How much did THE FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURAL INTEGRIT grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of THE FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURAL INTEGRIT’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

carbon

2019

milkchurchtowncarbon

2020

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$200,000

Median grant

States reached

$58M

Total assets

Largest grants

THE HUDSON CARBON RESEARCH FOUNDATION$200,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 14%. 1% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.9M · 7 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +259% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.9M

$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+259%

Still filing today

57%

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MB
MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY
3× · 2017–2019 · $929k · revenue +22%
FO
FRIENDS OF HUDSON YOUTH
2× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +687%
KN
KITE'S NEST
3× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +259%

Funded once

WH
WOODS HOLE
one grant, 2020 · $47k
TL
THE LUNAR STRATEGEM
one grant, 2019 · $46k
RM
RAW MILK INSTITUTE
one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Hudson Lyric Opera

The Hudson Lyric Opera is an organization dedicated to providing culturalopportunities for talented singers and musicians in the Hudson Valleyregion that have been classically or formally trained who, otherwise, wouldnot be able to devote…

Arts & Culture

Hudson Opera House Inc

Located in a landmark building that houses new york state's oldest surviving theater, hudson hall at the historic hudson opera house is driven by a civic and social purpose founded in the belief that culture is central to our shared…

Arts & Culture

Hudson Riverfront

The mission of the hudson riverfront performing arts center, inc. (hrpac) is to expand the performing arts in hudson county, new jersey. the organization endeavors to serve residents of hudson county, as well as those of the surrounding…

Arts & Culture

On Site Opera Inc

On Site Operas mission is to:produce site-specific productions in venues throughout New York Cityenrich the cultural life of New York by bringing opera to new audiences who otherwise may not have the opportunity to experience this type of…

—

Friends of Hudson River Park Inc

Friends of Hudson River Park is a non-profit organization dedicated to the completion, care and enhancement of Hudson River Park. Hudson River Park spans four miles along Manhattan's west side waterfront from 59th Street south to Chambers…

Recreation & Sports

Historic Hudson Valley

Hhv celebrates the history and culture of the hudson valley.

Arts & Culture

Opera Company of Middlebury

The mission of the Opera Company of Middlebury (OCM) is to bring professional-level, quality live opera productions and experiences to our region. We also maintain a robust educational program for emerging professionals and teen singers…

Arts & Culture

The Scenic Hudson Land Trust Inc

See Schedule O for The Scenic Hudson Land Trust's mission statement.

Environment

The Hudson Review Inc

Publication of quarterly literary magazine

Arts & Culture

Hudson River Rowing Association

Provide education and training to individuals in the art of rowing without preference to race, creed, age, religion, color or disability. to provide the equitable means for both competitive and recreational rowing.

Recreation & Sports

New York Academy of Sciences

To advance scientific knowledge and to increase the number of scientifically informed individuals.

—

Jeunes Virtuoses De New York Inc

Jeunes Virtuoses de New York" (JVNY) is an ensemble of exceptionally accomplished young musicians who perform on both sides of the Atlantic both as a string camerata, and in various chamber music configurations. Our mission is to transform…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kite's Nest Inc and the most unlike its peers is Raw Milk Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

12/13

Grantees still filing

6/13

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,446,294Science & Tech$928,824Environment$600,729Arts & Culture$9,100Food & Nutrition$8,250Youth Development$2,560Community Improvement$2,546Employment$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hrbt FoundationNY20.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hrbt Foundation · Bank of Greene County · Flood-Gamble Foundation Inc · The Alexander and Marjorie · Eutopia Foundation · Eugene M Lang Foundation · Berkshire Taconic Community · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURAL INTEGRIT funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE HUDSON CARBON RESEARCH FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~0 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 3 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 854324015 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE HUDSON CARBON RESEARCH FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 31% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit?

Find your warmest path to The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURAL INTEGRIT

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit?

More from the funding graph

THE FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURAL INTEGRIT

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit?

More from the funding graph