Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$200k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2024
1
Organizations funded FY2023
100%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$200,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$200,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 10
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$58M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 100% of the organizations The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $399k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving1$200k0%
FY20231$399k100%
FY20226$9k50%
FY202110$391k50%
FY20209$997k78%
FY201910$373k90%
FY20181$577k0%
FY20171$51kn/a
85% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$936kEnvironment$608kArts & Culture$55kFood & Nutrition$17kYouth Development$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kReligion$2kEducation$750Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 14 grantees
All grantees of The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Marine Biological Laboratory$928,82431%
The Hudson Carbon Research Foundation In$599,229231%
Raw Milk Institute$15,500210%
Beautiful Racket Inc$3,6001n/a
Friends of Hudson Youth Inc$2,56021%
Upstage Productions Inc$2,5001n/a
Crescendo Inc$2,50011%
Kite's Nest Inc$2,29630%
Columbia Land Conservancy Inc$1,50010%
National Young Farmers Coalition Inc$51910%
Hudson Festival Orchestra$50011%
Triform Enterprises Ltd$25010%
The Olana Partnership$25010%
The Weston a Price Foundation$25010%

Plus 12 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.4M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 12 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarine Biological Laboratory: $928,824 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetThe Hudson Carbon Research Foundation In: $599,229 over 2y, 31% of budgetRaw Milk Institute: $15,500 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetFriends of Hudson Youth Inc: $2,560 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCrescendo Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetKite's Nest Inc: $2,296 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetColumbia Land Conservancy Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Young Farmers Coalition Inc: $519 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHudson Festival Orchestra: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTriform Enterprises Ltd: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Olana Partnership: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Weston a Price Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hrbt FoundationNY17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hrbt Foundation · Flood-Gamble Foundation Inc · The Alexander and Marjorie Hover Foundation · Eutopia Foundation · Bank of Greene County Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit?

Find your warmest path to The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit

How much does The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit give?
The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit reported 1 grants totaling $200,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 10 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Science & Tech (31%), Environment (20%), Arts & Culture (2%).
Who are The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Marine Biological Laboratory ($929k), The Hudson Carbon Research Foundation In ($599k), Raw Milk Institute ($16k).
Does The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Hrbt Foundation, Flood-Gamble Foundation Inc, The Alexander and Marjorie Hover Foundation.
Where is The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit based?
The Foundation for Agricultural Integrit is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Foundation for Agricultural Integrit’s filings →

More from the funding graph