· Public charity
The Dorsey & Whitney Foundation
Supporting tax exempt charitable and educational organizations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 48 grants below total $725,940 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,005,433 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $279,493 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $127k
- $10k–50k28 grants · $368k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $231k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Greater Twin Cities United Way | $150,000 |
| Fund for the Legal Aid Society | $80,690 |
| Advocates for Human Rights | $30,000 |
| And Justice for All | $25,000 |
| Lawyers Co for Civil Rights Under | $20,000 |
| University of Minnesota Foundation | $20,000 |
| Guthrie Theater | $20,000 |
| Project PAVE | $16,080 |
| Treehouse | $15,390 |
| Intermountain Healthcare Foundation at Primary Children's Hospital | $15,000 |
| Council for Canadian American Relations | $12,500 |
| Children's Museum of Denver | $12,000 |
| Breakthrough T1D | $11,290 |
| Triform Enterprises Limited | $10,840 |
| Genesis Women's Shelter & Support | $10,225 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
82 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2024, 45 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SHSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND6× · 2018–2023 · $1.7M · revenue +102%
- SHSIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC2× · 2022–2023 · $800k · revenue +87%
- GTGUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $660k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- MPMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIAone grant, 2017 · $1.5M · revenue +5%
- SASUMMIT ACADEMY OICone grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +8%
- NANORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONEgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $600k · revenue +88%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To attract, recruit, advance, and retain attorneys of color in the twin cities through education and collaboration with member organizations.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To create an extraordinary downtown minneapolis, applying the core values of leadership, collaboration, advocacy and innovation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Minneapolis Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Utah Voices Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
138 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 138 of the 145 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT ACADEMY OIC ↗
- Who funds SIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds GUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE ↗
- Who funds Children's Theatre Company and School ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR LEGAL AID ↗
- Who funds ST DAVID'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds LUNDSTRUM CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS DBA LUNDSTRUM PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Economic Development Association ↗
- Who funds Minneapolis American Indian Center ↗
- Who funds NORTHSIDE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WAY TO GROW ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF MINNEAPOLIS ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
- Who funds Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law ↗
- Who funds The Advocates For Human Rights ↗
- Who funds AT HOME GROUP ↗
- Who funds KING COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE SAINT PAUL CHAMBER ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds PROJECT PAVE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR FAMILY REPRESENTATION INC ↗
- Who funds AND JUSTICE FOR ALL ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR MODERN COURTS INC ↗
- Who funds TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF DENVER INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY GATEWAY INC ↗
- Who funds LAWYERS ALLIANCE FOR NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds COOKE SCHOOL AND INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds DENVER WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL DBA WORLDDE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Target Foundation · Faegre Drinker Foundation · William Boss Foundation · The Hubbard Broadcasting Foundation · Hardenbergh Foundation · Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Dorsey & Whitney Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Dorsey & Whitney Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Dorsey & Whitney Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.