$50,000
URSULINE ACADEMY OF DALLAS$50,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS$40,000
ORANGE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION$23,156
HAWAII CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION$16,000
CHICAGO YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$10,000
SCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN$10,000
OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP CATHOLIC SCHOOL$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC$10,000
TAHOE FUND$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC$10,000
CRISTO REY DALLAS HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $185k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $1k → 5%THE FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC: $25k → 14%CRISIS CENTER INC: $1k → 15%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $1k → 10%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $1k → 5%THE FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC: $10k → 14%CRISIS CENTER INC: $1k → 15%THE FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC: $10k → 14%CRISIS CENTER INC: $1k → 15%ADAPTIVE TRAINING FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%THE FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC: $10k → 14%CRISIS CENTER INC: $1k → 15%ADAPTIVE TRAINING FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC: $10k → 14%CRISIS CENTER INC: $1k → 15%SHARE OUR SELVES: $1k → 10%CRISIS CENTER INC: $1k → 15%SHARE OUR SELVES: $500 → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC: $10k → 14%LAURA'S HOUSE: $3k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $2k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $2k → 10%CASA DE VIDA: $26k → 10%CASA DE VIDA: $10k → 10%CASA DE VIDA: $6k → 10%CASA DE VIDA: $5k → 10%FORGOTTEN CHILDREN'S FUND: $2k → 9%EDDY HOUSE: $5k → 10%EDDY HOUSE: $4k → 10%EDDY HOUSE: $4k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S CABINET: $3k → 10%EDDY HOUSE: $3k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC: $3k → 10%CASA DE VIDA: $2k → 10%HOUSING FORWARD: $2k → 14%CASA DE VIDA: $2k → 10%METRO DALLAS HOMELESS ALLIANCE: $2k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S CABINET: $2k → 10%EDDY HOUSE: $500 → 10%SOUPMOBILE INC: $1k → 14%GIVINGMAS INC: $2k → 14%GIVINGMAS INC: $2k → 14%GIVINGMAS: $1k → 14%GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
KY
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.8M · 135 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

135 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2024, 96 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

135
121

Total granted

$5.8M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+21%

Still filing today

51%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Southern Methodist University
    2× · 2020–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +26%
  • NT
    NORTHERN TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2023 · $245k · revenue +18%
  • Northwestern University
    6× · 2019–2024 · $124k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • SU
    STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $250k · revenue +21%
  • DO
    DEPT OF CATHOLIC SCHOOLS RCBO
    one grant, 2019 · $180k
  • HI
    HALO INITIATIVE FOR CATHOLIC EDUCATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
4
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
5
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
6
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
7
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
8
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
9
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
10
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
11
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
12
The Association of Former Students of Texas a&M University

To strengthen the association of former students, promote the interests and welfare of texas a&m university, perpetuate ties of affection and esteem formed in university or college days, and serve the student body.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Wooden Floor for Youth Movement; the most unlike its peers is Helping Hands 4 Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

155 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 155 of the 284 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
151/155
Grantees still filing
109/155
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Notre Dame du Lac: $15,170,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacSouthern Methodist University: $1,010,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist University+20 more: $598,250 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $1,100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUN…BISHOP DUNNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL INC: $221,317 · OtherDEPT OF CATHOLIC SCHOOLS RCBO: $180,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $175,000 · OtherST MARY OF CARMEL SCHOOL INC: $158,000 · Other+131 more: $2,831,415 · Other+131 moreNORTHERN TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION: $245,000 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern University: $124,000 · Recreation & SportsCHICAGO YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION: $49,500 · Recreation & SportsCOLUMBIA SAILING SCHOOL: $20,000 · Recreation & Sports+3 more: $17,500 · Recreation & SportsMAYO CLINIC: $220,000 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $110,000 · HealthBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $80,000 · Health+7 more: $39,100 · HealthTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $75,000 · PhilanthropySPJST Foundation INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $44,500 · PhilanthropyHAWAII CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE COUNTY: $11,600 · PhilanthropySAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $5,500 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC: $75,000 · Human ServicesCASA DE VIDA: $50,000 · Human ServicesEDDY HOUSE: $16,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesCRISIS CENTER INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesLAURA'S HOUSE: $6,000 · Human Services+7 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesREADERS 2 LEADERS: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INC: $3,500 · Youth Development+1 more: $2,000 · Youth Development
Education$16,778,250Other$4,665,732Recreation & Sports$456,000Health$449,100Philanthropy$216,600Human Services$180,000Youth Development$65,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $15,170,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $1,010,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHERN TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION: $245,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $220,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $124,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $110,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC: $91,350 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC: $75,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST TRANSPLANT ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetCASA DE VIDA: $50,000 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetCHICAGO YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION: $49,500 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $44,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetREADERS 2 LEADERS: $35,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetTEXAS HISTORICAL FOUNDATION: $33,200 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTAHOE FUND: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $26,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOUT TEACH: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $23,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNOTRE DAME OF DALLAS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 over 2y, 59% of budgetINLAND LAKE YACHTING ASSOCIATIONIN: $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF RENO INC: $20,000 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetCRISTO REY DALLAS HIGH SCHOOL INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOLUMBIA SAILING SCHOOL: $20,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC: $18,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRenown Health Foundation: $17,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLUMIN EDUCATION: $16,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEDDY HOUSE: $16,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $16,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INC: $15,200 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUPLIFT EDUCATION: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA of Texas: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE COUNTY: $11,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetI C A R E Dog Rescue: $11,500 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreat Lakes Center for the Arts: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAPPY MOFFIT FIELD FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetSAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRAVEONES FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetTHE GREATER RENO COMMUNITY ICE SKATING ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds HALO INITIATIVE FOR CATHOLIC EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MORNINGSIDE HIGH MONARCHS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Baylor Health Care System Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC ↗
  • Who funds THE DALLAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST TRANSPLANT ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CASA DE VIDA ↗
  • Who funds SPJST Foundation INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX40.1× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Aileen and Jack Pratt Foundation · Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw · The Mike and Mary Terry Family Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Texas Women's Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Fritz and Mary Lee Duda Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fritz and Mary Lee Duda Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
32report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 284 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fritz and Mary Lee Duda Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph