· Private foundation
Flood-Gamble Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k43 grants · $81k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $44k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THOMAS COLE HISTORIC SITE | $14,400 |
| HUDSON ATHENS LIGHTHOUSE | $10,000 |
| THE OLANA PARTNERSHIP | $10,000 |
| NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,500 |
| PRESERVATON LEAGUE OF NYS | $5,000 |
| LGBTQ & MUSEUM | $5,000 |
| WELLESLEY COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| WMHT | $5,000 |
| COLUMBIA LAND CONSERVANCY | $5,000 |
| COLUMBIA COUNTY HISTORICAL | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| CNY LYME & TICK BORNE DISEASE | $3,000 |
| WNETTHIRTEEN | $2,500 |
| LAND TRUST ALLIANCE | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
94 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2024, 50 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GWGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC4× · 2017–2020 · $175k · revenue +56%
- TOTHE OLANA PARTNERSHIP8× · 2017–2024 · $81k · revenue +302%
- HAHUDSON ATHENS LIGHTHOUSE PRESERVATION SOCIETY7× · 2017–2024 · $54k · revenue ×31
Funded once
- MTMAC-HAYDN THEATRE INCone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +6%
- TTTHE THURSDAY CLUB SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIAgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +172%
- TITHE INT'L CENTER FOR JOURNALISTS INCone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -86%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…
The municipal art society of new york (mas) lifts up the voices of the people in the debates that shape new york's built environment and leads the way to a more livable city from sidewalk to skyline. mas envisions a future in which all new…
See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…
The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…
The mission of the hudson river foundation is to inspire and inform action through science and engaging people to enhance the hudson river, estuary, and watershed (see schedule o).
The historic house trust of new york city (hht), in partnership with the new york city department of parks & recreation (nyc parks), advocates for, promotes, and provides expertise to preserve 23 publicly owned historic sites in new york…
Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
Enhance Columbia University's education mission by acquiring and publishing outstanding original works by scholars and others that contribute to an understanding of global human concerns. Columbia University Press became part of the…
Situated on the banks of the hudson river in yonkers, new york, the hudson river museum's mission is to engage, inspire, and connect diverse communities through the power of the arts, sciences, and history.
The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Garden Conservancy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Retro Report Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE OLANA PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds HUDSON ATHENS LIGHTHOUSE PRESERVATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Wellesley College ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES ↗
- Who funds PRESERVATION LEAGUE OF NEW YORK STATE ↗
- Who funds KITE'S NEST INC ↗
- Who funds WMHT EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Columbia County Historical Society Inc ↗
- Who funds RETRO REPORT INC ↗
- Who funds WNET ↗
- Who funds MAC-HAYDN THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds LAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds GLYNWOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PREP FOR PREP ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC HUDSON INC ↗
- Who funds ETHIOPIA EDUCATION INITIATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds THE THURSDAY CLUB SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds THE INT'L CENTER FOR JOURNALISTS INC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA-GREENE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA COUNTY RECOVERY KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Lyndhurst Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds JONAH BOKAER ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds New York Historical Society ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hrbt Foundation · Bank of Greene County Charitable Foundation · The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc · T Backer Fund Inc · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Patricia E and Joseph W Phelan Family Foundation Inc · Rheinstrom Hill Community Foundation · The Alexander and Marjorie Hover Foundation · Eugene M Lang Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Galvan Foundation Charitable Trust · Eutopia Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Flood-Gamble Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Hope and Safety Inc — 69% of income from government
- Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.