Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Eutopia Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.5M
Granted FY2023
52
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.

Human Services$2.8MEducation$1.9MEnvironment$1.4MCivil Rights$1.1MPublic Benefit$1.1MHealth$940kYouth Development$783kPhilanthropy$666kOther$0
02FY2023 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k19 grants · $66k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $279k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.8M
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.4M
$24,550
Median grant
6
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER HUDSON PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD INC$1,072,050
KITES NEST INC$364,925
U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION$200,000
ALKEBULAN FISCAL SPONSORS$200,000
WE DEFEND TRUTH$175,000
CITY OF HUDSON$120,030
CLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND$114,117
SHED NYC INC$100,000
FRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC SQUARE HUDSON INC$100,000
FIGHT FOR THE FUTURE EDUCATION FUND$100,000
COLUMBIA GREENE COMMUNITY COLLEGE ASSOCIATION INC$81,610
UNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLE$75,000
GREENE COUNTY COUNCIL ON THE ARTS$70,100
HUMANITY FORWARD FOUNDATION$70,000
HUDSON SLOOP CLUB INC$68,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HELLO NEIGHBOR: $1k → 11%COLUMBIA COUNTY RECOVERY KITCHEN: $15k → 9%COLUMBIA COUNTY RECOVERY KITCHEN: $5k → 11%GREATER HUDSON PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD INC: $1.1M → 11%GREATER HUDSON PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD INC: $981k → 11%COLUMBIA COUNTY SANCTUARY MOVEMENT: $320k → 11%GREATER HUDSON PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD INC: $234k → 11%COLUMBIA COUNTY SANCTUARY MOVEMENT: $50k → 11%GREATER HUDSON PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD INC: $36k → 11%COLUMBIA COUNTY SANCTUARY MOVEMENT: $26k → 11%GREATER HUDSON PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD INC: $20k → 11%GREATER HUDSON PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD INC: $15k → 11%COLUMBIA CHILDRENS CENTER: $15k → 11%COLUMBIA COUNTY SANCTUARY MOVEMENT: $4k → 11%COLUMBIA COUNTY RECOVERY KITCHEN INC: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
MA
OR
NV
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DC
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Eutopia Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Eutopia Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.0% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.0M · 34 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2023, 13 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
50

Total granted

$9.0M
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+30%

Still filing today

82%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesHealthPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GREATER HUDSON PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $2.4M · revenue ×17 · 63% of their budget
  • CE
    CLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND
    3× · 2021–2023 · $714k · revenue +145%
  • KN
    KITE'S NEST INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $692k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • WF
    WESPAC FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $550k · revenue +272% · 51% of their budget
  • TC
    The Columbia Memorial Hospital
    one grant, 2022 · $450k
  • TS
    THE SPARK OF HUDSON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue -76% · 88% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coalition for Green Capital D/B/a American Green Bank Consortium

Cgc operates as a nonprofit financial institution that invests directly and through partners to transform financial markets by using public and private investing to accelerate the deployment of projects that strengthen the grid, reduce…

Environment
2
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Open New York Education Inc

Open new york education, inc. supports public education, awareness, and engagement around housing issues to help build a movement for a more abundant and inclusive new york.

Housing & Shelter
5
The American Assembly

A national non partisan public policy forum to illuminate issues of public policy.

—
6
Hudson River Foundation for Science and Environmental Research Inc

The mission of the hudson river foundation is to inspire and inform action through science and engaging people to enhance the hudson river, estuary, and watershed (see schedule o).

Environment
7
New York Restoration Project

New york restoration project ("nyrp") believes that nature is a fundamental right of every new yorker. nyrp works collaboratively with residents in communities across the five boroughs to renovate gardens, restore parks, plant trees,…

Environment
8
Planet Reimagined Inc

Planet reimagined is on a mission to deliver fair solutions for people and the planet.the organization is a creative climate incubator using an innovative action research method to test, refine, and scale solutions. we bring together…

Environment
9
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
10
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
11
Hudson Yards Development Corporation

See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…

Community Improvement
12
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Alkebulan Fiscal Sponsors. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Community FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsLocal Food System Organizat…Food Banks and PantriesCommunity College Foundatio…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Jewish Community Organizati…Elementary Literacy TutoringDevelopmental Disabilities …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Arts CentersLocal History MuseumsPublic Library OperationsPolicy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%6%<5yr14%24%5–10yr20%28%10–20yr19%18%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%6%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%4%<5yr14%44%5–10yr20%28%10–20yr19%6%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/106
the rest of the field
10%
11,857/120,654

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

101 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 101 of the 121 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
26
Early backer (in before they grew)
98/101
Grantees still filing
63/101
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $805,356 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWESPAC FOUNDATION INC — $550,000 · OtherWESPAC FOUNDATION INCWE DEFEND TRUTH — $515,000 · OtherWE DEFEND TRUTHIndividual grant recipient — $175,000 · OtherFIGHT FOR THE FUTURE EDUCATION FUND — $280,000 · OtherFIGHT FOR THE FUTURE EDUCATION FUNDRepresentUs Education Fund — $275,000 · OtherRepresentUs Education FundHUMANITY FORWARD FOUNDATION — $201,853 · Other+65 more — $2,302,665 · Other+65 moreGREATER HUDSON PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD INC — $2,359,070 · Human ServicesGREATER HUDSON PROMISE N…COLUMBIA COUNTY SANCTUARY MOVEMENT INC — $400,000 · Human ServicesCOLUMBIA COUNTY SANCTUAR…TIDES CENTER — $100,000 · Human Services+4 more — $62,000 · Human ServicesAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC — $388,115 · EducationAMERICANS FOR …UNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLE — $250,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $220,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVE…UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $200,000 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO F…THE SPARK OF HUDSON FOUNDATION — $150,000 · EducationTHE SPARK OF H…HUDSON AREA ASSOCIATION LIBRARY — $140,658 · EducationHUDSON AREA AS…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $106,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES O…COLUMBIA-GREENE COMMUNITY COLLEGE ASSOCIATION INC — $91,610 · EducationCOLUMBIA-GREEN…+6 more — $129,400 · Education+6 moreCLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND — $714,117 · EnvironmentCLIMATE EME…HUDSON SLOOP CLUB INC — $135,500 · EnvironmentHUDSON SLOO…FRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC SQUARE HUDSON INC — $100,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF …Climate Mobilization Project Inc — $100,000 · EnvironmentClimate Mob…CarbonPlan — $100,000 · EnvironmentCarbonPlanWINDWARD FUND — $50,000 · Environment+8 more — $143,007 · Environment+8 moreThe Columbia Memorial Hospital — $450,000 · HealthKyler Cares Foundation QBO — $243,800 · HealthAlkebulan Fiscal Sponsors — $200,000 · Health+3 more — $22,550 · HealthOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION — $275,000 · PhilanthropyHOPEWELL FUND — $275,000 · PhilanthropyCHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC — $241,245 · Philanthropy+3 more — $67,600 · PhilanthropyKITE'S NEST INC — $692,475 · Community Improvement+1 more — $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$5,104,874Human Services$2,921,070Education$1,675,783Environment$1,342,624Health$916,350Philanthropy$858,845Community Improvement$697,475

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREATER HUDSON PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD INC — $2,359,070 over 4y, 63% of budgetCLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND — $714,117 over 3y, 9.1% of budgetKITE'S NEST INC — $692,475 over 3y, 21% of budgetWESPAC FOUNDATION INC — $550,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetCOLUMBIA COUNTY SANCTUARY MOVEMENT INC — $400,000 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC — $388,115 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetFIGHT FOR THE FUTURE EDUCATION FUND — $280,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION — $275,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetRepresentUs Education Fund — $275,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND — $275,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLE — $250,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetKyler Cares Foundation QBO — $243,800 over 2y, 94% of budgetCHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC — $241,245 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $220,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANITY FORWARD FOUNDATION — $201,853 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SPARK OF HUDSON FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 1y, 88% of budgetHUDSON AREA ASSOCIATION LIBRARY — $140,658 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetHUDSON SLOOP CLUB INC — $135,500 over 2y, 71% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC — $118,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $106,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFREE AND FAIR LITIGATION GROUP INC — $100,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC SQUARE HUDSON INC — $100,000 over 1y, 68% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetClimate Mobilization Project Inc — $100,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetCarbonPlan — $100,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSHED NYC INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOLUMBIA-GREENE COMMUNITY COLLEGE ASSOCIATION INC — $91,610 over 1y, 19% of budgetGREENE COUNTY COUNCIL ON THE ARTS — $70,100 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND (DBA THE IRELAND FUNDS AMERICA/THE IRELAND FUNDS) — $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGLYNWOOD CENTER INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCornell University — $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUDSON OPERA HOUSE INC — $52,650 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetFrom The Heart Productions — $52,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFILM FORUM INC — $52,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWINDWARD FUND — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMBINATORICS CONSORTIUM INC — $50,000 over 1y, 52% of budgetECONOMIC SECURITY PROJECT INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHARACTER LAB INC — $50,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetClimate Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetRHIZOME COMMUNICATIONS INC co NEW MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART — $40,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $35,330 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBASILICA ARTS INC — $34,500 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF HUDSON YOUTH INC — $33,808 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetOPERATION UNITE NEW YORK INC — $32,099 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEW WORLD FOUNDATION — $27,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berkshire Taconic Com…Hrbt FoundationBank of Greene County…The Jm Kaplan Fund IncThe Alexander and Mar…The Ackerman Foundati…Galvan Foundation Cha…The Arthur and Eileen…Novo FoundationCommunity Foundations…Rheinstrom Hill Commu…T Backer Fund Inc
Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation IncMA51.5× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Hrbt Foundation · Bank of Greene County Charitable Foundation · The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc · The Alexander and Marjorie Hover Foundation · The Ackerman Foundation Inc · Galvan Foundation Charitable Trust · The Arthur and Eileen Newman Family Foundation · Novo Foundation · Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · Rheinstrom Hill Community Foundation · T Backer Fund Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Eutopia Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Eutopia Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Eutopia Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 121 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines